Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,788 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Communication Complexity of Universal Features

Abstract

Motivated by the notion of features from machine learning, we study the complexity of representing data that allows for evaluation with a given family of functions. Concretely, we consider a deterministic encoder that observes X∼ D and produces a finite encoding before a task f∈ℱ⊆{0,1}𝒳 is specified. For each task, a decoder must predict f(X) with error at most ε under D. We construct an encoder that outputs a representation with O(d*log(1/ε)) bits, where d* is the dual VC dimension of ℱ. Our encoder greedily selects O((d*/ε)log(1/ε)) functions from the class and uses their joint label pattern to produce the encoding. The key idea in our upper bound is a novel potential function argument, where we compare the entropy gained from each greedy selection with the number of patterns allowed by the dual VC dimension. We present lower bounds showing that the representation length achieved by our encoder is worst-case optimal for every d* ≥ 1 and ε < 1/4 up to a universal constant factor, and instance-wise optimal for every family ℱ up to an O(log(1/ε)) factor. We give two ways to learn the representation from unlabeled samples, with different guarantees on the representation size and sample complexity. Experimentally, we verify the greedy construction's accuracy-size tradeoff and explore its connection to neural sparse autoencoders.

Related

  1. A note on the nondeterministic communication complexity of equality
    Mathieu Hoyrup
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsHAL
  2. Recognizable Picture Languages: Separating UREC from coUREC via Communication Complexity
    Antonin Callard, Andrei Romashchenko, Véronique Terrier +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Infinite Communication Complexity and KW Games
    Evan Leach
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textLogic & foundationsarXiv
  4. A Universal Lower Bound for the Complexity of Gaussian-Divisible Spin Glasses
    Pax Kivimae, Benjamin McKenna
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  5. Embedding complexity into the universal Banach space and the strong Novikov conjecture
    Geng Tian, Guoliang Yu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{hu2026communication,
  title = {{Communication Complexity of Universal Features}},
  author = {Lunjia Hu and Anish Jayant and Peter Li and Princewill Okoroafor and Abhishek Shetty},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27402},
  eprint = {2610.27402},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27402},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Communication Complexity of Universal Features
AU  - Lunjia Hu
AU  - Anish Jayant
AU  - Peter Li
AU  - Princewill Okoroafor
AU  - Abhishek Shetty
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27402
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27402
AB  - Motivated by the notion of features from machine learning, we study the complexity of representing data that allows for evaluation with a given family of functions. Concretely, we consider a deterministic encoder that observes X∼ D and produces a finite encoding before a task f∈ℱ⊆{0,1}^𝒳 is specified. For each task, a decoder must predict f(X) with error at most ε under D. We construct an encoder that outputs a representation with O(d^*log(1/ε)) bits, where d^* is the dual VC dimension of ℱ. Our encoder greedily selects O((d^*/ε)log(1/ε)) functions from the class and uses their joint label pattern to produce the encoding. The key idea in our upper bound is a novel potential function argument, where we compare the entropy gained from each greedy selection with the number of patterns allowed by the dual VC dimension. We present lower bounds showing that the representation length achieved by our encoder is worst-case optimal for every d^* ≥ 1 and ε < 1/4 up to a universal constant factor, and instance-wise optimal for every family ℱ up to an O(log(1/ε)) factor. We give two ways to learn the representation from unlabeled samples, with different guarantees on the representation size and sample complexity. Experimentally, we verify the greedy construction's accuracy-size tradeoff and explore its connection to neural sparse autoencoders.
ER  -