Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Global leadership initiative on malnutrition-based nutritional phenotype and factors associated with the outcomes of hospitalized patients managed by a nutrition support team: A retrospective study

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: What are the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria leading to the diagnosis of malnutrition at hospital, specifically in diabetic patients, is not well known. The factors associated with the clinical outcomes of nutritionally at-risk hospitalized patients have been scarcely investigated. AIMS: To characterize the GLIM-based nutritional phenotype of hospitalized patients managed by a Nutrition Support Teams (NST) (primary), and to compare the GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (secondary); to identify the factors associated with hospital readmission one month after discharge and one-month mortality (secondary). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including all the consecutive adult patients managed by the NST of a tertiary university hospital. The exclusion criteria were age under 18 yr and absence of assessment of body composition by bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Malnutrition was diagnosed according to the GLIM criteria: the etiologic criterion was the hospitalization for an acute or chronic disease, and three phenotypic criteria were: low body mass index (BMI), weight loss, and/or low fat-free mass index (FFMI) derived from BIA. Food intake was assessed by the Simple Evaluation of Food Intake® (SEFI®). Handgrip strength was measured using a dynamometer. Hospital readmission and death one month after discharge were collected from the electronic medical records (EMR). Multivariable logistic regression analyses using a stepwise top-down selection identified factors associated with one-month hospital readmission and mortality. RESULTS: 231 patients were included: 43 % of females, age (mean ± SD), 62.2 ± 15.9 yr, BMI, 23.5 ± 6.4, 73.6 % (170/231) were malnourished, of whom 66.5 % (113/170) had severe malnutrition, and 20.3 % (47/231) had diabetes. Malnutrition was diagnosed according to the three phenotypic criteria in 59/170 patients (34.7 %), two in 56/170 patients (33.1 %), and only one in 54/170 patients (31.8 %). The diabetic patients were less likely to have a low FFMI (29.8 % (14/47) vs 60.9 % (109/179), P < 0.001) or be malnourished (61.7 % (29/47) vs 76.6 % (141/184), P = 0.04), but more likely to have a low handgrip strength (64.3 % (27/42) vs 45.6 % (68/149), P = 0.03) than non-diabetic patients. Multivariable analyses showed that cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 2.51 [1.17-5.37], P = 0.02) and SEFI® score (OR = 0.89 [95 % confidence interval, 0.79-0.99], P = 0.04) were associated with higher risk of hospital readmission, whereas weight loss (OR = 3.20 [1.26-8.17], P = 0.01) and diabetes (OR = 2.76 [1.10-6.91], P = 0.03) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: One third of patients were diagnosed malnutrition with one phenotypic criterion, suggesting that all the GLIM phenotypic criteria should be used to ensure the diagnosis of malnutrition. The diabetic patients had higher FFMI and lower handgrip strength than non-diabetic patients. In patients managed by NST, low food intake and cancer are associated with hospital readmission, while diabetes and weight loss with early mortality.

Related

  1. Practical Approaches to Nutritional Interventions for Malnutrition, Sarcopenia, and Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults and Care Home Populations: A Narrative Review
    Haya Khalaf, Camilla Hopwood, Caryn Straker +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  2. Impact of malnutrition and nutritional support on infectious complications in critically ill infants and children
    Jason S. Kerstein, Julia K. Weld, Daniel T. Mulhall +5
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Sarcopenia in Hospitalized Patients: A Critical Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Nutritional Management Approaches
    Gavriela Voulgaridou, Spyridoula Ioanna Mourtziapi, George Panoutsopoulos +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Nutritional Screening in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Comparative Study in Mexico
    Mariana Chávez Tostado, Gabino Cervantes Guevara, Francisco Álvarez López +12
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Body weight–normalized resting metabolic rate and its associations with malnutrition and sarcopenia in hospitalized older adults: a cross-sectional study
    Shan Jiang, Jie Zhao, Peng Chen +7
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{barrallier2026global,
  title = {{Global leadership initiative on malnutrition-based nutritional phenotype and factors associated with the outcomes of hospitalized patients managed by a nutrition support team: A retrospective study}},
  author = {Mathilde Barrallier and Emeric Rageul and Charlotte Nesseler and Quentin Le Cornu and Ronan Thibault},
  journal = {Clinical Nutrition ESPEN},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.102889},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05455702v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Global leadership initiative on malnutrition-based nutritional phenotype and factors associated with the outcomes of hospitalized patients managed by a nutrition support team: A retrospective study
AU  - Mathilde Barrallier
AU  - Emeric Rageul
AU  - Charlotte Nesseler
AU  - Quentin Le Cornu
AU  - Ronan Thibault
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
DO  - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.102889
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05455702v1
AB  - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: What are the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria leading to the diagnosis of malnutrition at hospital, specifically in diabetic patients, is not well known. The factors associated with the clinical outcomes of nutritionally at-risk hospitalized patients have been scarcely investigated. AIMS: To characterize the GLIM-based nutritional phenotype of hospitalized patients managed by a Nutrition Support Teams (NST) (primary), and to compare the GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (secondary); to identify the factors associated with hospital readmission one month after discharge and one-month mortality (secondary). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including all the consecutive adult patients managed by the NST of a tertiary university hospital. The exclusion criteria were age under 18 yr and absence of assessment of body composition by bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Malnutrition was diagnosed according to the GLIM criteria: the etiologic criterion was the hospitalization for an acute or chronic disease, and three phenotypic criteria were: low body mass index (BMI), weight loss, and/or low fat-free mass index (FFMI) derived from BIA. Food intake was assessed by the Simple Evaluation of Food Intake® (SEFI®). Handgrip strength was measured using a dynamometer. Hospital readmission and death one month after discharge were collected from the electronic medical records (EMR). Multivariable logistic regression analyses using a stepwise top-down selection identified factors associated with one-month hospital readmission and mortality. RESULTS: 231 patients were included: 43 % of females, age (mean ± SD), 62.2 ± 15.9 yr, BMI, 23.5 ± 6.4, 73.6 % (170/231) were malnourished, of whom 66.5 % (113/170) had severe malnutrition, and 20.3 % (47/231) had diabetes. Malnutrition was diagnosed according to the three phenotypic criteria in 59/170 patients (34.7 %), two in 56/170 patients (33.1 %), and only one in 54/170 patients (31.8 %). The diabetic patients were less likely to have a low FFMI (29.8 % (14/47) vs 60.9 % (109/179), P < 0.001) or be malnourished (61.7 % (29/47) vs 76.6 % (141/184), P = 0.04), but more likely to have a low handgrip strength (64.3 % (27/42) vs 45.6 % (68/149), P = 0.03) than non-diabetic patients. Multivariable analyses showed that cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 2.51 [1.17-5.37], P = 0.02) and SEFI® score (OR = 0.89 [95 % confidence interval, 0.79-0.99], P = 0.04) were associated with higher risk of hospital readmission, whereas weight loss (OR = 3.20 [1.26-8.17], P = 0.01) and diabetes (OR = 2.76 [1.10-6.91], P = 0.03) were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: One third of patients were diagnosed malnutrition with one phenotypic criterion, suggesting that all the GLIM phenotypic criteria should be used to ensure the diagnosis of malnutrition. The diabetic patients had higher FFMI and lower handgrip strength than non-diabetic patients. In patients managed by NST, low food intake and cancer are associated with hospital readmission, while diabetes and weight loss with early mortality.
SN  - 2405-4577
ER  -