Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0EarthArXiv

Flood Exposure Assessment of Electrical Substations in Iowa Using Geospatial Service-Area and Influence-Zone Modeling

Abstract

Flooding poses a growing risk to electric substations, yet statewide assessments often fail to connect facility exposure with the spatial context of service territories, communities, built environments, and grid infrastructure. This study develops a data-driven geospatial framework to assess direct and indirect flood impacts on electrical substations across Iowa under 50-, 100-, and 500-year flood scenarios. The framework combines footprint-level inundation analysis with county aggregation, electric service boundaries (ESB), influence zones, demographic and energy-burden indicators, kernel density mapping, and allocation-sensitivity checks. Results show that exposed substations increase from 108 to 226 across the scenarios, with deeper and broader within-site inundation under larger events. Under the 500-year scenario, direct exposure affects 12.83% of substations, but affected service territories contain 66.27% of Iowa’s population, 68.03% of statewide building footprint area, and 46.59% of grid-line length. Influence zone results show that impacted substation-centered zones contain 20.51% of the statewide population and remain above the statewide energy-burden average. Exposure concentrates along eastern and southeastern Iowa near the Mississippi corridor, extends into western and northwestern border transmission corridors, and appears as a strong urban built-environment hotspot in Polk County. Sensitivity results show that building-area exposure is the most transferable indicator between ESB and influence frameworks, while grid-line exposure is more boundary-dependent. The framework identifies priority substations where flood exposure intersects with broader regional consequence potential.

Related

  1. Multisource Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis of Vineyard Wildfire Impacts and Exposure: The 2019 Kincade Fire
    Parastoo Farajpoor, Mahla Ardebili Pour, Mohammad Bagher Ghiasi +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  2. A Multi‐Method Geospatial Framework for Drought Risk Assessment in the GAP Region (Türkiye): Trend Analysis, Dry‐Spell Persistence and Random Forest Forecasting
    Mehmet Ali Çelik
    EcohydrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY8 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  3. Damage Assessment of Supporting Pillars in an Underground Cave Using Joint Inversion of Electrical Resistivity and P-wave Velocity, Burgundy (France)
    Aurore Carrier, P. Bottelin, L. Fabre +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  4. Chemical Alternatives Assessment: Progress and Perspectives in Hazard Characterization, Exposure Assessment, and Life Cycle Assessment
    Yipeng Lu, Xiaoqian Chen, Pin Gao
    Journal of xenobioticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  5. Influence of food density on Daphnia pulex life history during a multigenerational exposure to external gamma radiation
    Pierre Techer, Isabelle Cavalié, Virginie Camilleri +3
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyPeer-reviewedCC BYEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@misc{duran2026flood,
  title = {{Flood Exposure Assessment of Electrical Substations in Iowa Using Geospatial Service-Area and Influence-Zone Modeling}},
  author = {Ege Duran and Omer Mermer and Ibrahim Demir},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31223/x5s23c},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15731/},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Flood Exposure Assessment of Electrical Substations in Iowa Using Geospatial Service-Area and Influence-Zone Modeling
AU  - Ege Duran
AU  - Omer Mermer
AU  - Ibrahim Demir
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/24
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5s23c
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15731/
AB  - Flooding poses a growing risk to electric substations, yet statewide assessments often fail to connect facility exposure with the spatial context of service territories, communities, built environments, and grid infrastructure. This study develops a data-driven geospatial framework to assess direct and indirect flood impacts on electrical substations across Iowa under 50-, 100-, and 500-year flood scenarios. The framework combines footprint-level inundation analysis with county aggregation, electric service boundaries (ESB), influence zones, demographic and energy-burden indicators, kernel density mapping, and allocation-sensitivity checks. Results show that exposed substations increase from 108 to 226 across the scenarios, with deeper and broader within-site inundation under larger events. Under the 500-year scenario, direct exposure affects 12.83% of substations, but affected service territories contain 66.27% of Iowa’s population, 68.03% of statewide building footprint area, and 46.59% of grid-line length. Influence zone results show that impacted substation-centered zones contain 20.51% of the statewide population and remain above the statewide energy-burden average. Exposure concentrates along eastern and southeastern Iowa near the Mississippi corridor, extends into western and northwestern border transmission corridors, and appears as a strong urban built-environment hotspot in Polk County. Sensitivity results show that building-area exposure is the most transferable indicator between ESB and influence frameworks, while grid-line exposure is more boundary-dependent. The framework identifies priority substations where flood exposure intersects with broader regional consequence potential.
ER  -