Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Learnt Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution under Channel Noise and Device Drift

Abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) links are provisioned from security analyses of stationary channels, whereas the devices that determine the channel drift between recalibrations. Whether an eavesdropper who cannot alter the channel's own noise gains by following that drift has not been quantified. Adaptive eavesdropping is posed here as a constrained Markov decision process in which the attacker selects one circuit per round while the noise level follows an Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process and the abort condition is a budget over each block of rounds. The value of adaptation is bounded by the best fixed circuit and a dynamic-programming upper bound. The actions are learnt attacks. Whereas Decker et al. trained a parametrised circuit on a fixed gate template against a fixed channel, here the gate structure and rotation angles are searched jointly. This yields circuits compact enough to form a discrete action set, extending the construction to noise models lacking a known template, including the amplitude damping channel. On device-independent E91 under bilateral depolarising noise, a reinforcement-learning attacker raises her Holevo information from $0.135$ for the best fixed circuit to $0.348$ at zero detection, 98% of the upper bound. On BB84 under a drifting bit-flip channel, she exceeds a conservative noise-indexed rule by $0.024$ in fidelity, reaching 99% of the upper bound. Under stationary noise, the attacker's gain from basis asymmetry changes sign between an averaged and a per-basis error-rate constraint. The search, started from random gate sequences, recovers the analytical cloners and the collective-attack key rate, and meets the lower bound of the Winick--Lütkenhaus--Coles objective from above.

Related

  1. Computing key rates for one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution
    Andreas Bluhm, Gereon Koßmann, Martin Sandfuchs +3
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textMathematical physicsOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. Safety Verification for Voltage Control in Inverter Dominated Radial Distribution Networks under Actuator and Sensor Adversarial Attacks
    Georgios Pantazis, Revi Boelen, Michelle S. Chong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Universal CKM for Environment-Aware Wireless Networks: Enabling Cross-Device and Cross-Task Channel Knowledge Transfer
    Haiquan Lu, Yong Zeng, Cheng-Xiang Wang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Deep-learning side-channel analysis of embedded ML-KEM: Single-trace message recovery, cross-device generalization, and frequency-band leakage characterization
    Chung-Wei Kuo, Yu-I Hung, Kai-Lun Lin
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryPLOSPMC
  5. The Cauchy–Modified Garima Distribution: Applications to Device Lifetimes and Aircraft Windshield Failures
    Ayşe Metin Karakaş, Fatma Bulut, Murat Karakaş
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0StatisticsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{mordarski2026learnt,
  title = {{Learnt Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution under Channel Noise and Device Drift}},
  author = {Marcel Mordarski and Benjamin Gras and Abdelrahman Shehata and Daniel Budina and Roberto Bondesan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01792},
  eprint = {2610.01792},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01792},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Learnt Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution under Channel Noise and Device Drift
AU  - Marcel Mordarski
AU  - Benjamin Gras
AU  - Abdelrahman Shehata
AU  - Daniel Budina
AU  - Roberto Bondesan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01792
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01792
AB  - Quantum key distribution (QKD) links are provisioned from security analyses of stationary channels, whereas the devices that determine the channel drift between recalibrations. Whether an eavesdropper who cannot alter the channel's own noise gains by following that drift has not been quantified. Adaptive eavesdropping is posed here as a constrained Markov decision process in which the attacker selects one circuit per round while the noise level follows an Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process and the abort condition is a budget over each block of rounds. The value of adaptation is bounded by the best fixed circuit and a dynamic-programming upper bound. The actions are learnt attacks. Whereas Decker et al. trained a parametrised circuit on a fixed gate template against a fixed channel, here the gate structure and rotation angles are searched jointly. This yields circuits compact enough to form a discrete action set, extending the construction to noise models lacking a known template, including the amplitude damping channel. On device-independent E91 under bilateral depolarising noise, a reinforcement-learning attacker raises her Holevo information from $0.135$ for the best fixed circuit to $0.348$ at zero detection, 98% of the upper bound. On BB84 under a drifting bit-flip channel, she exceeds a conservative noise-indexed rule by $0.024$ in fidelity, reaching 99% of the upper bound. Under stationary noise, the attacker's gain from basis asymmetry changes sign between an averaged and a per-basis error-rate constraint. The search, started from random gate sequences, recovers the analytical cloners and the collective-attack key rate, and meets the lower bound of the Winick--Lütkenhaus--Coles objective from above.
ER  -