Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Early-Buyer Groups and Fast-Wallet Teams on a Bonding-Curve Launchpad: A Prospective Measurement Study of pump.fun on Solana

Abstract

We study coordinated groups of wallets on a bonding-curve launchpad (pump.fun on Solana), using a complete record of 200\,443 token launches, 15\,854\,121 curve trades and 51\,025\,958 SOL transfers over 88.3 hours. A prospective, multi-channel discovery procedure (co-buying, shared funding, joint signing, transfers, consolidation) yields 23\,710 wallet groups. Without ground-truth labels we validate them by out-of-sample link prediction, independent non-trading links and a comparison with naive co-buy clustering at equal numbers of flagged tokens: raw clustering collapses into one giant component, yet it ranks tokens at least as well as the groups, so the value of the structure is descriptive. Group activity is highly concentrated and splits into serial creators and long-lived rings of early buyers. Known members buy earlier than other buyers of the same token and extract more cash than an activity-matched placebo set, while late buyers' net cash flow is negative; tokens with members show a pump-like price path, but the contrast vanishes when controls are restricted to comparable tokens, so we report it as an association. A follower entering at the earliest group signal loses money out of sample in all 32 configurations and does no better than random entry. A few pools of tens to over a hundred fast wallets are associated with a two- to four-fold higher chance of reaching 20 SOL, also within creators, with a smaller excess at 60 SOL and none for graduation; on a final hold-out the team rules keep a precision of about one half to three quarters, yet many signals arrive when the curve already holds 20 SOL, one team supplies most of them, and they add no information beyond early curve state. We also document evaluation errors that turn the same data into apparent profit.

Related

  1. On the description of chemical bonding using the electrostatic potential. I. Theoretical introduction and covalent interactions
    Goedele Roos, Jane S Murray
    The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsHAL
  2. Compact Single-Axis Optical Gyroscope Transceiver Based On Photonic Wire Bonding Technique
    tongtong yang, Xuejie Gao, Jie Chai +3
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  3. Predictions of superconducting properties from chemical bonding interactions
    Francesco Belli, Trinidad Novoa, Ion Errea +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. First-Principles Study of Magnetism, Electronic Structure, and Bonding in Nb-Mn-Ge Kagome Compounds
    Wei-Shen Tee, Shiya Chen, Weiyi Xia +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Chemical bonding concepts emerge naturally from maximally entangled atomic orbitals
    Lexin Ding, Eduard Matito, Christian Schilling
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text8 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{gafarov2026earlybuyer,
  title = {{Early-Buyer Groups and Fast-Wallet Teams on a Bonding-Curve Launchpad: A Prospective Measurement Study of pump.fun on Solana}},
  author = {Fail Gafarov},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.39458},
  eprint = {2610.39458},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39458},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Early-Buyer Groups and Fast-Wallet Teams on a Bonding-Curve Launchpad: A Prospective Measurement Study of pump.fun on Solana
AU  - Fail Gafarov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.39458
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39458
AB  - We study coordinated groups of wallets on a bonding-curve launchpad (pump.fun on Solana), using a complete record of 200\,443 token launches, 15\,854\,121 curve trades and 51\,025\,958 SOL transfers over 88.3 hours. A prospective, multi-channel discovery procedure (co-buying, shared funding, joint signing, transfers, consolidation) yields 23\,710 wallet groups. Without ground-truth labels we validate them by out-of-sample link prediction, independent non-trading links and a comparison with naive co-buy clustering at equal numbers of flagged tokens: raw clustering collapses into one giant component, yet it ranks tokens at least as well as the groups, so the value of the structure is descriptive. Group activity is highly concentrated and splits into serial creators and long-lived rings of early buyers. Known members buy earlier than other buyers of the same token and extract more cash than an activity-matched placebo set, while late buyers' net cash flow is negative; tokens with members show a pump-like price path, but the contrast vanishes when controls are restricted to comparable tokens, so we report it as an association. A follower entering at the earliest group signal loses money out of sample in all 32 configurations and does no better than random entry. A few pools of tens to over a hundred fast wallets are associated with a two- to four-fold higher chance of reaching 20 SOL, also within creators, with a smaller excess at 60 SOL and none for graduation; on a final hold-out the team rules keep a precision of about one half to three quarters, yet many signals arrive when the curve already holds 20 SOL, one team supplies most of them, and they add no information beyond early curve state. We also document evaluation errors that turn the same data into apparent profit.
ER  -