Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
188,932 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Eco-anxiety as a public health imperative: from individual resilience to culturally informed holistic engagement

6 affiliations
  1. 1Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Industrial Economics
  2. 2School of Foreign Languages, Sichuan University of Arts and Science
  3. 3School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University
  4. 4Business School, Guangdong Business and Technology University
  5. 5School of Foreign Languages, Chengdu Normal University
  6. 6School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong Business and Technology University

Abstract

Eco-anxiety has increasingly drawn public health attention. Although often conceptualized as an individual psychological burden, eco-anxiety may also serve as a catalyst for collective action. However, prevailing coping strategies largely center on individual resilience, with insufficient focus on social connectedness and the human-nature bond. This narrative review critically examines the limitations of individual resilience as a coping mechanism for eco-anxiety and advocates for a paradigm shift toward holistic engagement informed by Indigenous knowledge systems and traditional Chinese philosophy. Evidence indicates that eco-anxiety disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including Indigenous groups, women, and youth; yet most research remains Western-centric and individually oriented. While beneficial for personal mental health, individual resilience often overlooks the systemic and sociopolitical drivers of ecological distress, potentially intensifying feelings of isolation and helplessness. In contrast, holistic engagement emphasizes reciprocal human-nature relationships, social connectivity, and collective action, offering more enduring coping mechanisms. Addressing eco-anxiety as a public health issue requires moving beyond individual resilience toward culturally attuned, holistic, and collective strategies. Integrating Indigenous and Chinese philosophical insights into mental health interventions may promote environmental stewardship, social cohesion, and emotional wellbeing, particularly for vulnerable populations disproportionately affected by ecological crises.

Related

  1. Mental health, resilience, and culturally congruent care among Muslim and Arab American women in the United States: a scoping review
    Lina Mohammad
    Frontiers in global women's healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. From resilience to sumud: rethinking psychotherapy beyond individual recovery in contexts of enduring adversity
    Dina Aly El-Gabry, Iffat Elbarazi, Emmanuel Stip +4
    The Lancet Regional Health - Eastern MediterraneanPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  3. Longitudinal relationships between physical exercise, psychological resilience, and academic engagement in Chinese university students: a random-intercept cross-lagged panel study
    Yuankai Qiao, Haibin Liu
    Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPMC
  4. Applying Trauma‐Informed Principles to Support Learner Engagement and Wellbeing in UK Undergraduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study
    Helen West, Dominic Johnson
    The Clinical TeacherPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  5. Risk and protective factors for posttraumatic stress disorder among Israeli civilians in the aftermath of 7 October: the TERUMAH (Trauma, Civic Engagement, Resilience and Health) study
    Sharon Stein Merkin, Liat Orenstein, Teresa E. Seeman +2
    European Journal of PsychotraumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{du2026ecoanxiety,
  title = {{Eco-anxiety as a public health imperative: from individual resilience to culturally informed holistic engagement}},
  author = {Jiapeng Du and Jiangwei Xie and Jinwen Xu and Xiaoyuan Li and Shicun Qiu and Qi Li and Jiacun Qiu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921690},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921690/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Eco-anxiety as a public health imperative: from individual resilience to culturally informed holistic engagement
AU  - Jiapeng Du
AU  - Jiangwei Xie
AU  - Jinwen Xu
AU  - Xiaoyuan Li
AU  - Shicun Qiu
AU  - Qi Li
AU  - Jiacun Qiu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921690
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921690/full
AB  - Eco-anxiety has increasingly drawn public health attention. Although often conceptualized as an individual psychological burden, eco-anxiety may also serve as a catalyst for collective action. However, prevailing coping strategies largely center on individual resilience, with insufficient focus on social connectedness and the human-nature bond. This narrative review critically examines the limitations of individual resilience as a coping mechanism for eco-anxiety and advocates for a paradigm shift toward holistic engagement informed by Indigenous knowledge systems and traditional Chinese philosophy. Evidence indicates that eco-anxiety disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, including Indigenous groups, women, and youth; yet most research remains Western-centric and individually oriented. While beneficial for personal mental health, individual resilience often overlooks the systemic and sociopolitical drivers of ecological distress, potentially intensifying feelings of isolation and helplessness. In contrast, holistic engagement emphasizes reciprocal human-nature relationships, social connectivity, and collective action, offering more enduring coping mechanisms. Addressing eco-anxiety as a public health issue requires moving beyond individual resilience toward culturally attuned, holistic, and collective strategies. Integrating Indigenous and Chinese philosophical insights into mental health interventions may promote environmental stewardship, social cohesion, and emotional wellbeing, particularly for vulnerable populations disproportionately affected by ecological crises.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -