Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Comment on "Andreev Reflection to Probe Momentum-Dependent Spin Polarization in Altermagnet CrSb"

Abstract

Zhang et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 016701 (2026)] report momentum-dependent spin polarization in the altermagnet CrSb from point-contact Andreev reflection along the (0001), (-1-120), and (10-10) directions. We show that the Andreev spin polarization they claim to measure is forbidden by symmetry: it vanishes identically in the diffusive regime for all directions in CrSb, and in the ballistic regime for two of the three orientations measured. It is allowed only along one direction, where the calculated band structure gives ~50%. The large, nearly isotropic values reported follow from an incorrect definition of ballistic Andreev spin polarization that evaluates the spin asymmetry at fixed three-dimensional momentum; the Andreev selection rule is local only in the momentum component parallel to the interface. Moreover, the ballistic regime is not demonstrated, and the fitting procedure is flawed.

Related

  1. Equal-Spin local and nonlocal Andreev reflection in altermagnet/superconductor/altermagnet junction
    Kai-Yi Lyu, Xing Wang, Yu-Xian Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Comment on "The polarization hierarchy for polynomial optimization over convex bodies, with applications to nonnegative matrix rank"
    Julius A. Zeiss
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Reflection of forward volume exchange spin waves at ferromagnetic junctions interpreted via continuity of angular momentum density flux
    Luis Sánchez-Tejerina, Luis M. Moreno-Ramírez, Óscar Alejos Ducal
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Comment on "Non-Monotonicity of Transverse-Momentum Correlations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC"
    Roy A. Lacey
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsNuclear physicsarXiv
  5. Termination-dependent surface Fermiology in the intercalated altermagnet CoNb 4 Se 8
    Pietro Maria Forcella, Alessandro de Vita, Matthew Watson +20
    Nano LettersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCondensed matterHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mazin2026comment,
  title = {{Comment on "Andreev Reflection to Probe Momentum-Dependent Spin Polarization in Altermagnet CrSb"}},
  author = {Igor I. Mazin and Maxim Khodas and Boris Nadgorny},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25357},
  eprint = {2609.25357},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25357},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Comment on "Andreev Reflection to Probe Momentum-Dependent Spin Polarization in Altermagnet CrSb"
AU  - Igor I. Mazin
AU  - Maxim Khodas
AU  - Boris Nadgorny
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25357
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25357
AB  - Zhang et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 016701 (2026)] report momentum-dependent spin polarization in the altermagnet CrSb from point-contact Andreev reflection along the (0001), (-1-120), and (10-10) directions. We show that the Andreev spin polarization they claim to measure is forbidden by symmetry: it vanishes identically in the diffusive regime for all directions in CrSb, and in the ballistic regime for two of the three orientations measured. It is allowed only along one direction, where the calculated band structure gives ~50%. The large, nearly isotropic values reported follow from an incorrect definition of ballistic Andreev spin polarization that evaluates the spin asymmetry at fixed three-dimensional momentum; the Andreev selection rule is local only in the momentum component parallel to the interface. Moreover, the ballistic regime is not demonstrated, and the fitting procedure is flawed.
ER  -