Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.
29 affiliations
- 1Department of Public Health, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 2Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 3Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 4Department of Neurology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
- 5Department of Neurology, AZ Alma, Eeklo, Belgium.
- 6Department of IT and Care, Jan Yperman Hospital, Ypres, Belgium.
- 7Department of Quality Management, AZ Glorieux, Ronse, Belgium.
- 8Department of Neurology, AZ Sint Blasius, Dendermonde, Belgium.
- 9Department of Neurology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
- 10Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
- 11NEUR Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
- 12Department of Neurology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
- 13Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- 14Department of Neurology, RZ Heilig Hart, Tienen, Belgium.
- 15Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
- 16Department of Neurology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
- 17Department of Nursing and Paramedics, AZ Sint Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium.
- 18Department of Neurology, Kliniek Sint Jan, Brussels, Belgium.
- 19Department of Neurology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Bruges, Belgium.
- 20Department of Neurology, AZ Mol, Mol, Belgium.
- 21Department of Neurology, AZ Oostend, Ostend, Belgium.
- 22Department of Neurology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
- 23Neurovascular Center and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium.
- 24Research Group on Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
- 25Department of Quality Management, Sint-Franciscus Ziekenhuis, Heusden-Zolder, Belgium.
- 26Department of Neurology, ZAS Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium.
- 27Department of Nursing and Paramedics, AZ Sint Elisabeth, Zottegem, Belgium.
- 28Department of Neurology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.
- 29Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
Introduction
Adherence to guidelines for stroke care varies, despite evidence that managing fever, glycemia (sugar), and conducting swallowing screening (FeSS) reduces mortality and disability. We established a quality improvement collaborative to improve care processes for ischemic stroke, with a focus on these three recommendations. We then added two additional care process activities: screening for activities of daily living (ADL) and depression, collectively defined as FeSS⁺.Methods
In this multicenter intervention study (n = 24), we retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive patient records per center of ischemic stroke patients in 2019, pre-intervention (measurement period 1 [MP1]), and in 2022, post-intervention (measurement period 2 [MP2]). All hospitals received feedback on their MP1 performance, and an optional e-learning tool on FeSS⁺ was also offered. We compared adherence between MP1 and MP2 and assessed the impact of the e-learning tool.Results
Data were collected from 580 patients during MP1 and 588 patients during MP2. E-learning tools were delivered to teams at 18 hospitals (75%). Adherence improved for temperature measurement (18 to 25%, p = 0.004) and swallowing screening (36 to 59%, p < 0.001). No significant changes were observed for glycemia, ADL, or depression screening. Improvements in adherence to glycemia management, swallowing screening, and depression screening were observed only among hospitals that disseminated the e-learning tool (p = 0.01, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). Temperature measurement improved more in hospitals without e-learning (OR 2.62 vs. 1.27; p = 0.03).Discussion
We observed improvements in measuring temperature and swallowing screening after receiving feedback. The dissemination of the e-learning tool was associated with increased adherence to glycemic measurement, swallowing screening, and depression screening, underscoring the role of specific interventions. However, overall adherence remained low, highlighting the need for continued quality improvement.
Related
- Determinants of MoCA improvement in post-ischemic stroke patients receiving acupuncture: a retrospective study
- Effects of collaborative clinical visit agenda-setting interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- From Evidence to Intervention: A Systematic, Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Developing and Prioritizing Diagnostic Excellence Interventions Across a 14-Site Hospital Medicine Collaborative
- Sex-specific clinical profiles in patients with acute ischemic stroke and chronic kidney disease
- District-Level Quality Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Indonesia
BibTeX
@article{lens2026specific,
title = {{Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.}},
author = {Charlotte Lens and Ellen Coeckelberghs and Deborah Seys and Kris Vanhaecht and Kim Bekelaar and Roel Blondia and Tom Bogaert and Laura Boutens and Joke Caudron and Romina Demontis and Sylvie De Raedt and Laurens Dobbels and Anneke Govaerts and Dimitri Hemelsoet and Marijke Huskens and Petra Olislaegers and Jean Francois Poma and Leen Sinnaeve and Charlotte Swinnen and Annelies Terwecoren and Peter Vanacker and Noa Vandevenne and Wendy Van Daele and Jens Van Elsuë and Jan Vynckier and Laetitia Yperzeele and Jelle Demeestere and Caroline Weltens and Robin Lemmens},
journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1830076},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903223},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Specific interventions as part of a quality improvement collaborative enhance care for ischemic stroke patients.
AU - Charlotte Lens
AU - Ellen Coeckelberghs
AU - Deborah Seys
AU - Kris Vanhaecht
AU - Kim Bekelaar
AU - Roel Blondia
AU - Tom Bogaert
AU - Laura Boutens
AU - Joke Caudron
AU - Romina Demontis
AU - Sylvie De Raedt
AU - Laurens Dobbels
AU - Anneke Govaerts
AU - Dimitri Hemelsoet
AU - Marijke Huskens
AU - Petra Olislaegers
AU - Jean Francois Poma
AU - Leen Sinnaeve
AU - Charlotte Swinnen
AU - Annelies Terwecoren
AU - Peter Vanacker
AU - Noa Vandevenne
AU - Wendy Van Daele
AU - Jens Van Elsuë
AU - Jan Vynckier
AU - Laetitia Yperzeele
AU - Jelle Demeestere
AU - Caroline Weltens
AU - Robin Lemmens
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Frontiers in neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1830076
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903223
AB - Introduction Adherence to guidelines for stroke care varies, despite evidence that managing fever, glycemia (sugar), and conducting swallowing screening (FeSS) reduces mortality and disability. We established a quality improvement collaborative to improve care processes for ischemic stroke, with a focus on these three recommendations. We then added two additional care process activities: screening for activities of daily living (ADL) and depression, collectively defined as FeSS⁺.Methods In this multicenter intervention study (n = 24), we retrospectively analyzed 30 consecutive patient records per center of ischemic stroke patients in 2019, pre-intervention (measurement period 1 [MP1]), and in 2022, post-intervention (measurement period 2 [MP2]). All hospitals received feedback on their MP1 performance, and an optional e-learning tool on FeSS⁺ was also offered. We compared adherence between MP1 and MP2 and assessed the impact of the e-learning tool.Results Data were collected from 580 patients during MP1 and 588 patients during MP2. E-learning tools were delivered to teams at 18 hospitals (75%). Adherence improved for temperature measurement (18 to 25%, p = 0.004) and swallowing screening (36 to 59%, p < 0.001). No significant changes were observed for glycemia, ADL, or depression screening. Improvements in adherence to glycemia management, swallowing screening, and depression screening were observed only among hospitals that disseminated the e-learning tool (p = 0.01, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). Temperature measurement improved more in hospitals without e-learning (OR 2.62 vs. 1.27; p = 0.03).Discussion We observed improvements in measuring temperature and swallowing screening after receiving feedback. The dissemination of the e-learning tool was associated with increased adherence to glycemic measurement, swallowing screening, and depression screening, underscoring the role of specific interventions. However, overall adherence remained low, highlighting the need for continued quality improvement.
SN - 1664-2295
ER -