Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYRSC advances

Carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon: life cycle assessment, environmental sustainability, and carbon-negative potential.

  1. 1Department of Chemistry, Edo State University, Iyamho, Uzairue Edo State Nigeria [email protected].

Abstract

Biomass-derived activated carbon has emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional fossil-based activated carbon owing to its renewable origin, excellent adsorption performance, and potential to support circular bioeconomy and climate mitigation strategies. However, its overall environmental sustainability depends not only on the renewable nature of biomass feedstocks but also on greenhouse gas emissions generated throughout production, utilization, regeneration, and end-of-life management. This review critically reviews the carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon from a life cycle perspective, emphasizing the influence of feedstock selection, production technologies, activation methods, transportation, energy consumption, and chemical utilization on environmental performance. The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon accounting frameworks for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions, identifying environmental hotspots, and evaluating carbon-negative potential is comprehensively discussed. Comparative analyses of diverse biomass feedstocks and recent experimental studies demonstrate that agricultural residues generally exhibit lower environmental burdens than fossil-derived precursors, although sustainability remains highly dependent on process design, regional energy systems, and methodological assumptions. Emerging applications in water purification, air pollution control, carbon dioxide capture, catalysis, energy storage, hydrogen storage, and soil carbon sequestration further illustrate the multifunctional role of biomass-derived activated carbon in sustainable development. Finally, current challenges, knowledge gaps, and future research priorities are highlighted to facilitate the development of low-carbon, resource-efficient, and industrially scalable activated carbon production systems.

Related

  1. Evaluation of sustainability of lubricants by life cycle assessment and carbon footprint measurement
    Gobinda Karmakar, Raj Shah, Mathew S. Roshan +1
    Discover EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  2. Environmental footprint of High-Throughput Screening technologies for enzyme discovery and engineering: a Life Cycle Assessment comparison
    Pablo Rodríguez-Mateos, Javier Sáez-Guinoa, Sara Lago-Olveira +1
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionChemRxiv
  3. Enhancement of water and environmental carrying capacity in a changing climate: a coupled assessment of ecological footprint, biocapacity, and water stress
    Elaheh Dastranj, Najmeh Mahjouri, Massoud Behboudian
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex
  4. Clarifying environmental responsibility for consistent absolute environmental sustainability assessment: A global sector-level analysis
    Gabin Guillemaud, Anthony Benoist, Éléonore Loiseau
    Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Food sustainability and sovereignty in tension: An integrated assessment of nutritional, environmental, and self-sufficiency dimensions in the French food supply
    Marianne Cerf, Hélène Fouillet, Dorra Ben Aissa +8
    Cleaner Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{ifijen2026carbon,
  title = {{Carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon: life cycle assessment, environmental sustainability, and carbon-negative potential.}},
  author = {Ikhazuagbe Hilary Ifijen},
  journal = {RSC advances},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1039/d6ra06867g},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898958},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon: life cycle assessment, environmental sustainability, and carbon-negative potential.
AU  - Ikhazuagbe Hilary Ifijen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - RSC advances
DO  - 10.1039/d6ra06867g
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898958
AB  - Biomass-derived activated carbon has emerged as a sustainable alternative to conventional fossil-based activated carbon owing to its renewable origin, excellent adsorption performance, and potential to support circular bioeconomy and climate mitigation strategies. However, its overall environmental sustainability depends not only on the renewable nature of biomass feedstocks but also on greenhouse gas emissions generated throughout production, utilization, regeneration, and end-of-life management. This review critically reviews the carbon footprint of biomass-derived activated carbon from a life cycle perspective, emphasizing the influence of feedstock selection, production technologies, activation methods, transportation, energy consumption, and chemical utilization on environmental performance. The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon accounting frameworks for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions, identifying environmental hotspots, and evaluating carbon-negative potential is comprehensively discussed. Comparative analyses of diverse biomass feedstocks and recent experimental studies demonstrate that agricultural residues generally exhibit lower environmental burdens than fossil-derived precursors, although sustainability remains highly dependent on process design, regional energy systems, and methodological assumptions. Emerging applications in water purification, air pollution control, carbon dioxide capture, catalysis, energy storage, hydrogen storage, and soil carbon sequestration further illustrate the multifunctional role of biomass-derived activated carbon in sustainable development. Finally, current challenges, knowledge gaps, and future research priorities are highlighted to facilitate the development of low-carbon, resource-efficient, and industrially scalable activated carbon production systems.
SN  - 2046-2069
ER  -