Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

First-principles optical response of shock-compressed LiF: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects

Abstract

We investigate the refractive index n of LiF using DFT+G0W0+BSE, with ionic-temperature effects included through QMD. We calculate photon-energy dispersions n(ω) and k(ω) at ambient pressure and n(ρ,T) at 532 and 1550 nm under shock compression, where ρ and T vary together. Quasiparticle band structures at ambient and compressed conditions and the ambient-pressure orbital-projected density of states connect the optical response to the electronic structure. At ambient pressure, G0W0 yields a quasiparticle gap of 14.25 eV, close to the experimental 14.2 eV, while BSE reproduces the main excitonic feature at 12.5 eV, close to the observed 12.6 eV. Quasiparticle and excitonic effects are thus essential for accurate optical dispersion; the hybrid HSE functional does not reproduce the optical spectra. Along the principal Hugoniot up to 140 GPa, n(ρ) agrees closely with shock data at 1550 nm and acceptably at 532 nm, and agrees better overall than earlier first-principles calculations. Above approximately 110-120 GPa, QMD produces a downturn relative to cold n(ρ) curves, suggesting that ionic dynamics may contribute to deviations from the linear n-ρ Gladstone-Dale relation. QMD-sampling and finite-k-grid uncertainties are estimated, and transition-peak broadening is assessed using a recently proposed criterion. The gap increases under pressure, with a transition to a Γ→L indirect gap near 50 GPa. An exploratory calculation at approximately 1400 GPa finds a gap of about 24 eV, disfavoring gap-closure metallization. Structural and elastic benchmarks of the underlying models are also provided.

Related

  1. A-site cation engineering of lead-free M2NiCl6 (M = Na, K, Cs) vacancy-ordered double perovskites: first-principles insights into stability, band-gap tuning, excitonic behavior, and optical response
    Md. Hasan Mia, Md. Abdul Momin, Arka Deb Nath +4
    RSC AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 3.0Full textGeneral chemistryPMC
  2. Engineering optoelectronic and excitonic properties in carbon quantum dots via defect encoding: a first-principles study
    Christian Ebere Enyoh, Qingyue Wang
    Computational Materials SciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text6 citedMaterials & polymersOpenAlex
  3. Excitonic Physics in Emerging 2D Semiconductors: A First-Principles Many-Body Perspective from Photodetection to Solar Energy Conversion
    Michele Re Fiorentin, Simone Grillo, Fulvio Paleari +3
    Nano LettersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersPMC
  4. Deposition-Dependent Excitonic Properties of Spin-Coated CsPbBr3 Thin Films Revealed by Temperature-Dependent Optical Spectroscopy.
    Carina Cabrera, Daniel L. Gau, Enzo L. Spera +10
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  5. Ligand Design Principles Enabling High Efficiency Aqueous Iron Electrodeposition at Ambient Temperature
    Jiang Luo, Shivam Singh, Yawei Gao +9
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{fadeev2026firstprinciples,
  title = {{First-principles optical response of shock-compressed LiF: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects}},
  author = {M. S. Fadeev},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.01512},
  eprint = {2609.01512},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01512},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - First-principles optical response of shock-compressed LiF: Quasiparticle, excitonic, and ionic-temperature effects
AU  - M. S. Fadeev
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.01512
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01512
AB  - We investigate the refractive index n of LiF using DFT+G_0W_0+BSE, with ionic-temperature effects included through QMD. We calculate photon-energy dispersions n(ω) and k(ω) at ambient pressure and n(ρ,T) at 532 and 1550 nm under shock compression, where ρ and T vary together. Quasiparticle band structures at ambient and compressed conditions and the ambient-pressure orbital-projected density of states connect the optical response to the electronic structure. At ambient pressure, G_0W_0 yields a quasiparticle gap of 14.25 eV, close to the experimental 14.2 eV, while BSE reproduces the main excitonic feature at 12.5 eV, close to the observed 12.6 eV. Quasiparticle and excitonic effects are thus essential for accurate optical dispersion; the hybrid HSE functional does not reproduce the optical spectra. Along the principal Hugoniot up to 140 GPa, n(ρ) agrees closely with shock data at 1550 nm and acceptably at 532 nm, and agrees better overall than earlier first-principles calculations. Above approximately 110-120 GPa, QMD produces a downturn relative to cold n(ρ) curves, suggesting that ionic dynamics may contribute to deviations from the linear n-ρ Gladstone-Dale relation. QMD-sampling and finite-k-grid uncertainties are estimated, and transition-peak broadening is assessed using a recently proposed criterion. The gap increases under pressure, with a transition to a Γ→L indirect gap near 50 GPa. An exploratory calculation at approximately 1400 GPa finds a gap of about 24 eV, disfavoring gap-closure metallization. Structural and elastic benchmarks of the underlying models are also provided.
ER  -