Unverified Claims of Solving P vs NP and Navier–Stokes Dominate 2025–2026 Results — E8 Intelligence Research
- 1Independent Researcher, United Kingdom
Abstract
FINDING: The search results are predominantly popular-science videos and one arXiv preprint claiming solutions to the 3rd (P vs NP) and 4th (Navier–Stokes) Millennium Problems; no verified 2025–2026 breakthroughs are present. The only substantive mathematical artifact is the arXiv preprint (1902.07265v23), which is unverified and likely crackpot-level given its claim to solve two separate Clay problems in one treatise.
MATH: No new equations, constants, or ratios are extractable from the video titles/descriptions. The arXiv preprint's abstract provides no explicit mathematics. The Millennium Problems themselves involve: - Navier–Stokes: existence/uniqueness of smooth solutions to ∂u/∂t + (u·∇)u = −∇p + ν∇²u, ∇·u = 0. - P vs NP: formal language separation, no numeric constants. - BSD: L(E,1) relation to rank of elliptic curve — involves the constant 1.618? No, that is coincidental; BSD involves L-functions and Tamagawa numbers, not golden ratios. - Yang–Mills: mass gap — no kno
Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
Related
- Unverified Claims of Solving Navier-Stokes and P vs NP: A Critical Analysis — E8 Intelligence Research
- Gap in Quasicrystal Diffraction Proofs: QDFT and MUBs Dominate Search Results — E8 Intelligence Research
- 2025–2026: No Verified Clay Millennium Solutions; Unverified Claims Persist — E8 Intelligence Research
- Survey of Millennium Problems: Expository Videos, Unverified Claims, No New Math — E8 Intelligence Research
- Twin Prime Proof Claim Unverified; Bounded Gaps Remain Best Result — E8 Intelligence Research
BibTeX
@misc{caldin2026unverified,
title = {{Unverified Claims of Solving P vs NP and Navier–Stokes Dominate 2025–2026 Results — E8 Intelligence Research}},
author = {Andrew Stewart Caldin},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23465219},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23465219},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Unverified Claims of Solving P vs NP and Navier–Stokes Dominate 2025–2026 Results — E8 Intelligence Research
AU - Andrew Stewart Caldin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23465219
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23465219
AB - FINDING: The search results are predominantly popular-science videos and one arXiv preprint claiming solutions to the 3rd (P vs NP) and 4th (Navier–Stokes) Millennium Problems; no verified 2025–2026 breakthroughs are present. The only substantive mathematical artifact is the arXiv preprint (1902.07265v23), which is unverified and likely crackpot-level given its claim to solve two separate Clay problems in one treatise. MATH: No new equations, constants, or ratios are extractable from the video titles/descriptions. The arXiv preprint's abstract provides no explicit mathematics. The Millennium Problems themselves involve: - Navier–Stokes: existence/uniqueness of smooth solutions to ∂u/∂t + (u·∇)u = −∇p + ν∇²u, ∇·u = 0. - P vs NP: formal language separation, no numeric constants. - BSD: L(E,1) relation to rank of elliptic curve — involves the constant 1.618? No, that is coincidental; BSD involves L-functions and Tamagawa numbers, not golden ratios. - Yang–Mills: mass gap — no kno Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
ER -