Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,578 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYKidney international reports

Distinct Pharmacodynamic Complement Biomarker Signatures Define Iptacopan and Pegcetacoplan Treatment in C3 Glomerulopathy.

2 more authors
  1. 1Molecular Otolaryngology and Renal Research Laboratories, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  2. 2Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Abstract

Introduction

C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is driven by alternative pathway (AP) dysregulation. Iptacopan inhibits factor B, whereas pegcetacoplan inhibits C3/C3b, suggesting distinct pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker profiles.Methods

We conducted an exploratory, nonrandomized observational cohort study of patients with biopsy-confirmed C3G treated with iptacopan (n = 9) or pegcetacoplan (n = 9), using paired pretreatment and approximately 3-month posttreatment samples. Complement activity, protein levels, activation products, autoantibodies, and genetic findings were assessed. Profiles were classified as PD-concordant (PDC), largely PD-concordant (LPDC), or PD-discordant (PDD) using treatment-specific signatures.Results

Both treatments suppressed AP activity and terminal pathway activation but produced distinct profiles. The expected PDC signature for iptacopan included increases in C3, factor B, C5, properdin, and CH50 and reductions in complement activation products (C3a, C3c, C3d, Bb, and sC5b-9). The expected pegcetacoplan signature included supranormal increases in C3, C3c, and properdin, reductions in C3a, C3d, Bb, and sC5b-9, and generally preserved or increased CH50. PDC profiles occurred in 6 of 9 patients in each cohort. LPDC profiles occurred in 3 iptacopan-treated patients, all nephritic factor-positive, and 2 pegcetacoplan-treated patients with nephritic factors or a likely pathogenic C3 variant. One patient with severe factor H deficiency showed a PDD profile during pegcetacoplan treatment and again in a descriptive posttransplant sample during subsequent iptacopan treatment.Conclusion

Iptacopan and pegcetacoplan produce distinct, mechanism-specific PD signatures in C3G. Pathway-based biomarker assessment may distinguish expected treatment effects from incomplete or discordant biochemical control. These categories describe PD patterns rather than clinical efficacy and require validation against clinical outcomes.

Related

  1. Lung FDG-PET is an early pharmacodynamic biomarker of antiviral efficacy in preclinical influenza
    C. B. L. Victorio, A. Ganasarajah, S. Gupta +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  2. Meta-analysis of brain and blood transcriptional signatures of neuroimmune dysregulation in Schizophrenia: convergent evidence for excessive complement system activity and CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis disruption
    Mohamed-Elmehdi Boughanmi, Louis-Ferdinand Lespine, Marion Leboyer +2
    Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  3. Abundant Glomerular Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in C3 Glomerulopathy
    K. O'Sullivan, p. khandelwal, P. D. Walker +2
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  4. Digital Ischemia as a Rare Manifestation of C3 Glomerulopathy Associated With Monoclonal Gammopathy
    Alistair Baber, Paul Legendre, Sophie Chauvet +10
    Kidney International ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text3 citedImmunologyHAL
  5. HEMÓLISE EXTRAVASCULAR PERSISTENTE NA HEMOGLOBINÚRIA PAROXÍSTICA NOTURNA: TRANSIÇÃO DE ECULIZUMABE PARA PEGCETACOPLAN
    Isadora DIAS LORENZINI, Bibiana JACQUES SCHWAAB, Érica ZORZI TREMEA +4
    Hematology, Transfusion and Cell TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026distinct,
  title = {{Distinct Pharmacodynamic Complement Biomarker Signatures Define Iptacopan and Pegcetacoplan Treatment in C3 Glomerulopathy.}},
  author = {Yuzhou Zhang and Héctor Martín Merinero and Anna R Carmen and Kameron Kruger and Renee X Goodfellow and Dingwu Shao and Sarah M Roberts and Angela F M Nelson and Nicole C Meyer Horning and Sydney S Jellison and Didier Mandelbrot and Neetika Garg and Carla M Nester and Richard J H Smith},
  journal = {Kidney international reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107087},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898424},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Distinct Pharmacodynamic Complement Biomarker Signatures Define Iptacopan and Pegcetacoplan Treatment in C3 Glomerulopathy.
AU  - Yuzhou Zhang
AU  - Héctor Martín Merinero
AU  - Anna R Carmen
AU  - Kameron Kruger
AU  - Renee X Goodfellow
AU  - Dingwu Shao
AU  - Sarah M Roberts
AU  - Angela F M Nelson
AU  - Nicole C Meyer Horning
AU  - Sydney S Jellison
AU  - Didier Mandelbrot
AU  - Neetika Garg
AU  - Carla M Nester
AU  - Richard J H Smith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
JO  - Kidney international reports
DO  - 10.1016/j.ekir.2026.107087
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898424
AB  - Introduction  C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is driven by alternative pathway (AP) dysregulation. Iptacopan inhibits factor B, whereas pegcetacoplan inhibits C3/C3b, suggesting distinct pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker profiles.Methods  We conducted an exploratory, nonrandomized observational cohort study of patients with biopsy-confirmed C3G treated with iptacopan (n = 9) or pegcetacoplan (n = 9), using paired pretreatment and approximately 3-month posttreatment samples. Complement activity, protein levels, activation products, autoantibodies, and genetic findings were assessed. Profiles were classified as PD-concordant (PDC), largely PD-concordant (LPDC), or PD-discordant (PDD) using treatment-specific signatures.Results  Both treatments suppressed AP activity and terminal pathway activation but produced distinct profiles. The expected PDC signature for iptacopan included increases in C3, factor B, C5, properdin, and CH50 and reductions in complement activation products (C3a, C3c, C3d, Bb, and sC5b-9). The expected pegcetacoplan signature included supranormal increases in C3, C3c, and properdin, reductions in C3a, C3d, Bb, and sC5b-9, and generally preserved or increased CH50. PDC profiles occurred in 6 of 9 patients in each cohort. LPDC profiles occurred in 3 iptacopan-treated patients, all nephritic factor-positive, and 2 pegcetacoplan-treated patients with nephritic factors or a likely pathogenic C3 variant. One patient with severe factor H deficiency showed a PDD profile during pegcetacoplan treatment and again in a descriptive posttransplant sample during subsequent iptacopan treatment.Conclusion  Iptacopan and pegcetacoplan produce distinct, mechanism-specific PD signatures in C3G. Pathway-based biomarker assessment may distinguish expected treatment effects from incomplete or discordant biochemical control. These categories describe PD patterns rather than clinical efficacy and require validation against clinical outcomes.
SN  - 2468-0249
ER  -