Standardising Pleural Management in Suspected Malignant Pleural Effusion Using a Structured Pre-Test Probability and RED Score-Guided Proforma: A Single-Centre Before-and-After Quality Improvement Project.
- 1Respiratory Medicine, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, GBR.
- 2General Medicine, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, GBR.
Abstract
Background The management of suspected malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is often variable, with many patients undergoing repeated pleural aspirations before a definitive management decision is made. The RED (respiratory rate, effusion depth and dyspnoea) score is a recently derived and validated tool that predicts the time to the next pleural fluid drainage procedure. We describe a single-center, before-and-after quality improvement project (QIP) evaluating the introduction of a structured proforma incorporating clinical pre-test probability and the RED score into routine pleural clinic assessment. Methods A retrospective baseline cycle (Cycle 1, n=48) was compared with a prospective intervention cycle (Cycle 2, n=26) following the implementation of a structured assessment pro forma. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing unplanned emergency admission or earlier-than-planned pleural clinic review within three months of the index pleural procedure. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients requiring more than two pleural procedures and the proportion of patients achieving definitive pleural management within three months. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test given the small sample sizes; results are presented with risk differences, 95% confidence intervals, and odds ratios where calculable. No a priori power calculation was performed, and this exploratory before-and-after design does not permit causal inferences. Results In Cycle 1, 16/48 patients (33.3%) experienced an emergency admission or unplanned pleural clinic review, compared with 2/26 (7.7%) in Cycle 2 (Fisher's exact test, P=0.021; risk difference -25.6%, 95% CI -42.5 to -8.8; odds ratio 6.0). The proportion of patients requiring more than two pleural procedures fell from 33.3% to 22.7% (P=0.415, not statistically significant). Cytology was positive in 24/48 (50.0%) Cycle 1 patients and 10/26 (38.5%) Cycle 2 patients. The two cohorts differed descriptively in performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥2:41.7% vs. 87.5%, P<0.001) and malignancy type distribution. RED scores were documented only anecdotally within free-text clinical notes for a subset of Cycle 2 patients and were not systematically recorded or analyzed as a distribution. Conclusions A structured pleural assessment pathway was associated with a statistically significant reduction in emergency presentations and a non-significant reduction in repeated procedures. However, given the small, single-center, non-randomised, uncontrolled before-and-after design, differing case mix between cohorts, and incomplete RED score documentation, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. They support further, larger, multicenter evaluations rather than immediate wider adoption.
Related
- Standardising Emollient Prescribing in Critically Ill Patients: A Quality Improvement Project
- Clinical and radiographic improvement in suspected pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis-associated hypoxemic respiratory failure following iruplinalkib-based treatment in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma after sequential treatment with ensartinib and lorlatinib: a two-patient case report
- Suspected Pentalogy of Cantrell With Ectopia Cordis in a Newborn: Diagnostic and Management Challenges in a Low Resource Setting in Northern Tanzania.
- Longitudinal Improvement in Waist-to-Height Ratio During SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy Within a Structured Multidisciplinary Care Model: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study
- Improving Blood Pressure Control Post Emergency Department Visit Through Structured Patient Education and Telephone Follow-up: A Quality Improvement Initiative
BibTeX
@article{fadel2026standardising,
title = {{Standardising Pleural Management in Suspected Malignant Pleural Effusion Using a Structured Pre-Test Probability and RED Score-Guided Proforma: A Single-Centre Before-and-After Quality Improvement Project.}},
author = {Ahmed R Fadel and Hashim Al-Sarirreh and Alma Alrayyes and Narendra Chinnappa},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116793},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921227},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Standardising Pleural Management in Suspected Malignant Pleural Effusion Using a Structured Pre-Test Probability and RED Score-Guided Proforma: A Single-Centre Before-and-After Quality Improvement Project.
AU - Ahmed R Fadel
AU - Hashim Al-Sarirreh
AU - Alma Alrayyes
AU - Narendra Chinnappa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/23
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116793
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921227
AB - Background The management of suspected malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is often variable, with many patients undergoing repeated pleural aspirations before a definitive management decision is made. The RED (respiratory rate, effusion depth and dyspnoea) score is a recently derived and validated tool that predicts the time to the next pleural fluid drainage procedure. We describe a single-center, before-and-after quality improvement project (QIP) evaluating the introduction of a structured proforma incorporating clinical pre-test probability and the RED score into routine pleural clinic assessment. Methods A retrospective baseline cycle (Cycle 1, n=48) was compared with a prospective intervention cycle (Cycle 2, n=26) following the implementation of a structured assessment pro forma. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing unplanned emergency admission or earlier-than-planned pleural clinic review within three months of the index pleural procedure. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients requiring more than two pleural procedures and the proportion of patients achieving definitive pleural management within three months. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test given the small sample sizes; results are presented with risk differences, 95% confidence intervals, and odds ratios where calculable. No a priori power calculation was performed, and this exploratory before-and-after design does not permit causal inferences. Results In Cycle 1, 16/48 patients (33.3%) experienced an emergency admission or unplanned pleural clinic review, compared with 2/26 (7.7%) in Cycle 2 (Fisher's exact test, P=0.021; risk difference -25.6%, 95% CI -42.5 to -8.8; odds ratio 6.0). The proportion of patients requiring more than two pleural procedures fell from 33.3% to 22.7% (P=0.415, not statistically significant). Cytology was positive in 24/48 (50.0%) Cycle 1 patients and 10/26 (38.5%) Cycle 2 patients. The two cohorts differed descriptively in performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥2:41.7% vs. 87.5%, P<0.001) and malignancy type distribution. RED scores were documented only anecdotally within free-text clinical notes for a subset of Cycle 2 patients and were not systematically recorded or analyzed as a distribution. Conclusions A structured pleural assessment pathway was associated with a statistically significant reduction in emergency presentations and a non-significant reduction in repeated procedures. However, given the small, single-center, non-randomised, uncontrolled before-and-after design, differing case mix between cohorts, and incomplete RED score documentation, these findings should be regarded as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. They support further, larger, multicenter evaluations rather than immediate wider adoption.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -