Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Protecting workers from Algorithmic Management: a theoretical framework for four key protection factors

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University
  2. 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  3. 3Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine
  4. 4Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University Health System

Abstract

Algorithmic Management (AM) is increasingly being linked to adverse occupational health outcomes. Although previous research has focused on the risks generated by AM, the protective factors that mitigate these risks remain theoretically underdeveloped. Drawing on the self-determination theory, social acceleration theory, surveillance capitalism theory, and the human oversight provisions of the EU AI Act, this study identifies and theoretically operationalises four protection factors in AM environments: Decision Autonomy, Pace Control, Feedback Transparency, and Loop Presence. By applying the Layers of Protection Analysis model, we argue that each factor functions as an independent protective barrier against AM-related health risks. Together, they form an integrated framework with direct implications for worker health measurements, algorithmic system designs, and occupational health policies. A conceptual six-step procedure for translating the framework into workplace assessment is also outlined.

Related

  1. Factors associated with the quality of urban geriatric healthcare services empowered by large language models and improvement pathways: a theoretical framework and cross-sectional study
    Xiaoyan Qi, Xuejiao Song, Jingkai Xu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Global Protective Ventilator Settings Are Not Regional Protection: A Compartment-Resolved Framework for Personalizing Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. A Systematic Review and Theoretical Framework of Stress Generation in Daily Life
    Peter Haehner, Rosalie Andrae, Wiebke Bleidorn
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. From Treating to Preventing Distress through Psychological Prehabilitation – A Novel Theoretical Framework
    Michael Baliousis, Lauren Charlotte Heathcote, Chloe Grimmett +5
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. Adapting an Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program for Gout (IMAP-Gout): A Theory-Informed Pre-Implementation Analysis Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
    Fatima Tahir, Hossai Gul, Sacha Bossina +4
    International journal of rheumatic diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{lee2026protecting,
  title = {{Protecting workers from Algorithmic Management: a theoretical framework for four key protection factors}},
  author = {Jian Lee and Jin-Ha Yoon},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.2000600},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.2000600/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Protecting workers from Algorithmic Management: a theoretical framework for four key protection factors
AU  - Jian Lee
AU  - Jin-Ha Yoon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.2000600
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.2000600/full
AB  - Algorithmic Management (AM) is increasingly being linked to adverse occupational health outcomes. Although previous research has focused on the risks generated by AM, the protective factors that mitigate these risks remain theoretically underdeveloped. Drawing on the self-determination theory, social acceleration theory, surveillance capitalism theory, and the human oversight provisions of the EU AI Act, this study identifies and theoretically operationalises four protection factors in AM environments: Decision Autonomy, Pace Control, Feedback Transparency, and Loop Presence. By applying the Layers of Protection Analysis model, we argue that each factor functions as an independent protective barrier against AM-related health risks. Together, they form an integrated framework with direct implications for worker health measurements, algorithmic system designs, and occupational health policies. A conceptual six-step procedure for translating the framework into workplace assessment is also outlined.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -