Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Comparing nutrition indicators in adult population monitoring systems in Italy, Estonia and Belgium

Abstract

Background: Population-based monitoring systems are essential for tracking nutrition-related risk factors and informing noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention. However, nutrition indicators across countries remain heterogeneous, limiting comparability and joint surveillance efforts. Within the Joint Action PreventNCD, efforts are underway to improve NCD monitoring methods across European countries. The present analysis compares nutrition indicators from adult population monitoring systems in Italy, Estonia and Belgium.

Methods: We mapped nutrition indicators from four adult population monitoring systems, PASSI (Italy), TKU (Estonia), and the Belgian Food Consumption Survey (FCS) and HIS, and compared indicators by domain coverage, conceptual alignment, measurement depth, and gaps.

Results: All three countries monitor fruit and vegetable consumption, although level of detail varies considerably. PASSI focuses on indicators such as compliance with five-a-day recommendation, whereas TKU has more granularity, including daily, very low, and insufficient intake for both foods. Belgium additionally includes mean intake (g/day) and weekly frequency through the FCS. For salt consumption, PASSI covers awareness, advice, and iodized salt use, TKU captures high intake and lack of reduction, while the FCS quantifies sodium intake by food group. Moreover, PASSI does not include indicators on sugary/salted foods, while Belgian and Estonian systems do and also uniquely capture wholegrain/fiber intake. TKU details nutrition counselling and intentional dietary changes, while such behavioral indicators are more limited in the other systems.

Conclusions: Despite broad thematic overlap, differences in indicator definitions and measurement depth limit cross-country comparability. Developing a shared core set of nutrition indicators and expanding coverage in less detailed systems would strengthen European NCD surveillance and better support evidence-informed prevention policies.

Key messages: • Nutrition domains overlap across Italy, Estonia, and Belgium, but indicator detail and the timing of data collection vary substantially, especially for fruit, vegetables, and salt consumption.

• Leveraging and harmonising nutrition indicators, particularly where systems are less extensive, contribute to enhance NCD evidence-based prevention in Europe.

Related

  1. Predicting insulin resistance in non-diabetics: Comparing obesity indicators using machine learning.
    Zhiyu Guo, Yingfeng Wei, Xuechao Lu +1
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Comparing physical activity policy evaluations across 27 EU member states: Diverse indicators, inconsistent findings
    S. Messing, A. Tcymbal, L. Birkholz +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  3. Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Metabolic Phenotyping and Precision Nutrition: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives
    Liora Colobatiu, Romolica Mihaiu, Alexandra Pusta +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Quality Indicators for Evaluation of Neonatal Basic Care in Nutrition and Feeding: A Scoping Review and Modified Delphi Study
    Pablo Buck Sainz-Rozas, Dimelza Osorio Sánchez, Pablo García Molina +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Latent profiles of nutrition literacy among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and their associations with dietary adherence and nutritional and metabolic indicators: a multicenter cross-sectional study
    Yanjing Chen, Shiyu Zhang, Caihua Ye +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{possenti2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing nutrition indicators in adult population monitoring systems in Italy, Estonia and Belgium}},
  author = {V Possenti and M Lepnurm and R Reile and S Croes and V Gorasso and V Minardi and B Contoli and M Masocco and G Capelli and N Rossi},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1092},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1092},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing nutrition indicators in adult population monitoring systems in Italy, Estonia and Belgium
AU  - V Possenti
AU  - M Lepnurm
AU  - R Reile
AU  - S Croes
AU  - V Gorasso
AU  - V Minardi
AU  - B Contoli
AU  - M Masocco
AU  - G Capelli
AU  - N Rossi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1092
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1092
AB  - Background: Population-based monitoring systems are essential for tracking nutrition-related risk factors and informing noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention. However, nutrition indicators across countries remain heterogeneous, limiting comparability and joint surveillance efforts. Within the Joint Action PreventNCD, efforts are underway to improve NCD monitoring methods across European countries. The present analysis compares nutrition indicators from adult population monitoring systems in Italy, Estonia and Belgium.  Methods: We mapped nutrition indicators from four adult population monitoring systems, PASSI (Italy), TKU (Estonia), and the Belgian Food Consumption Survey (FCS) and HIS, and compared indicators by domain coverage, conceptual alignment, measurement depth, and gaps.  Results: All three countries monitor fruit and vegetable consumption, although level of detail varies considerably. PASSI focuses on indicators such as compliance with five-a-day recommendation, whereas TKU has more granularity, including daily, very low, and insufficient intake for both foods. Belgium additionally includes mean intake (g/day) and weekly frequency through the FCS. For salt consumption, PASSI covers awareness, advice, and iodized salt use, TKU captures high intake and lack of reduction, while the FCS quantifies sodium intake by food group. Moreover, PASSI does not include indicators on sugary/salted foods, while Belgian and Estonian systems do and also uniquely capture wholegrain/fiber intake. TKU details nutrition counselling and intentional dietary changes, while such behavioral indicators are more limited in the other systems.  Conclusions: Despite broad thematic overlap, differences in indicator definitions and measurement depth limit cross-country comparability. Developing a shared core set of nutrition indicators and expanding coverage in less detailed systems would strengthen European NCD surveillance and better support evidence-informed prevention policies.  Key messages: • Nutrition domains overlap across Italy, Estonia, and Belgium, but indicator detail and the timing of data collection vary substantially, especially for fruit, vegetables, and salt consumption.  • Leveraging and harmonising nutrition indicators, particularly where systems are less extensive, contribute to enhance NCD evidence-based prevention in Europe.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -