Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Virology

Limited adaptive mutations but deterministic genome formula variation in bluetongue virus

1 more authors

Abstract

Arthropod-borne viruses or arboviruses alternate between vertebrates and arthropods, facing distinct selection pressures in each host. Surprisingly, mechanisms facilitating host alternation remain unstudied. Here, we investigate two phenomena potentially facilitating host alternation in bluetongue virus (BTV): adaptive mutations and genome formula variation (GFV; i.e., differences in segment copy numbers). First, we searched for mutations indicative of host adaptation in cattle, sheep, and midges infected during an epizootic. No mutation was fixed in all samples of a given host. Thus, adaptive mutations may not be a major mechanism facilitating host alternation in the studied epizootic. Second, we investigated the relationship between GFV and a proxy of viral fitness, namely, head infection in midges. We analyzed the genome formula (GF) in Culicoides imicola midges, either with or without head infection 10 days after oral inoculation. GFs differed between dissemination groups, suggesting a correlation between GF and head infection. Finally, we investigated the mechanisms underlying GF generation. Currently, two scenarios have been proposed: random generation followed by selection or directed generation through molecular mechanisms. To limit the influence of selection, we analyzed the GF after a single replication cycle in cell culture. GFs converged toward specific values across replicates. Moreover, GFs differed between arthropod and vertebrate cells. Thus, GF generation does not seem purely stochastic and is probably influenced by host-specific mechanisms. Overall, our findings highlight GFV as a mechanism potentially facilitating host alternation of BTV, and they do not strongly support an involvement of mutations in the same phenomenon. IMPORTANCE Arthropod-borne viruses are major public health concerns worldwide. These viruses follow a complex cycle involving an alternation between arthropods and vertebrates. Surprisingly, little is known about the mechanisms that could facilitate this alternation. Understanding such mechanisms could aid the development of antiviral strategies. Here, using bluetongue virus as a model, we investigated two potential mechanisms facilitating alternation. These mechanisms are adaptive mutations and genome formula variation (GFV). We found limited evidence for host-specific parallel mutations in natural populations from a single epizootic. In contrast, we observed a potential link between GFV and viral fitness. Moreover, our results suggest that molecular mechanisms generate host-specific genome formulas from the first round of cell infection.

Related

  1. The Joint Impact of Deleterious Mutations, Dominance, and Gene Flow on Linked Neutral Variation in Structured Populations
    P. Lesturgie, A. Blanckaert, V. C. Sousa
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  2. Age-specific genomic and transcriptomic variation reveals limited evidence for cis-regulatory interactions modulating aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Kaitlin M McHugh, Felipe S Barreto, Molly K Burke
    G3: Genes, Genomes, GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyCrossref
  3. Trait variation driven by tree size more than environment and shows limited translation to species vital rates
    Hannah J Carle, Timothée Bonnett, Adrienne B Nicotra +4
    Functional EcologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPlant biologyHAL
  4. BCOR mutations establish a persistent culture-adaptive state in human induced pluripotent stem cells
    C. Badja, S. Boushaki, Y. Kumar +17
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textCell biologybioRxiv
  5. Independent Major-Effect Loci and Limited Trait Associations Characterize Warning Colour Variation Across Sexes and Life Stages in the Wood Tiger Moth (Arctia plantaginis).
    Eva L Koch, Melanie N Brien, Yingguang Frank Chan +9
    Molecular ecologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{moreau2026limited,
  title = {{Limited adaptive mutations but deterministic genome formula variation in bluetongue virus}},
  author = {Yannis Moreau and Patricia Gil and Antoni Exbrayat and Ignace Rakotoarivony and Emmanuel Bréard and Corinne Sailleau and Cyril Viarouge and Stephan Zientara and Giovanni Savini and Maria Goffredo and Giuseppe Mancini and Etienne Loire and Serafin Gutierrez},
  journal = {Journal of Virology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1128/jvi.00983-26},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05804140v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Limited adaptive mutations but deterministic genome formula variation in bluetongue virus
AU  - Yannis Moreau
AU  - Patricia Gil
AU  - Antoni Exbrayat
AU  - Ignace Rakotoarivony
AU  - Emmanuel Bréard
AU  - Corinne Sailleau
AU  - Cyril Viarouge
AU  - Stephan Zientara
AU  - Giovanni Savini
AU  - Maria Goffredo
AU  - Giuseppe Mancini
AU  - Etienne Loire
AU  - Serafin Gutierrez
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
JO  - Journal of Virology
DO  - 10.1128/jvi.00983-26
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05804140v1
AB  - Arthropod-borne viruses or arboviruses alternate between vertebrates and arthropods, facing distinct selection pressures in each host. Surprisingly, mechanisms facilitating host alternation remain unstudied. Here, we investigate two phenomena potentially facilitating host alternation in bluetongue virus (BTV): adaptive mutations and genome formula variation (GFV; i.e., differences in segment copy numbers). First, we searched for mutations indicative of host adaptation in cattle, sheep, and midges infected during an epizootic. No mutation was fixed in all samples of a given host. Thus, adaptive mutations may not be a major mechanism facilitating host alternation in the studied epizootic. Second, we investigated the relationship between GFV and a proxy of viral fitness, namely, head infection in midges. We analyzed the genome formula (GF) in Culicoides imicola midges, either with or without head infection 10 days after oral inoculation. GFs differed between dissemination groups, suggesting a correlation between GF and head infection. Finally, we investigated the mechanisms underlying GF generation. Currently, two scenarios have been proposed: random generation followed by selection or directed generation through molecular mechanisms. To limit the influence of selection, we analyzed the GF after a single replication cycle in cell culture. GFs converged toward specific values across replicates. Moreover, GFs differed between arthropod and vertebrate cells. Thus, GF generation does not seem purely stochastic and is probably influenced by host-specific mechanisms. Overall, our findings highlight GFV as a mechanism potentially facilitating host alternation of BTV, and they do not strongly support an involvement of mutations in the same phenomenon. IMPORTANCE Arthropod-borne viruses are major public health concerns worldwide. These viruses follow a complex cycle involving an alternation between arthropods and vertebrates. Surprisingly, little is known about the mechanisms that could facilitate this alternation. Understanding such mechanisms could aid the development of antiviral strategies. Here, using bluetongue virus as a model, we investigated two potential mechanisms facilitating alternation. These mechanisms are adaptive mutations and genome formula variation (GFV). We found limited evidence for host-specific parallel mutations in natural populations from a single epizootic. In contrast, we observed a potential link between GFV and viral fitness. Moreover, our results suggest that molecular mechanisms generate host-specific genome formulas from the first round of cell infection.
SN  - 0022-538X
SN  - 1098-5514
ER  -