Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,469 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Igdir University, Igdir 76000, Turkey.
  2. 2Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.
  3. 3Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Bitlis Eren University, Bitlis 13000, Turkey.
  4. 4Department of Health Information Management and Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.
  5. 5Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Topkapi University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey.
  6. 6Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Igdir University, Igdir 76000, Turkey.
  7. 7Department of Electronics and Information Technologies, Faculty of Architecture and Engineering, Nakhchivan State University, Nakhchivan AZ 7012, Azerbaijan.
  8. 8Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Fenerbahce University, Istanbul 34758, Turkey.

Abstract

Background: Panoramic dental radiographs frequently contain multiple coexisting pathological, anatomical, and treatment-related findings that vary in scale, contrast, and boundary definition. Although recent one-stage detectors provide strong performance, reliable localization of small or weakly defined findings remains challenging. Methods: We propose SBRF-Det, a one-stage multi-finding detector integrating scale-dependent representative allocation with boundary-conditioned local-global feature fusion at P4/16. The method was evaluated on OralXrays-9, comprising 12,688 panoramic radiographs and 84,099 retained annotations across nine categories, using a fixed 2688-image hold-out cohort. Twenty-two detector configurations were compared under a common protocol, and A0-A2 were further assessed using three independent seeds and paired radiograph-level bootstrap analysis. Results: SBRF-Det achieved 0.8777 precision, 0.8979 recall, 0.9152 mAP50, and 0.7029 mAP50-95. Relative to the matched YOLO12l baseline, mAP50-95 increased by 0.95 percentage points. Performance remained class dependent, with apical periodontitis reaching 0.4526 mAP50-95 versus 0.8401-0.8842 for implants, porcelain crowns, and ceramic bridges. SBRF-Det used 93.06 GFLOPs versus 95.99 for A0, but inference latency increased from 5.946 to 8.851 ms/image. Three-seed experiments preserved the A0-A1-A2 ordering, while paired bootstrap intervals for A2-A0 and A2-A1 excluded zero. Conclusions: SBRF-Det improves strict localization through representative and boundary-aware feature modeling, but the gain is modest and introduces a runtime trade-off. Patient-linked, multi-center, and reader-centered validation remains necessary before clinical deployment.

Related

  1. Deep Learning for Root Canal Filling Quality on Panoramic Radiographs with Detection and Grading Measured Separately
    Faruk Oztekin, Oguzhan Katar, Mehmet Eskibaglar +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. RCTE: A multi-class object detection framework for dental panoramic radiographs
    Jiayi Peng, Ji Liu, Yufeng Shen +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPLOS
  3. Evaluation of the Position of Impacted Maxillary Canines on Panoramic Radiographs Using Deep Learning with CBCT as the Reference Standard
    Anıl Demirel, Sabahattin Bor, Fırat Oğuz +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. AI-Based Automated Segmentation of the Mandibular Cortex and Mental Foramen for Radiomorphometric Measurement on Panoramic Radiographs: A Feasibility Study
    Sinem Atay Görür, Merve Önder, Özer Çelik +4
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Deep learning-based prediction of maxillary canine impaction on panoramic radiographs using YOLO-OBB derived DenSE-Net
    J. K. Adithya Annamalai, L. Rama Parvathy
    BMC Oral HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{karatas2026sbrfdet,
  title = {{SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs.}},
  author = {Furkan Karatas and Omer Aslan and Mehmet Burukanli and Shahid Mohammad Ganie and Merve Ersoy and Faruk Ozger and Ishak Pacal},
  journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193259},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882414},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - SBRF-Det: Scale-Boundary Representative Fusion for Multi-Finding Detection in Panoramic Dental Radiographs.
AU  - Furkan Karatas
AU  - Omer Aslan
AU  - Mehmet Burukanli
AU  - Shahid Mohammad Ganie
AU  - Merve Ersoy
AU  - Faruk Ozger
AU  - Ishak Pacal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/diagnostics16193259
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882414
AB  - Background: Panoramic dental radiographs frequently contain multiple coexisting pathological, anatomical, and treatment-related findings that vary in scale, contrast, and boundary definition. Although recent one-stage detectors provide strong performance, reliable localization of small or weakly defined findings remains challenging. Methods: We propose SBRF-Det, a one-stage multi-finding detector integrating scale-dependent representative allocation with boundary-conditioned local-global feature fusion at P4/16. The method was evaluated on OralXrays-9, comprising 12,688 panoramic radiographs and 84,099 retained annotations across nine categories, using a fixed 2688-image hold-out cohort. Twenty-two detector configurations were compared under a common protocol, and A0-A2 were further assessed using three independent seeds and paired radiograph-level bootstrap analysis. Results: SBRF-Det achieved 0.8777 precision, 0.8979 recall, 0.9152 mAP50, and 0.7029 mAP50-95. Relative to the matched YOLO12l baseline, mAP50-95 increased by 0.95 percentage points. Performance remained class dependent, with apical periodontitis reaching 0.4526 mAP50-95 versus 0.8401-0.8842 for implants, porcelain crowns, and ceramic bridges. SBRF-Det used 93.06 GFLOPs versus 95.99 for A0, but inference latency increased from 5.946 to 8.851 ms/image. Three-seed experiments preserved the A0-A1-A2 ordering, while paired bootstrap intervals for A2-A0 and A2-A1 excluded zero. Conclusions: SBRF-Det improves strict localization through representative and boundary-aware feature modeling, but the gain is modest and introduces a runtime trade-off. Patient-linked, multi-center, and reader-centered validation remains necessary before clinical deployment.
SN  - 2075-4418
ER  -