User-centered design and related participatory approaches in digital health innovations for low-resource settings: A scoping review protocol
4 affiliations
- 1Health Systems Strengthening Hub, Institute of Healthcare Management, Strathmore Business School, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya
- 2Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease Unit, Health and Wellbeing Theme, African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Nairobi, Kenya
- 3Department of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 4Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Global Health Program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize the existing evidence on the applications, reported outcomes, and key methodological considerations of user-centered design (UCD) and related participatory design methodologies including human centered design (HCD), co-design, participatory design and co-creation of digital health innovations within resource constrained settings. Introduction: A critical challenge in global health is the high failure rate of technologically sound innovations. This is due in part to insufficient consideration of the end-user’s environment, literacy levels, and socio-cultural beliefs. UCD is an iterative design process that grounds development in an understanding of the user’s needs, contexts, and feedback. It sits within a wider family of related approaches such as HCD, co-design, participatory designs and co-creation, while related to UCD, is distinguished by its emphasis on equitable partnership, where end-users are not merely informants but co-designers and co-developers of the innovation. These approaches have emerged as promising methodologies to develop more relevant, acceptable, and sustainable digital health solutions. In disease diagnostics, despite increasing interest, there is lack of a consolidated review mapping the full scope of how these methodologies are applied, across which types of digital health and diagnostic innovations, and with what outcomes. Inclusion criteria: Studies conducted in low-resource settings, published between 2015 and 2026 that apply UCD or a related participatory design methodology to the development, adaptation or evaluation of a digital health innovation and, where reported, outcomes such as usability, patient satisfaction, innovation success, adoption, scalability and sustainability. Studies that name such an approach without describing the activities undertaken are also eligible, and the completeness of reporting will be recorded and reported as a finding of this review. Methods: Guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, we will search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, the ACM Digital Library, the WHO Global Index Medicus, and Google Scholar, together with named grey literature sources, for peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and grey literature published in English and French from 2015 to 2026. Data extraction will include information on study characteristics, the design approaches and processes applied, the completeness with which they are reported as well as the outcomes.
Related
- Increasing school attendance and retention in refugee settings: Participatory development of the SchoolLinks intervention
- Delayed Diagnosis of a Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1-Like Demyelinating Neuropathy in Somalia: A Case Report and Review of Clinical Indicators in Resource-Limited Settings.
- Navigating HPV vaccination challenges in low-resource settings: Practical strategies for estimating the size of out-of-school girls
- Optimisation of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning
- Development of approaches to documenting information on plant genetic resource accessions as a basis for their guaranteed conservation and effective use
BibTeX
@article{otukpa2026usercentered,
title = {{User-centered design and related participatory approaches in digital health innovations for low-resource settings: A scoping review protocol}},
author = {Emmanuel Otukpa and Abdhalla Ziraba and Christopher Pell and Ben Ngoye},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0337671},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337671},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - User-centered design and related participatory approaches in digital health innovations for low-resource settings: A scoping review protocol
AU - Emmanuel Otukpa
AU - Abdhalla Ziraba
AU - Christopher Pell
AU - Ben Ngoye
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/08
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0337671
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337671
AB - Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize the existing evidence on the applications, reported outcomes, and key methodological considerations of user-centered design (UCD) and related participatory design methodologies including human centered design (HCD), co-design, participatory design and co-creation of digital health innovations within resource constrained settings. Introduction: A critical challenge in global health is the high failure rate of technologically sound innovations. This is due in part to insufficient consideration of the end-user’s environment, literacy levels, and socio-cultural beliefs. UCD is an iterative design process that grounds development in an understanding of the user’s needs, contexts, and feedback. It sits within a wider family of related approaches such as HCD, co-design, participatory designs and co-creation, while related to UCD, is distinguished by its emphasis on equitable partnership, where end-users are not merely informants but co-designers and co-developers of the innovation. These approaches have emerged as promising methodologies to develop more relevant, acceptable, and sustainable digital health solutions. In disease diagnostics, despite increasing interest, there is lack of a consolidated review mapping the full scope of how these methodologies are applied, across which types of digital health and diagnostic innovations, and with what outcomes. Inclusion criteria: Studies conducted in low-resource settings, published between 2015 and 2026 that apply UCD or a related participatory design methodology to the development, adaptation or evaluation of a digital health innovation and, where reported, outcomes such as usability, patient satisfaction, innovation success, adoption, scalability and sustainability. Studies that name such an approach without describing the activities undertaken are also eligible, and the completeness of reporting will be recorded and reported as a finding of this review. Methods: Guided by the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR, we will search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, the ACM Digital Library, the WHO Global Index Medicus, and Google Scholar, together with named grey literature sources, for peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and grey literature published in English and French from 2015 to 2026. Data extraction will include information on study characteristics, the design approaches and processes applied, the completeness with which they are reported as well as the outcomes.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -