Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,033 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Role of Device Size on Island Divertor Performance of W7-X-like Configurations

Abstract

To examine how the island divertor performs in future low-shear stellarator reactors, we simulate (using EMC3-Eirene [1]) 3 different scales of W7-X: its current size, increased by a factor 2, and increased by a factor 4, where 4 times W7-X corresponds roughly to a reactor-scale device. For a single magnetic configuration, the standard magnetic configuration in W7-X, we examine how increasing the size of W7-X alters the divertor performance of the island divertor. We analyze how device scale shifts the location of the ionization source and the downstream density and temperature trends in the island divertor for achieving detachment. Local field line analysis shows that factor 2 and factor 4 size scalings achieve target densities >1021 m−3 via plasma ``self-baffling" within the open island divertor geometry. Finally, the heat and particle flux deposition on the scaled-up island divertor configurations are calculated. We observe a separation in the target heat and particle flux distribution with increased machine size in agreement with [2]. The target heat fluxes are <5 MW/m2 at high separatrix densities. This shows that the separation of the heat and particle flux channels remains to be largely unproblematic. This analysis helps guide how to improve the open island divertor geometries for future stellarator reactors.

Related

  1. Evaluate the thermal performance of green roofs as an urban heat island mitigation strategy under arid climate conditions in Bahrain
    Ashraf Mohamed Soliman, Alexandre Lefevre, Garry Riviere +1
    Smart and Sustainable Built EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceGeneral physicsHAL
  2. Design, Modeling, and Characterization of High-Performance 1550-nm InGaAsP/InP Spot-Size Converter Integrated Waveguide Photodiode
    Dharmander Malik, Utpal Das
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  3. Device Engineering and Performance Optimization of Cu2NiGeS4 Thin-Film Solar Cells with In2S3/MoTe2 Charge-Selective Layers: A Computational Study
    Md Tashfiq Bin Kashem, Hasib Md Abid Bin Farid
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Design and conceptual modeling of a tokamak-like X-point divertor for the Helios quasi-axisymmetric stellarator
    E.R. Flom, W.B. Kalb, Shreyas Seethalla +9
    Fusion Engineering and DesignPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsOpenAlex
  5. Detachment dynamics and disturbance rejection in the TCV X-Point Target divertor
    M. Winkel, K. Verhaegh, B. Kool +13
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPlasma physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{garcia2026role,
  title = {{Role of Device Size on Island Divertor Performance of W7-X-like Configurations}},
  author = {K. A. Garcia and F. Reimold and Y. Feng and H. Frerichs and V. R. Winters and the W7-X team},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23107},
  eprint = {2610.23107},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23107},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Role of Device Size on Island Divertor Performance of W7-X-like Configurations
AU  - K. A. Garcia
AU  - F. Reimold
AU  - Y. Feng
AU  - H. Frerichs
AU  - V. R. Winters
AU  - the W7-X team
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23107
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23107
AB  - To examine how the island divertor performs in future low-shear stellarator reactors, we simulate (using EMC3-Eirene [1]) 3 different scales of W7-X: its current size, increased by a factor 2, and increased by a factor 4, where 4 times W7-X corresponds roughly to a reactor-scale device. For a single magnetic configuration, the standard magnetic configuration in W7-X, we examine how increasing the size of W7-X alters the divertor performance of the island divertor. We analyze how device scale shifts the location of the ionization source and the downstream density and temperature trends in the island divertor for achieving detachment. Local field line analysis shows that factor 2 and factor 4 size scalings achieve target densities >10^21 m^−3 via plasma ``self-baffling" within the open island divertor geometry. Finally, the heat and particle flux deposition on the scaled-up island divertor configurations are calculated. We observe a separation in the target heat and particle flux distribution with increased machine size in agreement with [2]. The target heat fluxes are <5 MW/m^2 at high separatrix densities. This shows that the separation of the heat and particle flux channels remains to be largely unproblematic. This analysis helps guide how to improve the open island divertor geometries for future stellarator reactors.
ER  -