Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Distributional Flexibility under Box-Cox Normality: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of the Power-Normal Distribution

Abstract

Methods based on Box-Cox models have recently been developed for inference on clinically interpretable treatment effects in clinical trials. These methods model marginal outcome distributions using the power-normal distribution (PND), but the range of real-world data distributions that it can adequately approximate remains unclear. We evaluated PND approximations using two parameterizations of the four-parameter generalized F/generalized beta of the second kind family and 165 laboratory variables from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Overall distributional agreement was assessed using the overlap coefficient and Jensen-Shannon divergence, and location and spread on the original scale were evaluated using relative biases in the median and interquartile range. The PND closely approximated a broad range of smooth unimodal positive distributions in both the theoretical and empirical evaluations. Reduced agreement was associated with pronounced lower-bound accumulation, heaping or discretization, and multicomponent or peak-tail features. These features may be recognizable before fitting and provide practical guidance for assessing the suitability of the PND. We also developed the R package powerNormal for distributional calculations, parameter estimation, reparameterization, and random-number generation for the PND.

Related

  1. Reconciling Interpretability with Covariate-Dependent Shape Flexibility in Penalized Transformation Models for Distributional Regression
    Johannes Brachem, Thomas Kneib
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Closed-form evaluation of the cumulative distribution function and absolute moments of the variance-gamma distribution
    Robert E. Gaunt, Heather L. Sutcliffe
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
  3. Sibuya probability distribution and numerical evaluation of fractional-order operators
    Nikolai Leonenko, Igor Podlubny
    Fractional Calculus & Applied AnalysisPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral mathematicsPMCEurope PMC
  4. Normality of closures of conormal bundles to Schubert cells for GLn
    Ekaterina Bogdanova, Dyne Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. A solution to Haagerup's problem: Normality of weights is commutatively determined
    David P. Blecher, Ikhan Choi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{maruo2026distributional,
  title = {{Distributional Flexibility under Box-Cox Normality: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of the Power-Normal Distribution}},
  author = {Kazushi Maruo and Yusuke Yamaguchi and Ryota Ishii and Toshio Shimokawwa and Masahiko Gosho},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.38454},
  eprint = {2610.38454},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38454},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distributional Flexibility under Box-Cox Normality: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of the Power-Normal Distribution
AU  - Kazushi Maruo
AU  - Yusuke Yamaguchi
AU  - Ryota Ishii
AU  - Toshio Shimokawwa
AU  - Masahiko Gosho
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.38454
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38454
AB  - Methods based on Box-Cox models have recently been developed for inference on clinically interpretable treatment effects in clinical trials. These methods model marginal outcome distributions using the power-normal distribution (PND), but the range of real-world data distributions that it can adequately approximate remains unclear. We evaluated PND approximations using two parameterizations of the four-parameter generalized F/generalized beta of the second kind family and 165 laboratory variables from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Overall distributional agreement was assessed using the overlap coefficient and Jensen-Shannon divergence, and location and spread on the original scale were evaluated using relative biases in the median and interquartile range. The PND closely approximated a broad range of smooth unimodal positive distributions in both the theoretical and empirical evaluations. Reduced agreement was associated with pronounced lower-bound accumulation, heaping or discretization, and multicomponent or peak-tail features. These features may be recognizable before fitting and provide practical guidance for assessing the suitability of the PND. We also developed the R package powerNormal for distributional calculations, parameter estimation, reparameterization, and random-number generation for the PND.
ER  -