Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

SMALL AND SICK NEWBORN CARE: LEARNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION ACROSS AFRICA AND BEYOND: Supplement 2

20 more authors
  1. 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Abstract

Background: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) reduces neonatal mortality and morbidity among preterm and low birthweight (LBW) infants, but implementation and quality vary across sub-Saharan African (SSA) hospitals. This study reports KMC coverage and quality of care for preterm and LBW neonates admitted to hospitals in the NEST360 Alliance (Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Nigeria) and examines the association between KMC provision and survival to discharge. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using routinely collected neonatal inpatient data from hospitals participating in the NEST360 Alliance. Newborns weighing under 2500g were eligible for KMC and included in coverage and quality analyses (January 2021-December 2024). Quality-of-care cascades quantified attrition along the KMC care pathway from eligibility to successful delivery, defining quality as the proportion of eligible neonates reaching each successive step. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the association between KMC and survival at discharge, including variation by illness severity and, among KMC recipients, by timing of initiation across severity and birthweight strata. Results: Of 375,238 neonatal admissions across 66 hospitals, 125,844 neonates were eligible for KMC and had KMC documentation available. Among these, 64,619 (51.3%) received KMC. All four countries showed improved coverage over the study period, with the largest absolute increases in Nigeria (27.6%) and Tanzania (27.4%). Excluding Kenya, where KMC timing data were unavailable, 92.1% of neonates started on KMC had a documented start date; of these 44,264 neonates, 12,934 (29.2%) were initiated on KMC on the first day of life. The quality cascade showed eligible neonates were lost at each step, from eligibility through to documented, timely, and sustained KMC. Among neonates eligible for both KMC and CPAP, 39.4% of those started on KMC also received documented CPAP at some point during admission. After adjustment for patient-level factors, receiving KMC was associated with improved survival across all severity groups, with the greatest absolute benefit among the most critically ill neonates (adjusted predicted survival 7% vs 80% without and with KMC, respectively). Conclusion: KMC coverage improved substantially across NEST360-implementing hospitals between 2021 and 2024, demonstrating progress in implementation. However, important gaps remain in the quality and timeliness of KMC delivery. More investment in high-quality KMC implementation, supported by robust monitoring systems linked with quality improvement, are essential to improve outcomes for small and sick newborns across sub-Saharan Africa.

Related

  1. Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Humanitarian and Crisis Settings in Sub‐Saharan Africa: An Umbrella Review
    Endale Tamiru Burayu, Zelalem Banjaw Zegeye, Gemechu Gelan Bekele
    Health Science ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  2. Medical Students’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Behaviors Regarding Food, Dietary Supplement, and Drug Interactions Across Academic Years
    Fatih Berktaş, Ali Akçay, Merve Nur Toprak +3
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. Evidence gaps hindering implementation of newborn screening for galactosemia
    L Paz-Valinas, MJ Faraldo-Vallés, MC Maceira-Rozas +1
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
  4. Consented Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Using Dried Blood Spot and Dried Saliva Spot Specimens: Implementation and Relative Programmatic Accuracy.
    Emeril Santander, Emily Reuvers, Melanie Lacaria +13
    International journal of neonatal screeningPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Smart Paper Technology for maternal and newborn health data in The Gambia: A qualitative study of early implementation
    Oluwatosin Nkereuwem, Jana Prauseová, Rachel Ford +8
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{reynolds2026small,
  title = {{SMALL AND SICK NEWBORN CARE: LEARNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION ACROSS AFRICA AND BEYOND: Supplement 2}},
  author = {E. Reynolds and J. Thomas and E. W. Gicheha and K. Shemwell and K. Dougherty and C. C. Magombo and D. Mochache and J. C. Mutakyamilwa and G. T. Soko and A. A. Idowu and D. Muinde and M. Waiyego and O. Tongo and N. Salim and J. Shabani and V. C. Ezeaka and W. Macharia and M. Chiume and K. Kawaza and S. K. Ngwala and G. Okello and O. Odedere and C. Paul and L. Malla and J. Wainaina and Z. M. Oden and R. Richards-Kortum and L. R. Hirschhorn and J. E. Lawn and N. R. Rhoda and S. Murless-Collins and C. A. Bohne},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.05.26367332},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367332v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - SMALL AND SICK NEWBORN CARE: LEARNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION ACROSS AFRICA AND BEYOND: Supplement 2
AU  - E. Reynolds
AU  - J. Thomas
AU  - E. W. Gicheha
AU  - K. Shemwell
AU  - K. Dougherty
AU  - C. C. Magombo
AU  - D. Mochache
AU  - J. C. Mutakyamilwa
AU  - G. T. Soko
AU  - A. A. Idowu
AU  - D. Muinde
AU  - M. Waiyego
AU  - O. Tongo
AU  - N. Salim
AU  - J. Shabani
AU  - V. C. Ezeaka
AU  - W. Macharia
AU  - M. Chiume
AU  - K. Kawaza
AU  - S. K. Ngwala
AU  - G. Okello
AU  - O. Odedere
AU  - C. Paul
AU  - L. Malla
AU  - J. Wainaina
AU  - Z. M. Oden
AU  - R. Richards-Kortum
AU  - L. R. Hirschhorn
AU  - J. E. Lawn
AU  - N. R. Rhoda
AU  - S. Murless-Collins
AU  - C. A. Bohne
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.05.26367332
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367332v1
AB  - Background: Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) reduces neonatal mortality and morbidity among preterm and low birthweight (LBW) infants, but implementation and quality vary across sub-Saharan African (SSA) hospitals. This study reports KMC coverage and quality of care for preterm and LBW neonates admitted to hospitals in the NEST360 Alliance (Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Nigeria) and examines the association between KMC provision and survival to discharge. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using routinely collected neonatal inpatient data from hospitals participating in the NEST360 Alliance. Newborns weighing under 2500g were eligible for KMC and included in coverage and quality analyses (January 2021-December 2024). Quality-of-care cascades quantified attrition along the KMC care pathway from eligibility to successful delivery, defining quality as the proportion of eligible neonates reaching each successive step. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed the association between KMC and survival at discharge, including variation by illness severity and, among KMC recipients, by timing of initiation across severity and birthweight strata. Results: Of 375,238 neonatal admissions across 66 hospitals, 125,844 neonates were eligible for KMC and had KMC documentation available. Among these, 64,619 (51.3%) received KMC. All four countries showed improved coverage over the study period, with the largest absolute increases in Nigeria (27.6%) and Tanzania (27.4%). Excluding Kenya, where KMC timing data were unavailable, 92.1% of neonates started on KMC had a documented start date; of these 44,264 neonates, 12,934 (29.2%) were initiated on KMC on the first day of life. The quality cascade showed eligible neonates were lost at each step, from eligibility through to documented, timely, and sustained KMC. Among neonates eligible for both KMC and CPAP, 39.4% of those started on KMC also received documented CPAP at some point during admission. After adjustment for patient-level factors, receiving KMC was associated with improved survival across all severity groups, with the greatest absolute benefit among the most critically ill neonates (adjusted predicted survival 7% vs 80% without and with KMC, respectively). Conclusion: KMC coverage improved substantially across NEST360-implementing hospitals between 2021 and 2024, demonstrating progress in implementation. However, important gaps remain in the quality and timeliness of KMC delivery. More investment in high-quality KMC implementation, supported by robust monitoring systems linked with quality improvement, are essential to improve outcomes for small and sick newborns across sub-Saharan Africa.
ER  -