Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Psychology

The cost of mentalizing: executive contributions to social cognition performance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

4 affiliations
  1. 1IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy
  2. 2Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Brain e-Health Aging (BeA) Laboratory, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Milan, Italy
  3. 3Third Neurology Unit and Motor Neuron Disease Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
  4. 4Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy

Abstract

Background: Mentalizing deficits are common in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Performance at high-level socio-cognitive tasks may be particularly vulnerable to integrity of basic cognitive processes. However, the extent to which non-social functioning contributes to socio-cognitive impairment in ALS remains poorly understood. In this study, we addressed this question in a large cohort of patients.

Methods: We assessed 257 ALS patients and 120 healthy controls using the Story-based Empathy Task (SET), which dissociates intention attribution (IA), emotion attribution (EA), and basic causal inference (CI). Vectorial analyses were applied to quantify overall performance and imbalance between social and non-social components. Mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the contribution of executive system integrity to social cognition performance in ALS.

Results: Patients showed significantly reduced performance across all SET conditions compared to controls, with imbalance between mentalizing and basic causal inference. Distinct profiles emerged across ALS phenotypes. ALS patients with behavioral changes exhibited predominant deficits in emotion attribution, whereas cognitively unimpaired ALS showed selective impairment in intention attribution. Executive functioning was significantly associated with SET performances and mediated the relationship between basic inference and both intention and emotion attribution.

Discussion: Mentalizing impairment in ALS reflects an interaction between executive processes and specialized socio-cognitive systems. The identification of dissociable profiles supports a dual-route, network-based model of ALS, involving socio-affective and inferential pathways, and underscores the importance of integrated cognitive assessment and more targeted interventions addressing both social and non-social cognitive domains.

Related

  1. Multicomponent training versus elastic-band training for improving global cognition and executive function in older women: a randomized controlled trial
    Edgar Vásquez-Carrasco, Pablo Aravena-Sagardia, Mauricio Barramuño-Medina +7
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Performance and response time in emotion recognition and mentalizing measures in patients with schizophrenia.
    Alicia Ruiz-Toca, Alba Hernández-Gómez, Nelson Andrade-González +5
    BMC psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMC
  3. Controlled deep breathing technique intervention effects on resting EEG, subjective psychological distress, and executive function performance in young adults
    Ohav Ivgi, Oded Meiron
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Effects of physical activity on executive function components and academic performance in children aged 6–12 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pingxue Qiu, Ting Zhou, Jiachen Wu +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  5. An empirical study on the impact of executive compensation incentives on the performance of Chinese pharmaceutical firms
    Huihui Zhang, Boyi Xu, Su Wang +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{cerami2026cost,
  title = {{The cost of mentalizing: executive contributions to social cognition performance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis}},
  author = {Chiara Cerami and Andrea Panzavolta and Veronica Faltracco and Eleonora Dalla Bella and Nilo Riva and Alessandra Telesca and Federica Ferrara and Alessandra Dodich and Christian Lunetta and Monica Consonni},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1960658},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1960658},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The cost of mentalizing: executive contributions to social cognition performance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
AU  - Chiara Cerami
AU  - Andrea Panzavolta
AU  - Veronica Faltracco
AU  - Eleonora Dalla Bella
AU  - Nilo Riva
AU  - Alessandra Telesca
AU  - Federica Ferrara
AU  - Alessandra Dodich
AU  - Christian Lunetta
AU  - Monica Consonni
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Frontiers in Psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1960658
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1960658
AB  - Background: Mentalizing deficits are common in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Performance at high-level socio-cognitive tasks may be particularly vulnerable to integrity of basic cognitive processes. However, the extent to which non-social functioning contributes to socio-cognitive impairment in ALS remains poorly understood. In this study, we addressed this question in a large cohort of patients.  Methods: We assessed 257 ALS patients and 120 healthy controls using the Story-based Empathy Task (SET), which dissociates intention attribution (IA), emotion attribution (EA), and basic causal inference (CI). Vectorial analyses were applied to quantify overall performance and imbalance between social and non-social components. Mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the contribution of executive system integrity to social cognition performance in ALS.  Results: Patients showed significantly reduced performance across all SET conditions compared to controls, with imbalance between mentalizing and basic causal inference. Distinct profiles emerged across ALS phenotypes. ALS patients with behavioral changes exhibited predominant deficits in emotion attribution, whereas cognitively unimpaired ALS showed selective impairment in intention attribution. Executive functioning was significantly associated with SET performances and mediated the relationship between basic inference and both intention and emotion attribution.  Discussion: Mentalizing impairment in ALS reflects an interaction between executive processes and specialized socio-cognitive systems. The identification of dissociable profiles supports a dual-route, network-based model of ALS, involving socio-affective and inferential pathways, and underscores the importance of integrated cognitive assessment and more targeted interventions addressing both social and non-social cognitive domains.
SN  - 1664-1078
ER  -