Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

No-Harm Physics-Informed Inverse Learning with Residual-Calibrated Uncertainty

Abstract

Physics-informed learning is increasingly used for partial differential equation (PDE)-governed inverse problems, but its reliability remains difficult to certify. This paper develops a no-harm certification-and-selection framework for physics-informed inverse learning. A learned reconstruction is accepted only when its residual-calibrated radius is no worse than the baseline radius, namely when Rlearn≤ Rbase+εsafe;otherwise, the method returns the baseline. The certificate combines data, physics, boundary or initial-condition, and optimization residuals. Under a conditional stability estimate, these residuals yield an a posteriori reconstruction-error bound and a deterministic uncertainty radius. A high-probability certificate is also derived for physics residuals estimated from independent random collocation points. Numerical tests on Poisson source recovery, inverse heat reconstruction, limited-angle tomography, elliptic coefficient identification, and stochastic residual validation show that the selector accepts certified improvements, rejects shifted, hallucinated, or unfinished candidates, and becomes conservative in strongly ill-posed regimes. The framework is therefore a certification-and-selection layer, not another reconstruction architecture.

Related

  1. Distance-Residual Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Differential and Partial Differential Inclusions
    Maria Filipkovska, Juan José Mar\'ın, Isil Oner +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification
    Christian Soize
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification
    Christian Soize
    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and EngineeringPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsGeneral physicsHAL
  4. Comparison of neural and spline representations for physics-informed learning
    Régis Duvigneau
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingHALarXiv
  5. Data-Driven On/Off Topology Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices Based on Graph Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Physics-Guided Reinforcement Learning
    Xiaoyu Liu, Yihan Si, Wei Xiang +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{katende2026noharm,
  title = {{No-Harm Physics-Informed Inverse Learning with Residual-Calibrated Uncertainty}},
  author = {Ronald Katende},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.07153},
  eprint = {2606.07153},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07153},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - No-Harm Physics-Informed Inverse Learning with Residual-Calibrated Uncertainty
AU  - Ronald Katende
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.07153
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07153
AB  - Physics-informed learning is increasingly used for partial differential equation (PDE)-governed inverse problems, but its reliability remains difficult to certify. This paper develops a no-harm certification-and-selection framework for physics-informed inverse learning. A learned reconstruction is accepted only when its residual-calibrated radius is no worse than the baseline radius, namely when R_learn≤ R_base+ε_safe;otherwise, the method returns the baseline. The certificate combines data, physics, boundary or initial-condition, and optimization residuals. Under a conditional stability estimate, these residuals yield an a posteriori reconstruction-error bound and a deterministic uncertainty radius. A high-probability certificate is also derived for physics residuals estimated from independent random collocation points. Numerical tests on Poisson source recovery, inverse heat reconstruction, limited-angle tomography, elliptic coefficient identification, and stochastic residual validation show that the selector accepts certified improvements, rejects shifted, hallucinated, or unfinished candidates, and becomes conservative in strongly ill-posed regimes. The framework is therefore a certification-and-selection layer, not another reconstruction architecture.
ER  -