Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYInternational Journal for Equity in Health

Decomposing health inequality by dimensions and determinants in China using EQ-5D-5L: an integrated framework

  1. 1School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University
  2. 2School of Business and Social Science, University of Southern Denmark
  3. 3School of Nursing, Henan University of Science and Technology

Abstract

Background The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used measure of health status that has been increasingly applied to study health inequalities. Despite growing recognition of health as a multidimensional construct, few decomposition studies have simultaneously considered both health dimension and their determinants as sources of inequality. This study fills this gap by providing the first integrated decomposition of socioeconomic-related health inequality in China using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Methods Using cross-sectional data from a nationally distributed sample of 29,882 Chinese adults, we applied the Erreygers-corrected concentration index (ECI) to measure socioeconomic inequality in EQ-5D-5L utility scores, with household income as the ranking variable. An integrated decomposition framework was developed to jointly quantify the contributions of the five EQ-5D-5L dimensions and their associated determinants to overall health inequality. This framework not only identifies the leading dimensions and determinants but also quantifies how determinants contribute to overall inequality through specific dimensions. Results The estimated ECI for overall EQ-5D-5L utility scores was 0.0275 (95% confidence interval: 0.0227, 0.0326), indicating modest but statistically significant pro-rich inequality in overall health. Pain/discomfort (PD) and mobility (MO) dimensions jointly accounted for more than 60% of overall inequality. Household income and chronic disease history were primary determinants, which contributed through all five dimensions. Sex–age composition contributed positively to overall inequality but showed an offsetting association with inequality in the anxiety/depression (AD) dimension. Negative life events contributed mainly through the AD and PD dimensions, whereas education was associated with reduced overall inequality via the AD dimension. High malnutrition risk contributed to overall inequality primarily through the MO, usual activities (UA), and SC dimensions, while poor sleep quality contributed predominantly through the AD and PD dimensions. These results were robust to using the Wagstaff-corrected concentration index and an alternative decomposition specification. Conclusions The contributions of leading determinants to socioeconomic-related health inequality exhibited substantial heterogeneity across health dimensions. Our findings highlight the importance of moving beyond aggregate measures and suggest that interventions informed by the specific determinants and dimensions contributing most to overall inequality may help support more equitable health outcomes in China and other low- and middle-income countries.

Related

  1. Decomposing the inequality of tobacco use between upper caste and scheduled caste/tribe men in India, 2005-06 to 2019-21
    Astapati Hemram, Pritam Ghosh
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossref
  2. From circumstances to efforts: the shifting determinants of health opportunity inequality in China
    Xing Feng
    Population Health MetricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  3. Trends, patterns, determinants and socio-economic inequality of high-risk fertility behavior (HRFB) among Bangladeshi women: Evidence from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys
    Raisha Binte Islam, Syed Toukir Ahmed Noor
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOS
  4. Implementation strategies, outcomes and determinants of integrated care for cardiometabolic conditions and mental, neurological and substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
    Emma Jeltje Blinker, Gordon Kwasi Ampomah Amoh, Samuel Ankamah +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. 42 Integrated systemic and spatial profiling reveals vascular-immune determinants of response to dual PD-L1 and VEGF blockade in refractory melanoma
    David Liu, Michael Manos, Rizwan Haq +10
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{wu2026decomposing,
  title = {{Decomposing health inequality by dimensions and determinants in China using EQ-5D-5L: an integrated framework}},
  author = {Jingxian Wu and Yaping Deng and Jørgen T. Lauridsen and Cong Li and Yuqi Yang},
  journal = {International Journal for Equity in Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12939-026-02983-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02983-z},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Decomposing health inequality by dimensions and determinants in China using EQ-5D-5L: an integrated framework
AU  - Jingxian Wu
AU  - Yaping Deng
AU  - Jørgen T. Lauridsen
AU  - Cong Li
AU  - Yuqi Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - International Journal for Equity in Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12939-026-02983-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02983-z
AB  - Background The EQ-5D-5L is a widely used measure of health status that has been increasingly applied to study health inequalities. Despite growing recognition of health as a multidimensional construct, few decomposition studies have simultaneously considered both health dimension and their determinants as sources of inequality. This study fills this gap by providing the first integrated decomposition of socioeconomic-related health inequality in China using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Methods Using cross-sectional data from a nationally distributed sample of 29,882 Chinese adults, we applied the Erreygers-corrected concentration index (ECI) to measure socioeconomic inequality in EQ-5D-5L utility scores, with household income as the ranking variable. An integrated decomposition framework was developed to jointly quantify the contributions of the five EQ-5D-5L dimensions and their associated determinants to overall health inequality. This framework not only identifies the leading dimensions and determinants but also quantifies how determinants contribute to overall inequality through specific dimensions. Results The estimated ECI for overall EQ-5D-5L utility scores was 0.0275 (95% confidence interval: 0.0227, 0.0326), indicating modest but statistically significant pro-rich inequality in overall health. Pain/discomfort (PD) and mobility (MO) dimensions jointly accounted for more than 60% of overall inequality. Household income and chronic disease history were primary determinants, which contributed through all five dimensions. Sex–age composition contributed positively to overall inequality but showed an offsetting association with inequality in the anxiety/depression (AD) dimension. Negative life events contributed mainly through the AD and PD dimensions, whereas education was associated with reduced overall inequality via the AD dimension. High malnutrition risk contributed to overall inequality primarily through the MO, usual activities (UA), and SC dimensions, while poor sleep quality contributed predominantly through the AD and PD dimensions. These results were robust to using the Wagstaff-corrected concentration index and an alternative decomposition specification. Conclusions The contributions of leading determinants to socioeconomic-related health inequality exhibited substantial heterogeneity across health dimensions. Our findings highlight the importance of moving beyond aggregate measures and suggest that interventions informed by the specific determinants and dimensions contributing most to overall inequality may help support more equitable health outcomes in China and other low- and middle-income countries.
SN  - 1475-9276
ER  -