Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Nutrition

The effect of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  1. 1Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2Students’ Scientific Research Center (SSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3Health and Environment Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Background and aims: While the cholesterol-lowering properties of phytosterols are well established, their effects on cardiovascular health, particularly endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation, remain insufficiently explored. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function in adults using key vascular biomarkers.

Methods and results: A systematic search of major databases up to March 2026 identified randomized controlled trials comparing phytosterol supplementation with placebo or control. Eligible studies assessed endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) or markers of endothelial activation, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). Random-effects models were applied to pool effect sizes, and subgroup and dose-response analyses were performed. Ten randomized controlled studies (14 effect sizes; 1,278 participants) were included, comprising six studies contributing eight effect sizes for FMD (n = 802) and four studies contributing six effect sizes for VCAM-1 (n = 476). Phytosterol supplementation showed no significant effect on FMD (mean difference: -0.05%, 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.51; P = 0.857) or VCAM-1 (standardized mean difference: -0.16, 95% CI: − 0.34 to 0.03; P = 0.098). Dose-response and meta-regression analyses indicated no significant association of either dose or treatment duration with endothelial outcomes (all P > 0.3).

Conclusion: Based on current evidence, no statistically significant effect of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function was observed. Further long-term, well-designed randomized trials, particularly in high-risk populations, are required to better elucidate potential vascular effects.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9.

Related

  1. Effects of Bioactive Compound Supplementation on Insulin Resistance and Systemic Inflammation in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sarah Nichele, Lucas Moneró Prates, Luca Busetto
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  2. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the liver function in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mahdi Vajdi, Negin Nikrad, Mahsa Khajeh +5
    Diabetology & Metabolic SyndromePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismDOAJ
  3. Effects of Oral Vitamin D Supplementation on Physical Performance in Combat-Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Marinos Michael, Christoforos D. Giannaki, Pinelopi S. Stavrinou +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  4. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic syndrome parameters in adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials exploring the role of baseline vitamin D status and supplementation dose
    Hind Alzarooni, Falak Zeb, Falak Zeb +1
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionDOAJ
  5. Effects of selenium supplementation on glycemic indices and oxidative-stress biomarkers in adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and dose-response analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Xin-Yue Yang, Pan Xu, Xin Tan +5
    Nutrition journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{zamanian2026effect,
  title = {{The effect of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials}},
  author = {Nazanin Zamanian and Sepide Talebi and Mehran Rahimlou and Hamed Mohammadi},
  journal = {BMC Nutrition},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The effect of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU  - Nazanin Zamanian
AU  - Sepide Talebi
AU  - Mehran Rahimlou
AU  - Hamed Mohammadi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC Nutrition
DO  - 10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9
AB  - Background and aims: While the cholesterol-lowering properties of phytosterols are well established, their effects on cardiovascular health, particularly endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation, remain insufficiently explored. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function in adults using key vascular biomarkers.  Methods and results: A systematic search of major databases up to March 2026 identified randomized controlled trials comparing phytosterol supplementation with placebo or control. Eligible studies assessed endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) or markers of endothelial activation, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). Random-effects models were applied to pool effect sizes, and subgroup and dose-response analyses were performed. Ten randomized controlled studies (14 effect sizes; 1,278 participants) were included, comprising six studies contributing eight effect sizes for FMD (n = 802) and four studies contributing six effect sizes for VCAM-1 (n = 476). Phytosterol supplementation showed no significant effect on FMD (mean difference: -0.05%, 95% CI: -0.61 to 0.51; P = 0.857) or VCAM-1 (standardized mean difference: -0.16, 95% CI: − 0.34 to 0.03; P = 0.098). Dose-response and meta-regression analyses indicated no significant association of either dose or treatment duration with endothelial outcomes (all P > 0.3).  Conclusion: Based on current evidence, no statistically significant effect of phytosterol supplementation on endothelial function was observed. Further long-term, well-designed randomized trials, particularly in high-risk populations, are required to better elucidate potential vascular effects.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01443-9.
SN  - 2055-0928
ER  -