Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Comparative transcriptomic responses of tomato to Xanthomonas strains isolated from different hosts

  1. 1Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Ciencias Naturales, Grupo de Bioquímica y Biotecnología, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
  2. 2Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Bacterial spot disease, caused by several Xanthomonas species, poses a significant threat to tomato and pepper production worldwide. Among these pathogens, Xanthomonas vesicatoria and Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria have emerged as particularly important pathogens due to their widespread distribution and economic impact. While both pathogens cause similar symptoms, their genetic and pathogenic differences influence infection dynamics. In this study, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis of tomato plants infected with one strain of X. vesicatoria (isolated from tomato) and one of X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria (isolated from pepper) to elucidate differential gene expression patterns associated with tomato defense responses. RNA sequencing at 48 hours post-infection revealed a higher number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to X. vesicatoria, with significant enrichment in pathways related to cell wall modification, secondary metabolism, and phytohormone signaling. On the other hand, infection with X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria induced a more limited transcriptomic response, with upregulation of a lesser number of genes involved in stress response. Key defense-related genes, including pathogenesis-related proteins (PR1, PR2, PR5), chitinases, and peroxidases, were activated in both infections but showed higher expression levels in response to X. vesicatoria. These findings suggest that X. vesicatoria elicits a stronger immune response in tomato plants than X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria under the conditions tested. This differential response likely reflects distinct interaction strategies employed by these strains during host colonization. Overall, our study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying tomato-Xanthomonas interactions and identifies potential molecular targets for developing bacterial spot-resistant cultivars.

Related

  1. Blood and saliva provide complementary but non-redundant host transcriptomic responses to cancer
    Srinivas V Koduru, Mark Kidd, Abdel Halim
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. Skeletal Muscle Transcriptomic Responses to a High-Fat, High-Sugar Diet Across Sex and Maturation in Mice
    Emiliana Giacomello, Pablo Giraudi, Natalia Rosso +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Dietary Responses in the Diabetic Brain: Transcriptomic Convergence and Comparison with an Alzheimer’s Disease Model
    Bernard Kordas, Judyta K. Juranek
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biochemistryCrossref
  4. Integrated Transcriptomic and Biochemical Analyses Reveal Coordinated Suppression of ER-Associated Survival Signaling and Activation of ROS-Mediated Stress Responses by Oxidized Graphene Quantum Dots in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Wei-Chung Shia, Chien-Te Hsieh, Po-Chih Yang +2
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biochemistryCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Spatial and single-nucleus transcriptomic profiling reveal polarity and intracellular responses to mitochondrial dysfunction
    Yanqiao Zhu, Minxuan Li, Jiahao Li +10
    The Plant CellPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{sanchezgimenez2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative transcriptomic responses of tomato to Xanthomonas strains isolated from different hosts}},
  author = {Lorena Sánchez-Giménez and Eugenio Llorens and Atefeh Farvardin and Jaime Cubero and Loredana Scalschi and Begonya Vicedo and Gemma Camañes},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361370},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361370},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative transcriptomic responses of tomato to Xanthomonas strains isolated from different hosts
AU  - Lorena Sánchez-Giménez
AU  - Eugenio Llorens
AU  - Atefeh Farvardin
AU  - Jaime Cubero
AU  - Loredana Scalschi
AU  - Begonya Vicedo
AU  - Gemma Camañes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361370
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361370
AB  - Bacterial spot disease, caused by several Xanthomonas species, poses a significant threat to tomato and pepper production worldwide. Among these pathogens, Xanthomonas vesicatoria and Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria have emerged as particularly important pathogens due to their widespread distribution and economic impact. While both pathogens cause similar symptoms, their genetic and pathogenic differences influence infection dynamics. In this study, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis of tomato plants infected with one strain of X. vesicatoria (isolated from tomato) and one of X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria (isolated from pepper) to elucidate differential gene expression patterns associated with tomato defense responses. RNA sequencing at 48 hours post-infection revealed a higher number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to X. vesicatoria, with significant enrichment in pathways related to cell wall modification, secondary metabolism, and phytohormone signaling. On the other hand, infection with X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria induced a more limited transcriptomic response, with upregulation of a lesser number of genes involved in stress response. Key defense-related genes, including pathogenesis-related proteins (PR1, PR2, PR5), chitinases, and peroxidases, were activated in both infections but showed higher expression levels in response to X. vesicatoria. These findings suggest that X. vesicatoria elicits a stronger immune response in tomato plants than X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria under the conditions tested. This differential response likely reflects distinct interaction strategies employed by these strains during host colonization. Overall, our study provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying tomato-Xanthomonas interactions and identifies potential molecular targets for developing bacterial spot-resistant cultivars.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -