Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Prospector: learning a compact graph traversal policy for scientific reasoning

Abstract

Scientific reasoning in specialized engineering fields depends on knowledge scattered across the literature, often proprietary and absent from frontier LLM training data. In such domains, frontier models tend to give generic answers. Knowledge graphs (KGs) can ground LLM reasoning. Because a graph is too large to provide in full, typical LLM+KG systems preselect a portion, deciding relevance before reasoning begins. Here we train a compact model, Prospector, to reason over a domain knowledge graph by traversing it step by step, seeking evidence in light of what it has already found. Prospector calls a small set of tools one at a time to progressively build its context, and answers with a chain of evidence that can be checked edge by edge against what its tools retrieved from the graph. On a knowledge graph built from the semiconductor-manufacturing literature, Prospector approaches the strongest off-the-shelf models given the same graph and tools, and it far exceeds off-the-shelf models answering closed-book or from a pre-selected portion of the graph. Although trained only on the semiconductor graph, Prospector transfers to unseen knowledge graphs from three other distinct fields: bio-inspired materials, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and materials properties. Served on a single GPU, Prospector answers faster and at a fraction of the cost of a hosted service, while keeping proprietary data on the owner's hardware. We find that the policy's latent state is indicative of its next move on both seen and unseen graphs, and modulating the latent state can steer the policy from one behavior mode to another. These results suggest a practical LLM + KG paradigm for scientific and engineering reasoning over private data, in which a compact model trained on a graph from published literature transfers its traversal to unseen graphs that stay with their owners.

Related

  1. Deep Scientific Reasoning under Physical Constraints: Structure-Aware Spectrum Prediction
    Yingheng Wang, Tao Yu, Shufeng Kong +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. On physical implementability of reinforcement-learning-driven reasoning
    Eiji Konishi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  3. The Mechanics of Delta Learning: Target Design for Generalizable Scientific Machine Learning
    Kareem M. Gameel, Ihor Neporozhnii, Sjoerd Hoogland +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryComputational physicsarXiv
  4. FlowMLLab: An open-source framework for reproducible computational-fluid-dynamics and scientific-machine-learning experiments
    Ehsan Roohi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral physicsarXiv
  5. Decoding complexity through machine learning is redefining scientific discovery
    Ricardo Vinuesa, Paola Cinnella, Jean Rabault +10
    Communications PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text3 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026prospector,
  title = {{Prospector: learning a compact graph traversal policy for scientific reasoning}},
  author = {Haiqian Yang and Markus J. Buehler},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.37121},
  eprint = {2610.37121},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37121},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Prospector: learning a compact graph traversal policy for scientific reasoning
AU  - Haiqian Yang
AU  - Markus J. Buehler
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.37121
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37121
AB  - Scientific reasoning in specialized engineering fields depends on knowledge scattered across the literature, often proprietary and absent from frontier LLM training data. In such domains, frontier models tend to give generic answers. Knowledge graphs (KGs) can ground LLM reasoning. Because a graph is too large to provide in full, typical LLM+KG systems preselect a portion, deciding relevance before reasoning begins. Here we train a compact model, Prospector, to reason over a domain knowledge graph by traversing it step by step, seeking evidence in light of what it has already found. Prospector calls a small set of tools one at a time to progressively build its context, and answers with a chain of evidence that can be checked edge by edge against what its tools retrieved from the graph. On a knowledge graph built from the semiconductor-manufacturing literature, Prospector approaches the strongest off-the-shelf models given the same graph and tools, and it far exceeds off-the-shelf models answering closed-book or from a pre-selected portion of the graph. Although trained only on the semiconductor graph, Prospector transfers to unseen knowledge graphs from three other distinct fields: bio-inspired materials, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and materials properties. Served on a single GPU, Prospector answers faster and at a fraction of the cost of a hosted service, while keeping proprietary data on the owner's hardware. We find that the policy's latent state is indicative of its next move on both seen and unseen graphs, and modulating the latent state can steer the policy from one behavior mode to another. These results suggest a practical LLM + KG paradigm for scientific and engineering reasoning over private data, in which a compact model trained on a graph from published literature transfers its traversal to unseen graphs that stay with their owners.
ER  -