Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Prior knowledge reveals two computational regimes for syntactic processing in the human brain

  1. 1Goethe University Frankfurt

Abstract

The human brain rapidly transforms continuous speech into structured, meaningful linguistic representations, yet how prior knowledge constrains this process remains unclear. To characterize this influence, we combined MEG recordings acquired during audiobook listening with corpus-derived transition probabilities over syntactic features defined within both phrase-structure and dependency-based grammars. Prior knowledge enhanced the neural representation of memory-related features indexing syntactic structures that must remain open for future completion, an effect that generalized across grammatical formalisms. This enhancement was strictly local: only immediately preceding contexts improved neural decoding at both word onset and offset, whereas longer histories either returned decoding performance to baseline at the word level or impaired decoding. By contrast, integration-related features indexing the completion of syntactic operations showed no benefit from prior knowledge and were represented most strongly at word offset, consistent with structural resolution being implemented as a word-level operation. These dissociable dynamics reveal two concurrent neural computational regimes for syntactic processing: a forward-looking, locally maintained predictive code for pending structure and a backward-looking, integrative code engaged when structure is resolved.

Related

  1. Neuropharmacology of language: ERP evidence for catecholaminergic modulation of syntactic processing
    Yingying Tan, Ashley G. Lewis, Iris C. Schmits +3
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  2. A comprehensive Arabidopsis transcription factor binding atlas reveals pervasive positional and syntactic organization of their DNA binding
    A. JEGOU, J. LUCAS, M. DREUILLET +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
  3. Cell-type-specific modularity in E/I networks shapes dynamical regimes and computational capabilities
    Emmanouil Giannakakis, Victor Buendía, Oleg Vinogradov +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Biased processing of multiple outcomes in human reinforcement learning: evidence from computational modeling and eye-tracking
    Henri Vandendriessche, Gruson Charlotte, Antonios Nasioulas +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. Connectome analysis reveals brain-wide visual processing in Drosophila
    Sung Yong Kim, Anmo J. Kim
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0NeuroscienceCrossrefCell Press
BibTeX
@misc{iaia2026prior,
  title = {{Prior knowledge reveals two computational regimes for syntactic processing in the human brain}},
  author = {C. Iaia and A. Tavano},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.07.11.737945},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.737945v2},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Prior knowledge reveals two computational regimes for syntactic processing in the human brain
AU  - C. Iaia
AU  - A. Tavano
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/11
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.07.11.737945
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.737945v2
AB  - The human brain rapidly transforms continuous speech into structured, meaningful linguistic representations, yet how prior knowledge constrains this process remains unclear. To characterize this influence, we combined MEG recordings acquired during audiobook listening with corpus-derived transition probabilities over syntactic features defined within both phrase-structure and dependency-based grammars. Prior knowledge enhanced the neural representation of memory-related features indexing syntactic structures that must remain open for future completion, an effect that generalized across grammatical formalisms. This enhancement was strictly local: only immediately preceding contexts improved neural decoding at both word onset and offset, whereas longer histories either returned decoding performance to baseline at the word level or impaired decoding. By contrast, integration-related features indexing the completion of syntactic operations showed no benefit from prior knowledge and were represented most strongly at word offset, consistent with structural resolution being implemented as a word-level operation. These dissociable dynamics reveal two concurrent neural computational regimes for syntactic processing: a forward-looking, locally maintained predictive code for pending structure and a backward-looking, integrative code engaged when structure is resolved.
ER  -