Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC Public Health

Harnessing survey data across multiple demographic groups in Illinois to assess survey questions and reveal insights about ticks and tick-borne disease risk: a meta-comparison study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) are major public and veterinary health issues, existing at the intersection of behavioral, environmental, ecological, climatic, and entomological factors. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) surveys have become an insightful tool to yield information regarding the behavioral factors that can predispose individuals to TTBDs. Here we present a unique meta-comparison study of six KAP surveys on TTBDs conducted in Illinois among various demographics: farmers, Extension workers, general public, veterinary, human medicine, and public health professionals. Our goals were multi-fold: (a) to develop an approach to compare KAP surveys used across several stakeholders on a subject of public health concern (i.e., TTBD risk), (b) to analyze the usefulness of questions for revealing information on TTBDs across varied demographic groups in Illinois, and (c) to reveal qualitative insights from the open text survey responses across these surveyed groups. METHODS: We conducted comparative and item response theory (IRT) analysis of all the surveyed questions, which yielded a final set of 39 questions on knowledge and practices, most of them with discriminatory power. Independent textual analysis of the survey responses led to the development of eight separate sub-categories across three main super categories: ticks and tick-borne disease (TBD) risk, TBD treatment and management, and TBD prevention. RESULTS: This study not only introduces a novel approach for comparing multiple KAP surveys on the topic of TTBDs, but also highlights gaps regarding TTBD knowledge, perceptions, and prevention measures among a variety of stakeholders and calls for tailored training and awareness campaigns to reduce the burden of TBDs in the Midwestern US. This meta-comparison approach unveils additional insights from the combined analyses of the KAP surveys. We also discuss perspectives of the surveyed demographics, their experiences with TTBDs, and provide recommendations for future public health efforts. CONCLUSION: These results can guide public health campaigns around TBDs in the United States and help reduce the increasing burden of TBDs on humans and animals.

Related

  1. Attempts to investigate what words trivia experts focus on in quiz questions: Human-AI comparison through “LLM-as-a-judge” approach
    Masaru Shirasuna, Yuto Yoshida
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
  2. Multiple introductions shaped genomic diversity and demographic history of invasive box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) populations in North America
    A. Basnet, T. Choudhary, J. Antonides +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  3. A comparison of female competitive traits: Female aggression peaks at nest building but female song spans multiple contexts in a temperate songbird
    M. Gleason, C. Krieg, K. Ododm
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text1 citedZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  4. Southern Illinois Soybean Varieties: Implications for Relative Livestock Feed Value Scores, Modeled Soybean Meal Values, and Livestock Diet Formulation.
    Jayakrishnan Nair, Richard Bien, Mrudhula Sajeevadathan +8
    Animals : an open access journal from MDPIPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Detection of Red Crown Rot of Soybean in Illinois Fields Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning
    B. D. Pugliese, J. A. Paredes, A. F. Ruiz +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPlant biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{chakraborty2026harnessing,
  title = {{Harnessing survey data across multiple demographic groups in Illinois to assess survey questions and reveal insights about ticks and tick-borne disease risk: a meta-comparison study}},
  author = {Sulagna Chakraborty and Abrar Hussain and Nohra Mateus-Pinilla and Rebecca Smith},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-28618-0},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05734342v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Harnessing survey data across multiple demographic groups in Illinois to assess survey questions and reveal insights about ticks and tick-borne disease risk: a meta-comparison study
AU  - Sulagna Chakraborty
AU  - Abrar Hussain
AU  - Nohra Mateus-Pinilla
AU  - Rebecca Smith
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-28618-0
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05734342v1
AB  - BACKGROUND: Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) are major public and veterinary health issues, existing at the intersection of behavioral, environmental, ecological, climatic, and entomological factors. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) surveys have become an insightful tool to yield information regarding the behavioral factors that can predispose individuals to TTBDs. Here we present a unique meta-comparison study of six KAP surveys on TTBDs conducted in Illinois among various demographics: farmers, Extension workers, general public, veterinary, human medicine, and public health professionals. Our goals were multi-fold: (a) to develop an approach to compare KAP surveys used across several stakeholders on a subject of public health concern (i.e., TTBD risk), (b) to analyze the usefulness of questions for revealing information on TTBDs across varied demographic groups in Illinois, and (c) to reveal qualitative insights from the open text survey responses across these surveyed groups. METHODS: We conducted comparative and item response theory (IRT) analysis of all the surveyed questions, which yielded a final set of 39 questions on knowledge and practices, most of them with discriminatory power. Independent textual analysis of the survey responses led to the development of eight separate sub-categories across three main super categories: ticks and tick-borne disease (TBD) risk, TBD treatment and management, and TBD prevention. RESULTS: This study not only introduces a novel approach for comparing multiple KAP surveys on the topic of TTBDs, but also highlights gaps regarding TTBD knowledge, perceptions, and prevention measures among a variety of stakeholders and calls for tailored training and awareness campaigns to reduce the burden of TBDs in the Midwestern US. This meta-comparison approach unveils additional insights from the combined analyses of the KAP surveys. We also discuss perspectives of the surveyed demographics, their experiences with TTBDs, and provide recommendations for future public health efforts. CONCLUSION: These results can guide public health campaigns around TBDs in the United States and help reduce the increasing burden of TBDs on humans and animals.
SN  - 1471-2458
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -