CO001 | DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF THE BLEEPE SCORE FOR RISK STRATIFICATION OF MAJOR BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM
Abstract
Background and Aims. Major bleeding (MB) is the most feared complication of anticoagulant treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Existing bleeding risk scores showed a modest performance, especially for predicting short-term MB. The aim of this study in patients with acute PE was to develop and validate a risk score for MB at 30 days during anticoagulation: the BLEEPE score. Methods. Data from prospective cohorts of patients with acute PE were merged in a collaborative database. Potential predictors (univariate p-value ≤ 0.1) for MB within 30 days were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model. Candidate predictors were identified and scored based on clinical relevance and β-coefficient and used to derive the BLEEPE score. The score was internally validated by bootstrap and externally validated in the COPE study population (NCT03631810). The performance of the BLEEPE score was assessed by discrimination (c-statistics), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (NPV). Results. Age>65 years, prior MB, syncope, and hemoglobin<11 g/dl were identified as independent predictors of MB in the derivation cohort: incidences of MB in the high and low-risk groups were 7.9% and 1.1%, respectively (HR 7.59, 3.29-17.51) (Table). Incidences in the validation cohort were 6.9% and 1.6%, respectively (HR 4.48, 95% CI 3.39-6.46). C-statistics in derivation and validation cohorts were 0.735 and 0.680, respectively. The NPV was 99% in the derivation and 98% in the validation cohort. Conclusions. The BLEEPE score showed a good accuracy and discrimination for 30-day MB in patients with acute PE. The simple parameters included in the BLEEPE score could help to implement strategies for personalized management in this population.
Related
- Validation and Performance of Five Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prognostication Scores in a Single-Centre United Kingdom Cohort of over 1000 Patients
- Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Medical Patients: A Narrative Review of Risk Stratification, Treatment Duration, and Bleeding Trade-Offs.
- CO040 | MAJOR BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM: RESULTS FROM THE COPE STUDY
- Latent class analysis identifies three biologically distinct phenotypes among patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a derivation and temporal validation study
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of mortality in ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure
BibTeX
@article{vedovati2026co001,
title = {{CO001 | DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF THE BLEEPE SCORE FOR RISK STRATIFICATION OF MAJOR BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM}},
author = {Maria Cristina Vedovati},
journal = {Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
url = {https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/703},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - CO001 | DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF THE BLEEPE SCORE FOR RISK STRATIFICATION OF MAJOR BLEEDING IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM
AU - Maria Cristina Vedovati
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
UR - https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/703
AB - Background and Aims. Major bleeding (MB) is the most feared complication of anticoagulant treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Existing bleeding risk scores showed a modest performance, especially for predicting short-term MB. The aim of this study in patients with acute PE was to develop and validate a risk score for MB at 30 days during anticoagulation: the BLEEPE score. Methods. Data from prospective cohorts of patients with acute PE were merged in a collaborative database. Potential predictors (univariate p-value ≤ 0.1) for MB within 30 days were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model. Candidate predictors were identified and scored based on clinical relevance and β-coefficient and used to derive the BLEEPE score. The score was internally validated by bootstrap and externally validated in the COPE study population (NCT03631810). The performance of the BLEEPE score was assessed by discrimination (c-statistics), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (NPV). Results. Age>65 years, prior MB, syncope, and hemoglobin<11 g/dl were identified as independent predictors of MB in the derivation cohort: incidences of MB in the high and low-risk groups were 7.9% and 1.1%, respectively (HR 7.59, 3.29-17.51) (Table). Incidences in the validation cohort were 6.9% and 1.6%, respectively (HR 4.48, 95% CI 3.39-6.46). C-statistics in derivation and validation cohorts were 0.735 and 0.680, respectively. The NPV was 99% in the derivation and 98% in the validation cohort. Conclusions. The BLEEPE score showed a good accuracy and discrimination for 30-day MB in patients with acute PE. The simple parameters included in the BLEEPE score could help to implement strategies for personalized management in this population.
SN - 2785-5309
ER -