Natural and planted forests differ in the mechanisms regulating productivity and stability
- 1Beijing Forestry University
Abstract
Forest productivity and stability underpin ecosystem functioning and services, yet whether the drivers and mechanisms regulating these properties differ between natural and planted forests at large spatial scales remains unclear. Using data from 2,389 forest plots across China and a novel analytical framework, we systematically compared productivity and stability between natural and planted forests and identified their dominant drivers and underlying mechanisms across 38 biotic, structural, climatic, and edaphic variables. We found that natural forests were 14% more productive and 34% more stable than planted forests, although these differences varied across ecoregions and stand development stages. Productivity in natural forests was primarily driven by functional diversity and functional traits, supporting the niche complementarity and mass-ratio hypotheses, whereas nitrogen availability emerged as the dominant regulator of productivity in planted forests. Likewise, stability shifted from diversity-related regulation in natural forests to stronger abiotic control in planted forests, while functional diversity remained a key stabilizing mechanism in both forest types, supporting the insurance hypothesis. We also found that planted forests were more sensitive to hydroclimatic variability, indicating greater vulnerability to drought. Our findings reveal a fundamental shift in the mechanisms regulating forest productivity and stability from diversity-mediated control in natural forests to stronger abiotic regulation in planted forests, highlighting the importance of integrating biodiversity conservation and nitrogen management to sustain forest productivity and stability under future climate change.
Related
- Evolution of membrane rotary ATP synthases: A trade-off between the net productivity and mechanistic stability?
- Aridity regulates scale-dependent effects of multiple resource additions on productivity stability in Eurasian grasslands
- Natural fire-derived charcoal resembles high-temperature biochar in regulating soil CO2 emissions from a subtropical plantation soil
- Coupled responses of aboveground and belowground net primary productivity stability to nitrogen deposition in grasslands
- Unlocking associative nitrogen fixation in Poaceae: molecular mechanisms, regulatory constraints, and pathways to sustainable productivity
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026natural,
title = {{Natural and planted forests differ in the mechanisms regulating productivity and stability}},
author = {M. Chen and D. Peng and E. Vangi and M. Morichetti and A. Collalti},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.10.750640},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.750640v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Natural and planted forests differ in the mechanisms regulating productivity and stability
AU - M. Chen
AU - D. Peng
AU - E. Vangi
AU - M. Morichetti
AU - A. Collalti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/10
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.10.750640
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.750640v1
AB - Forest productivity and stability underpin ecosystem functioning and services, yet whether the drivers and mechanisms regulating these properties differ between natural and planted forests at large spatial scales remains unclear. Using data from 2,389 forest plots across China and a novel analytical framework, we systematically compared productivity and stability between natural and planted forests and identified their dominant drivers and underlying mechanisms across 38 biotic, structural, climatic, and edaphic variables. We found that natural forests were 14% more productive and 34% more stable than planted forests, although these differences varied across ecoregions and stand development stages. Productivity in natural forests was primarily driven by functional diversity and functional traits, supporting the niche complementarity and mass-ratio hypotheses, whereas nitrogen availability emerged as the dominant regulator of productivity in planted forests. Likewise, stability shifted from diversity-related regulation in natural forests to stronger abiotic control in planted forests, while functional diversity remained a key stabilizing mechanism in both forest types, supporting the insurance hypothesis. We also found that planted forests were more sensitive to hydroclimatic variability, indicating greater vulnerability to drought. Our findings reveal a fundamental shift in the mechanisms regulating forest productivity and stability from diversity-mediated control in natural forests to stronger abiotic regulation in planted forests, highlighting the importance of integrating biodiversity conservation and nitrogen management to sustain forest productivity and stability under future climate change.
ER -