Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Observation-Specific Uncertainty Modeling for Latent-Variable Regression in High-Dimensional Analytical Data

Abstract

Across many fields, including medical diagnostics, process monitoring, and quality control, decisions often rely on point predictions for single samples. Observation-specific uncertainty is needed to assess the risk of decision error when predictions are compared with thresholds. Latent-variable regression is widely used for such predictions, but observation-specific uncertainty remains difficult to estimate. Traditional methods assume unbiased predictions, attributing prediction uncertainty solely to variance. However, dimensionality reduction can introduce observation-specific bias, violating this assumption. We introduce a framework using Gaussian processes trained on latent scores and prediction errors to estimate observation-specific bias and error variance, separating systematic error from epistemic and aleatoric variance. In Raman measurements of a fructose-sucrose model system, estimated prediction-error distributions agreed with empirical distributions; bias correction reduced mean squared error, and decision limits incorporating bias and variance improved analyte detection over variance-only limits. An aqueous-solubility application using molecular descriptors demonstrated the framework's generalisation beyond spectroscopy.

Related

  1. Online Bayesian Model Averaging with Joint Uncertainty Quantification for Models and Regression Coefficients in Binary Regression
    Joyee Ghosh, Aixin Tan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Correctness and Predictive Uncertainty in Bayesian TSK Fuzzy Regression: A Reproducible Evaluation on Tabular and Building-Meter Data
    Zhiren Xiao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Three-Dimensional Analytical Model of Axial Flux Magnetic Gear Based on Harmonic Modeling
    Manh-Dung Nguyen, Duy-Tinh Hoang, Kyung-Hun Shin +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  4. Evaluating heart rate coupling with Multi-dimensional Recurrence Quantification Analysis (MdRQA) and Cross-Correlation (CC): Analytical decisions and implications
    Alon Tomashin, Ilanit Gordon, Sebastian Wallot
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPhysiologyPLOS
  5. Central limit theorems for high-dimensional ridge regression under uniform subsampling
    Thomas Lam, Nina Dörnemann, Holger Dette
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{eskildsen2026observationspecific,
  title = {{Observation-Specific Uncertainty Modeling for Latent-Variable Regression in High-Dimensional Analytical Data}},
  author = {Carl Emil Eskildsen and Georgios Papadopoulos and Kevin A. Giraldo and Mauricio Barahona and Molly M. Stevens},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.41815},
  eprint = {2610.41815},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41815},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Observation-Specific Uncertainty Modeling for Latent-Variable Regression in High-Dimensional Analytical Data
AU  - Carl Emil Eskildsen
AU  - Georgios Papadopoulos
AU  - Kevin A. Giraldo
AU  - Mauricio Barahona
AU  - Molly M. Stevens
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.41815
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41815
AB  - Across many fields, including medical diagnostics, process monitoring, and quality control, decisions often rely on point predictions for single samples. Observation-specific uncertainty is needed to assess the risk of decision error when predictions are compared with thresholds. Latent-variable regression is widely used for such predictions, but observation-specific uncertainty remains difficult to estimate. Traditional methods assume unbiased predictions, attributing prediction uncertainty solely to variance. However, dimensionality reduction can introduce observation-specific bias, violating this assumption. We introduce a framework using Gaussian processes trained on latent scores and prediction errors to estimate observation-specific bias and error variance, separating systematic error from epistemic and aleatoric variance. In Raman measurements of a fructose-sucrose model system, estimated prediction-error distributions agreed with empirical distributions; bias correction reduced mean squared error, and decision limits incorporating bias and variance improved analyte detection over variance-only limits. An aqueous-solubility application using molecular descriptors demonstrated the framework's generalisation beyond spectroscopy.
ER  -