Constitutive-Set Mechanics: variational mechanics on an admissible set of constitutive laws
Abstract
A structural simulation needs a constitutive law, and experiments rarely determine one uniquely: several laws may fit the same data and satisfy the same physical constraints, yet differ where the structure is loaded in ways the tests never were. Constitutive-Set Mechanics (CSM) keeps all of those laws. It replaces the single law in the variational formulation by the admissible set, and lets the mechanics itself decide which members of the set affect the structural prediction. The framework rests on one observation: a finite element assembly consults the law only at the strains the structure reaches, so the incremental energy depends on the law through a weighted record of those strains, the occupation measure of the state. The energy of a state under the set is a support function on that measure, and the equilibrium solve one performs anyway supplies the information needed to bound the worst case. Equilibrium states become certificates on the robust response, rigorous on the upper side for any mechanics solver and two-sided under global minimisation; the certificate has at most one more state than the number of constitutive directions the structure interrogates; a coherence theorem identifies when the pointwise-worst material is one no single material can be; and constitutive inference acts on the same support function. The method is demonstrated on linear elasticity, a data-constrained constitutive function, phase-field fracture, an assembled finite-strain composite shell, and a membrane characterised by one-mode tests alone. On the shell the structure interrogates four of 226 constitutive directions; on the membrane the certified worst-case energy exceeds the reference more than fourfold, and the experiment that most contracts the certified prediction is not the one where the constitutive uncertainty is largest.
Related
- Mechanism-resolved phase-field fracture of composite shells with a certified admissible constitutive operator
- A compatibility--realization framework for singular Navier--Stokes flows: admissible families and non-rigid core mechanics
- Well-posed by Design: Learning Constitutive Laws from Velocity Data using Convex Neural Network Potentials
- Variational formulation of the constitutive relaxation at finite rate of the mechanical state in multiphase flows with the diffuse-interface method
- Variational learning of energy-stable macroscopic flow equations from microscopic laws
BibTeX
@misc{lone2026constitutiveset,
title = {{Constitutive-Set Mechanics: variational mechanics on an admissible set of constitutive laws}},
author = {Altaf Ahmad Lone and R. T. Durai Prabhakaran and Tawqeer Nasir Tak and Timon Rabczuk and Xiaoying Zhuang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.07151},
eprint = {2610.07151},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07151},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Constitutive-Set Mechanics: variational mechanics on an admissible set of constitutive laws
AU - Altaf Ahmad Lone
AU - R. T. Durai Prabhakaran
AU - Tawqeer Nasir Tak
AU - Timon Rabczuk
AU - Xiaoying Zhuang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.07151
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07151
AB - A structural simulation needs a constitutive law, and experiments rarely determine one uniquely: several laws may fit the same data and satisfy the same physical constraints, yet differ where the structure is loaded in ways the tests never were. Constitutive-Set Mechanics (CSM) keeps all of those laws. It replaces the single law in the variational formulation by the admissible set, and lets the mechanics itself decide which members of the set affect the structural prediction. The framework rests on one observation: a finite element assembly consults the law only at the strains the structure reaches, so the incremental energy depends on the law through a weighted record of those strains, the occupation measure of the state. The energy of a state under the set is a support function on that measure, and the equilibrium solve one performs anyway supplies the information needed to bound the worst case. Equilibrium states become certificates on the robust response, rigorous on the upper side for any mechanics solver and two-sided under global minimisation; the certificate has at most one more state than the number of constitutive directions the structure interrogates; a coherence theorem identifies when the pointwise-worst material is one no single material can be; and constitutive inference acts on the same support function. The method is demonstrated on linear elasticity, a data-constrained constitutive function, phase-field fracture, an assembled finite-strain composite shell, and a membrane characterised by one-mode tests alone. On the shell the structure interrogates four of 226 constitutive directions; on the membrane the certified worst-case energy exceeds the reference more than fourfold, and the experiment that most contracts the certified prediction is not the one where the constitutive uncertainty is largest.
ER -