A practical route to amorphous solid-state electrolyte structures by hybrid reverse Monte Carlo with foundation potentials
Abstract
Amorphous alkali oxychlorides are fast ion conductors, but their atomic structure remains unresolved. Total scattering sums all partial pair correlations into one curve that has no unique inversion, so the structure must be modeled. Melt-quench molecular dynamics builds a model from the interatomic potential alone, and reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) builds one from the measurement alone. The two have rarely been compared with all else held fixed. We benchmark both routes and two hybrid schemes on amorphous \ce{Li_{0.9}NbO_{0.9}Cl_{4.1}} against one neutron pair distribution function with one foundation potential. The hybrid schemes put the energy either in the acceptance rule (inline) or in short relaxations between blocks of refinement (alternating). Each refinement starts from a melt-quench glass or from a random packing of isolated units. The glass has the lowest energy and places the first-shell peaks correctly, but carries almost none of the oscillation beyond 6~Å (goodness of fit R2 = 0.29). Pure RMC fits the measurement to within its counting noise (R2 = 0.99), but at more than $1.3$~eV/atom above the glass, and niobium loses about half of its first-shell chlorine. Started from the glass, both hybrid schemes reach R2 = 0.92 within $0.1$~eV/atom of its energy and keep its coordination chemistry. Structures from the two inputs fit almost equally well and differ in energy by a tenth of the RMC penalty, yet they differ in whether their polyhedra are connected. The input is therefore part of the method. We recommend quenching a glass with a foundation potential and refining it against the measurement with a hybrid scheme. The resulting structure carries both the local chemistry and the medium-range order, and it is the starting point for modeling ion transport in these conductors.
Related
- Elastic properties of amorphous LiTaCl6 solid-state electrolyte
- Distilling Large-Scale Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials to Predict Long-Timescale Electrolyte Transport Properties
- ATLAS: A Foundation Neural Sampler for Amorphous Materials
- A latent-space extrapolation grade built into graph atomic cluster expansion foundation potentials
- FP-DeErr: Application-Oriented Error Decomposition for Foundation Potentials
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026practical,
title = {{A practical route to amorphous solid-state electrolyte structures by hybrid reverse Monte Carlo with foundation potentials}},
author = {Xintian Wang and Xinyu Zhang and Denys Butenko and Bolong Hong and Jinlong Zhu and Peichen Zhong},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.19846},
eprint = {2610.19846},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19846},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A practical route to amorphous solid-state electrolyte structures by hybrid reverse Monte Carlo with foundation potentials
AU - Xintian Wang
AU - Xinyu Zhang
AU - Denys Butenko
AU - Bolong Hong
AU - Jinlong Zhu
AU - Peichen Zhong
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19846
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19846
AB - Amorphous alkali oxychlorides are fast ion conductors, but their atomic structure remains unresolved. Total scattering sums all partial pair correlations into one curve that has no unique inversion, so the structure must be modeled. Melt-quench molecular dynamics builds a model from the interatomic potential alone, and reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) builds one from the measurement alone. The two have rarely been compared with all else held fixed. We benchmark both routes and two hybrid schemes on amorphous \ce{Li_{0.9}NbO_{0.9}Cl_{4.1}} against one neutron pair distribution function with one foundation potential. The hybrid schemes put the energy either in the acceptance rule (inline) or in short relaxations between blocks of refinement (alternating). Each refinement starts from a melt-quench glass or from a random packing of isolated units. The glass has the lowest energy and places the first-shell peaks correctly, but carries almost none of the oscillation beyond 6~Å (goodness of fit R^2 = 0.29). Pure RMC fits the measurement to within its counting noise (R^2 = 0.99), but at more than $1.3$~eV/atom above the glass, and niobium loses about half of its first-shell chlorine. Started from the glass, both hybrid schemes reach R^2 = 0.92 within $0.1$~eV/atom of its energy and keep its coordination chemistry. Structures from the two inputs fit almost equally well and differ in energy by a tenth of the RMC penalty, yet they differ in whether their polyhedra are connected. The input is therefore part of the method. We recommend quenching a glass with a foundation potential and refining it against the measurement with a hybrid scheme. The resulting structure carries both the local chemistry and the medium-range order, and it is the starting point for modeling ion transport in these conductors.
ER -