Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,625 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Ampleness in the Farey graph

Abstract

We show that the first-order theory of the Farey graph is $1$-ample but not $2$-ample. Along the way, we prove that it weakly eliminates imaginaries and observe that forking is trivial.

Related

  1. Ampleness of non-symmetric line bundles on degenerations of abelian varieties
    Kenz Kallal
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  2. Joint partial equidistribution of Farey rays in negatively curved manifolds and trees
    Jouni Parkkonen, Frédéric Paulin
    HALPreprintHAL deposit licenceFull text4 citedAlgebra & number theoryDynamical systemsHAL
  3. Obstructions to the ampleness of invariant jet differentials on complete intersections
    Simone Diverio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Chern Holomorphic Sectional Curvature: Canonical Ampleness, Rigidity, and Flatness Counterexamples
    Xiangsen Qin, Yuanhong Tian
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Denominators in the Farey Sequence, the Stern Sequence, and the Frobenius Problem with Relatively Prime Multipliers
    Grace Natalie Jaffe
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{khangheshlaghi2026ampleness,
  title = {{Ampleness in the Farey graph}},
  author = {Zahra Mohammadi Khangheshlaghi and Rizos Sklinos},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.02427},
  eprint = {2609.02427},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02427},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ampleness in the Farey graph
AU  - Zahra Mohammadi Khangheshlaghi
AU  - Rizos Sklinos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.02427
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02427
AB  - We show that the first-order theory of the Farey graph is $1$-ample but not $2$-ample. Along the way, we prove that it weakly eliminates imaginaries and observe that forking is trivial.
ER  -