Phylogenetic parallelograms: visual comparison of discordant phylogenetic trees
- 1Univ. of Tubingen
Abstract
Phylogenetic trees inferred from different genomic regions, or from organellar and nuclear genomes, frequently disagree owing to incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization, introgression or horizontal gene transfer. Such discordance is informative, yet the standard tool for comparing trees visually, the tanglegram, is restricted to two trees and is known to misrepresent their similarity. Here we introduce phylogenetic parallelograms, drawings in which any number of rooted trees are embedded into a common scaffold, a rooted phylogenetic network that displays all of them, and are drawn in parallel so that shared branches align while conflicting branches visibly diverge. On synthetic tree pairs, the complexity of a parallelogram tracks the topological distance between the trees, whereas the complexity of an optimized tanglegram does not. We apply the approach to genome-wide introgression in the Anopheles gambiae species complex and to organellar discordance in cats, grasses and Fagaceae. PhyloParallelograms is an open-source interactive application.
Related
- Forecasting viral evolution from phylogenetic trees
- An extension of the classic Buneman theorem from phylogenetic trees to networks
- Rclade: automated taxonomic collapsing and geological-timescale annotation of time-calibrated phylogenetic trees in R
- BME-like Quartet Weights for Phylogenetic Trees
- Consensus methods for trees of blobs and level-1 phylogenetic networks
BibTeX
@misc{huson2026phylogenetic,
title = {{Phylogenetic parallelograms: visual comparison of discordant phylogenetic trees}},
author = {D. H. Huson and B. Cetinkaya and L. Zhang},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.18.752558},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.18.752558v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Phylogenetic parallelograms: visual comparison of discordant phylogenetic trees
AU - D. H. Huson
AU - B. Cetinkaya
AU - L. Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.18.752558
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.18.752558v1
AB - Phylogenetic trees inferred from different genomic regions, or from organellar and nuclear genomes, frequently disagree owing to incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization, introgression or horizontal gene transfer. Such discordance is informative, yet the standard tool for comparing trees visually, the tanglegram, is restricted to two trees and is known to misrepresent their similarity. Here we introduce phylogenetic parallelograms, drawings in which any number of rooted trees are embedded into a common scaffold, a rooted phylogenetic network that displays all of them, and are drawn in parallel so that shared branches align while conflicting branches visibly diverge. On synthetic tree pairs, the complexity of a parallelogram tracks the topological distance between the trees, whereas the complexity of an optimized tanglegram does not. We apply the approach to genome-wide introgression in the Anopheles gambiae species complex and to organellar discordance in cats, grasses and Fagaceae. PhyloParallelograms is an open-source interactive application.
ER -