Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sparsifying Stochasticity, Not Capacity: Partial Stochasticity via Deep Weight Factorization of Prior Scales

Abstract

Bayesian neural networks need not be fully stochastic to be universal conditional density approximators, but it remains open which parameters should be stochastic. We learn this split by applying deep weight factorization to the prior scales, which are the standard deviations of the parameter priors, while fitting the functional prior to a Gaussian process with a maximum mean discrepancy objective. A parameter whose prior scale falls below a cutoff becomes deterministic and is optimized during inference, so the regularizer sparsifies stochasticity rather than capacity. We give a certificate for universal conditional density approximation that is checkable in linear time, together with a minimal repair when it fails. We further show that the common hybrid scheme of sampling some parameters and optimizing the others is stochastic approximation for a type-II maximum a posteriori objective, and that coupled step sizes can leave a tracking error that does not vanish as the step size shrinks. On a bimodal target, the learned split stays close to an unconstrained reference across all budgets and is insensitive to the cutoff, while random masks that distribute the same prior scales across layers are worse by up to two orders of magnitude. On UCI benchmarks, our method performs on par with a fully stochastic network while keeping about half of its parameters deterministic.

Related

  1. Partial factorization and reflexivity of operator algebras
    Fengyang Jia, Guoxing Ji
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Long-time stochasticity for periodic iterations of random surface maps
    Dmitry Dolgopyat, Bassam Fayad, Alexey Okunev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. Continuous-Time Trajectory Generation from Discrete Observations with Stochasticity
    Ruifeng Shang, Shu Liu, Yuhua Zhu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textDynamical systemsStatisticsarXiv
  4. Sharp Probabilistic Normwise Backward Error Bounds for LU Factorization
    Liam Burke, El-Mehdi El Arar, Stef Graillat +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingProbabilityHAL
  5. A Categorical Realization of the (2-)Category of Monoids via Sch{ü}tzenberger Categories and Strict Factorization Systems
    Xavier Mary
    CompositionalityPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{linhard2026sparsifying,
  title = {{Sparsifying Stochasticity, Not Capacity: Partial Stochasticity via Deep Weight Factorization of Prior Scales}},
  author = {Marius P Linhard and Maurizio Filippone},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09886},
  eprint = {2610.09886},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09886},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sparsifying Stochasticity, Not Capacity: Partial Stochasticity via Deep Weight Factorization of Prior Scales
AU  - Marius P Linhard
AU  - Maurizio Filippone
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09886
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09886
AB  - Bayesian neural networks need not be fully stochastic to be universal conditional density approximators, but it remains open which parameters should be stochastic. We learn this split by applying deep weight factorization to the prior scales, which are the standard deviations of the parameter priors, while fitting the functional prior to a Gaussian process with a maximum mean discrepancy objective. A parameter whose prior scale falls below a cutoff becomes deterministic and is optimized during inference, so the regularizer sparsifies stochasticity rather than capacity. We give a certificate for universal conditional density approximation that is checkable in linear time, together with a minimal repair when it fails. We further show that the common hybrid scheme of sampling some parameters and optimizing the others is stochastic approximation for a type-II maximum a posteriori objective, and that coupled step sizes can leave a tracking error that does not vanish as the step size shrinks. On a bimodal target, the learned split stays close to an unconstrained reference across all budgets and is insensitive to the cutoff, while random masks that distribute the same prior scales across layers are worse by up to two orders of magnitude. On UCI benchmarks, our method performs on par with a fully stochastic network while keeping about half of its parameters deterministic.
ER  -