Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Proteomic signatures of vaccine-induced immunity in teleost fish: from antigen discovery to correlates of protection

  1. 1Nitte (Deemed to be University), Center for Omics & Systems Medicine (C-OSM), Department of Biochemistry, KS. Hegde Medical Academy (KSHEMA)

Abstract

Fish-vaccine efficacy in teleosts is still established primarily through pathogen-challenge experiments, which determine whether a formulation protects but provide limited insight into the antigens and immune mechanisms responsible. Proteomics addresses part of this limitation by measuring pathogen proteins and host responses induced by vaccination. This critical narrative review evaluates pathogen-focused and host-response proteomics from antigen discovery through biomarker validation and translational decision-making. We assess quantitative mass spectrometry, immunoproteomics, surfaceome and secretome profiling, and their integration with reverse and systems vaccinology. Across the limited teleost evidence base, vaccination-associated changes involve complement and acute-phase pathways, antigen processing, redox regulation, hemostasis, tissue repair and exosome-associated antigen presentation. Cross-study replication remains weak, and the reported proteins largely represent study-specific vaccine-responsive profiles. More importantly, most studies do not test whether pre-challenge signatures predict subsequent survival, pathogen control or tissue protection. Within the literature reviewed here, no candidate proteomic signature has yet been prospectively replicated in an independent teleost vaccination cohort; therefore, none currently meets the requirements of a validated, transferable correlate of protection. The main obstacles include heterogeneous study designs, incomplete reference proteomes, teleost-specific protein-inference challenges, small cohorts, limited longitudinal sampling and scarce external validation. We argue that the principal bottleneck is now study design and validation rather than mass-spectrometric capability alone. We therefore outline a development sequence that begins with infection relevant antigen selection and proceeds through longitudinal profiling, targeted verification, predictive modeling, independent validation and field evaluation. This framework separates vaccine responsiveness, protection association, prediction and mechanism, using proteomics to support vaccine-development decisions while retaining challenge testing.

Related

  1. Tc17-driven antibody-independent mucosal immunity is critical for protection against extracellular bacterial pneumonia
    Y. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. Chen +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  2. Limited cross strain CMV protection by a bivalent (gB/pp65) vaccine is based on an impaired gB antibody response and evasion of pp65 cell mediated immunity
    K. Yeon Choi, Yushu Qin, Nadia El-Hamdi +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxivPMC
  3. Use of Integrative Proteomic Analysis to Uncover Shared Molecular Signatures Across Distinct Forms of Hydrocephalus
    G. Mahendran, P. Kirupaharan, D. Audu +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Ultrastructural and Proteomic Signatures of Mechanoadaptive Fibroblast Remodeling across Microphysiological and Mesoscale Shear Platforms
    S. Min, H.-S. Jin, G. Kidd +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  5. Stage-specific proteomic signatures of synaptopathy in Alzheimers disease
    T. Georgiades, J. Griffiths, F. Gibbs +8
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{rao2026proteomic,
  title = {{Proteomic signatures of vaccine-induced immunity in teleost fish: from antigen discovery to correlates of protection}},
  author = {Shreesha Sadashiva Rao and T. S. Keshava Prasad},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965383},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965383/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Proteomic signatures of vaccine-induced immunity in teleost fish: from antigen discovery to correlates of protection
AU  - Shreesha Sadashiva Rao
AU  - T. S. Keshava Prasad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965383
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1965383/full
AB  - Fish-vaccine efficacy in teleosts is still established primarily through pathogen-challenge experiments, which determine whether a formulation protects but provide limited insight into the antigens and immune mechanisms responsible. Proteomics addresses part of this limitation by measuring pathogen proteins and host responses induced by vaccination. This critical narrative review evaluates pathogen-focused and host-response proteomics from antigen discovery through biomarker validation and translational decision-making. We assess quantitative mass spectrometry, immunoproteomics, surfaceome and secretome profiling, and their integration with reverse and systems vaccinology. Across the limited teleost evidence base, vaccination-associated changes involve complement and acute-phase pathways, antigen processing, redox regulation, hemostasis, tissue repair and exosome-associated antigen presentation. Cross-study replication remains weak, and the reported proteins largely represent study-specific vaccine-responsive profiles. More importantly, most studies do not test whether pre-challenge signatures predict subsequent survival, pathogen control or tissue protection. Within the literature reviewed here, no candidate proteomic signature has yet been prospectively replicated in an independent teleost vaccination cohort; therefore, none currently meets the requirements of a validated, transferable correlate of protection. The main obstacles include heterogeneous study designs, incomplete reference proteomes, teleost-specific protein-inference challenges, small cohorts, limited longitudinal sampling and scarce external validation. We argue that the principal bottleneck is now study design and validation rather than mass-spectrometric capability alone. We therefore outline a development sequence that begins with infection relevant antigen selection and proceeds through longitudinal profiling, targeted verification, predictive modeling, independent validation and field evaluation. This framework separates vaccine responsiveness, protection association, prediction and mechanism, using proteomics to support vaccine-development decisions while retaining challenge testing.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -