Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Reconstructing constant point heat sources from few temperature sensors: sparse selection and spatial resolution

Abstract

We investigate the recovery of an unknown number of stationary point heat sources, together with their locations and constant positive strengths, from temperature histories recorded by a few sensors. The reconstruction combines candidate selection by orthogonal matching pursuit or least angle regression with continuous constrained fitting. A noise-based discrepancy rule selects the smallest accepted source count among those tested. The analysis distinguishes source-count selection, individual-parameter recovery, and aggregate estimation. For a close pair, the local single-source residual is quadratic in separation when the projected curvature is nonzero, whereas a compensating unit parameter direction produces a linearized response bounded by a constant times the cube of separation. This difference explains why a pair may be distinguishable from a single source while its individual parameters remain poorly determined. A conditional stability bound controls errors in total strength and the strength-weighted center, and a local Gaussian approximation relates single-source rejection to noise and separation. Numerical experiments assess sensor configuration, temporal sampling, noise, separation, and initialization, with additional tests using independently generated finite-plate data and a three-dimensional model. Correct source-count selection need not imply accurate individual parameters, whereas unresolved pairs can retain accurate aggregate estimates.

Related

  1. Vanishing discount selection for constant-sign local perturbations of periodic Hamiltonians
    Andrea Davini
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Minimum-makespan completion and vertex selection leave the Wang-Sitters constant at 11/6
    Adam Y. Shavit
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Evaluating LiDAR Data Sources, Predictor Resolution, and Spatial Random Effects in Bayesian Change-of-Support Models for Forest Inventory
    Arthur Spitta, Andrew O. Finley, Christoph Gollob +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Reconstructing flows from the orbit space
    Thomas Barthelmé, Sergio Fenley, Kathryn Mann
    Communications of the American Mathematical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textDynamical systemsGeometry & topologyHAL
  5. An efficient method for reconstructing the potential in the fractional Calderón problem with a single measurement
    Yun-Long Liu, Jin Wen, Jun-Liang Fu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026reconstructing,
  title = {{Reconstructing constant point heat sources from few temperature sensors: sparse selection and spatial resolution}},
  author = {Xiaomei Yang and Zhiliang Deng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.21301},
  eprint = {2610.21301},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21301},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Reconstructing constant point heat sources from few temperature sensors: sparse selection and spatial resolution
AU  - Xiaomei Yang
AU  - Zhiliang Deng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.21301
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.21301
AB  - We investigate the recovery of an unknown number of stationary point heat sources, together with their locations and constant positive strengths, from temperature histories recorded by a few sensors. The reconstruction combines candidate selection by orthogonal matching pursuit or least angle regression with continuous constrained fitting. A noise-based discrepancy rule selects the smallest accepted source count among those tested. The analysis distinguishes source-count selection, individual-parameter recovery, and aggregate estimation. For a close pair, the local single-source residual is quadratic in separation when the projected curvature is nonzero, whereas a compensating unit parameter direction produces a linearized response bounded by a constant times the cube of separation. This difference explains why a pair may be distinguishable from a single source while its individual parameters remain poorly determined. A conditional stability bound controls errors in total strength and the strength-weighted center, and a local Gaussian approximation relates single-source rejection to noise and separation. Numerical experiments assess sensor configuration, temporal sampling, noise, separation, and initialization, with additional tests using independently generated finite-plate data and a three-dimensional model. Correct source-count selection need not imply accurate individual parameters, whereas unresolved pairs can retain accurate aggregate estimates.
ER  -