Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

ReCIRC: Rectified Conformal Risk Control

Abstract

Many applications of black-box predictive models require controlling task-relevant error rates, such as missed lesion pixels in segmentation or missed labels in multilabel classification. Conformal risk control (CRC; Angelopoulos et al., arXiv:2208.02814) gives distribution-free guarantees for such losses, but it calibrates a single threshold shared by all inputs. Because conditional risk varies with the input, this marginal guarantee often overprotects easy cases and underprotects hard ones. We propose ReCIRC (Rectified Conformal Risk Control), which inverts each input's estimated local risk curve to reparameterize the calibrated threshold as a risk budget a representing a common target conditional risk, and then applies CRC unchanged to the resulting family. ReCIRC retains CRC's finite-sample marginal guarantee regardless of the accuracy of the estimated curves, while accurate curves yield approximate conditional risk control and, under additional conditions, asymptotically exact conditional risk control; they also support a risk-calibration diagnostic. Across three synthetic and five real-data settings spanning segmentation, multilabel and multiclass classification, and regression, ReCIRC attained the lowest average worst-group risk and mean positive group excess in every setting, while maintaining marginal risk close to the target, whereas changes in prediction size were application-dependent.

Related

  1. Conformal Risk-Averse Decision Making with Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk Control
    Amirmohammad Farzaneh, Osvaldo Simeone
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Macro Mondrian Conformal Risk Control
    Julien Combes, Jean-Francois Coeurjolly, Alexandre Dervillé
    HALPreprintLicence Ouverte 2.0Full textStatisticsHALarXiv
  3. Conformal risk control for model-form uncertainty in parametric non-intrusive reduced-order models
    Edgar Jaber, Rémy Vallot, Thibault Dairay +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsHALarXiv
  4. Recertifying decisions via e-closure: uniform improvements of conformal risk control and randomized e-BH
    Tian Bai, Aaditya Ramdas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
    Muhammad Aimal Rehman, Chi-Kuang Yeh
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{resende2026recirc,
  title = {{ReCIRC: Rectified Conformal Risk Control}},
  author = {Bruno Marcondes e Resende and Helton Graziadei and Thiago Rodrigo Ramos and Rafael Izbicki},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38112},
  eprint = {2609.38112},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38112},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - ReCIRC: Rectified Conformal Risk Control
AU  - Bruno Marcondes e Resende
AU  - Helton Graziadei
AU  - Thiago Rodrigo Ramos
AU  - Rafael Izbicki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38112
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38112
AB  - Many applications of black-box predictive models require controlling task-relevant error rates, such as missed lesion pixels in segmentation or missed labels in multilabel classification. Conformal risk control (CRC; Angelopoulos et al., arXiv:2208.02814) gives distribution-free guarantees for such losses, but it calibrates a single threshold shared by all inputs. Because conditional risk varies with the input, this marginal guarantee often overprotects easy cases and underprotects hard ones. We propose ReCIRC (Rectified Conformal Risk Control), which inverts each input's estimated local risk curve to reparameterize the calibrated threshold as a risk budget a representing a common target conditional risk, and then applies CRC unchanged to the resulting family. ReCIRC retains CRC's finite-sample marginal guarantee regardless of the accuracy of the estimated curves, while accurate curves yield approximate conditional risk control and, under additional conditions, asymptotically exact conditional risk control; they also support a risk-calibration diagnostic. Across three synthetic and five real-data settings spanning segmentation, multilabel and multiclass classification, and regression, ReCIRC attained the lowest average worst-group risk and mean positive group excess in every setting, while maintaining marginal risk close to the target, whereas changes in prediction size were application-dependent.
ER  -