Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Mathematics

TriTrust: Risk-Aware Three-Factor Trust Fusion for Secure UAV Handover Admission

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Software Engineering, Kocaeli University, İzmit 41001, Türkiye
  2. 2Interdisciplinary Research Center for Construction and Building Materials, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
  3. 3Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah 21361, Saudi Arabia
  4. 4Interdisciplinary Research Center for Intelligent Secure Systems (IRC-ISS), King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
  5. 5College of Applied Computer Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Cooperative unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms require secure transaction-level admission decisions when tasks, relay roles, control privileges, or mission assets are transferred between aircraft. Existing authentication and intrusion-detection mechanisms address complementary aspects of security and motivate integrating a mandatory protocol check with post-authentication behavioral and corroborative assessment. This paper introduces TriTrust, a risk-aware three-factor trust-fusion architecture that enforces a mandatory protocol-admission gate, followed by logistic fusion of traffic-behavior and competence-weighted witness scores for gate-passing candidates. The framework further incorporates validation-fitted score mapping and robust federated maintenance of the witness classifier. Evaluation on a constructed proxy-handover benchmark derived from public UAV cyber-physical records using cyber-condition-derived labels, sampled gate outcomes, and simulated witness views demonstrates that the modeled gate provides the dominant control over false acceptance: removing it increases mean seed-level raw-score false-acceptance rate (FAR) from 0.43% to 9.62%. Across five prespecified resamplings of the same source corpus, the isotonic-mapped full pipeline attains a mean seed-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9926, a mean FAR of 0.83%, and a mean false-rejection rate (FRR) of 1.75%. Under 20% scaled sign-reversal poisoning, coordinatewise median aggregation maintains mean witness-classifier accuracy of 0.8552, compared with 0.2920 for sample-size-weighted averaging. Feature-space stress tests further show that false acceptance under learned-input manipulation remains limited by the modeled gate, whereas gate bypass combined with learned-factor compromise produces high false-acceptance rates. These results characterize the contributions and failure boundary of protocol gating, post-gate trust fusion, score mapping, and robust federated maintenance within the constructed benchmark.

Related

  1. Learning-Accelerated Optimization-based Trajectory Planning for Cooperative Aerial-Ground Handover Missions
    Jingshan Chen, Bochen Yu, Henrik Ebel +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Capacity-Aware Multi-UE Handover Optimization for LEO Satellite Networks Using Dueling DDQN
    Po-Heng Chou, Chiapin Wang, Chung-Chi Huang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Constructions of Secure Convertible Codes
    Manasa Suresh B P, Vinayak Ramkumar, Myna Vajha
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Progressive-Resolution Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning
    Seyed Mohammad Azimi-Abarghouyi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Secure Domination in Odd-order Sierpinski Graphs
    Qingcheng Zeng, Yumei Xue, Cheng Zeng +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{ghaleb2026tritrust,
  title = {{TriTrust: Risk-Aware Three-Factor Trust Fusion for Secure UAV Handover Admission}},
  author = {Mustafa Ghaleb and Zaafir Riaz and Radhwan A. Saleh and Zead Saleh and Ibrahim Althamary and Sajjad Ahmad Khan and Kerem Küçük and Hamdi Altaheri},
  journal = {Mathematics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/math14203817},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3817},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - TriTrust: Risk-Aware Three-Factor Trust Fusion for Secure UAV Handover Admission
AU  - Mustafa Ghaleb
AU  - Zaafir Riaz
AU  - Radhwan A. Saleh
AU  - Zead Saleh
AU  - Ibrahim Althamary
AU  - Sajjad Ahmad Khan
AU  - Kerem Küçük
AU  - Hamdi Altaheri
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Mathematics
DO  - 10.3390/math14203817
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/14/20/3817
AB  - Cooperative unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms require secure transaction-level admission decisions when tasks, relay roles, control privileges, or mission assets are transferred between aircraft. Existing authentication and intrusion-detection mechanisms address complementary aspects of security and motivate integrating a mandatory protocol check with post-authentication behavioral and corroborative assessment. This paper introduces TriTrust, a risk-aware three-factor trust-fusion architecture that enforces a mandatory protocol-admission gate, followed by logistic fusion of traffic-behavior and competence-weighted witness scores for gate-passing candidates. The framework further incorporates validation-fitted score mapping and robust federated maintenance of the witness classifier. Evaluation on a constructed proxy-handover benchmark derived from public UAV cyber-physical records using cyber-condition-derived labels, sampled gate outcomes, and simulated witness views demonstrates that the modeled gate provides the dominant control over false acceptance: removing it increases mean seed-level raw-score false-acceptance rate (FAR) from 0.43% to 9.62%. Across five prespecified resamplings of the same source corpus, the isotonic-mapped full pipeline attains a mean seed-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.9926, a mean FAR of 0.83%, and a mean false-rejection rate (FRR) of 1.75%. Under 20% scaled sign-reversal poisoning, coordinatewise median aggregation maintains mean witness-classifier accuracy of 0.8552, compared with 0.2920 for sample-size-weighted averaging. Feature-space stress tests further show that false acceptance under learned-input manipulation remains limited by the modeled gate, whereas gate bypass combined with learned-factor compromise produces high false-acceptance rates. These results characterize the contributions and failure boundary of protocol gating, post-gate trust fusion, score mapping, and robust federated maintenance within the constructed benchmark.
SN  - 2227-7390
ER  -