Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy

TRANSCRIPTIONAL MEMORY AND DRUG RESISTANCE IN PEDIATRIC ACUTE LYMPHOID LEUKEMIA

  1. 1Centro Infantil Boldrini, Campinas, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer. Although cure rates have improved considerably, 20–30% of patients relapse due to chemotherapy resistance. Recent single-cell sequencing studies [1] demonstrated that resistant clones do not emerge through the selection of genetically distinct subclones but rather through transitions between transcriptional states that can become stabilized by epigenetic mechanisms after repeated stress exposure, generating a “transcriptional memory”. Based on this hypothesis, we aim to analyze the transcriptome of B-cell ALL (B-ALL) samples after serial passage and chemotherapy treatment in mice, simulating disease relapse. We will investigate transcriptional changes associated with chemotherapy exposure and correlate them with in vitro drug resistance and patients’ clinical responses, assessed by minimal residual disease on days 8, 15, 33 and 78/96. Methods: Relapse models will be generated using diagnostic samples from 10 pediatric B-ALL cases, including five good and five poor clinical responders. Leukemia-bearing mice will receive vincristine (V), dexamethasone (D), l-asparaginase (L) and daunorubicin (Da). Relapsed samples collected after treatment cycles will be evaluated for resistance to these four drugs. Samples showing increased resistance will also be tested against a panel of 61 antineoplastic agents. Transcriptomic profiles of relapsed leukemias will be compared with matched untreated controls and subsequently between good and poor responder groups. Results: In this initial phase, the induction protocol was standardized using vincristine (0.15 mg/kg, once weekly), dexamethasone (5 mg/kg, five times weekly), asparaginase (1,000 IU/kg, twice weekly) and daunorubicin (1.2 mg/kg, once weekly), with adequate toxicity control. Leukemia progression was monitored weekly by flow cytometric analysis of 50 μL of peripheral blood, quantifying human CD45+ or CD19+ cells relative to murine CD45+ cells. Three of the ten selected B-ALL samples (one good responder and two poor responders) have already completed the protocol until the generation of the proposed transcriptional memory, while the remaining seven are still undergoing induction treatment. Conclusion: The established murine model reproduced differences in treatment response observed in patients. Poor responders exhibited reduced sensitivity to induction therapy, whereas leukemias from good responders also relapsed after a treatment-free period. The next phase will determine whether transcriptional memory is established during relapse, whether it is more frequent in poor responders, and which transcriptomic alterations are associated with chemotherapy resistance.

Related

  1. Resistance mechanisms and translational bottlenecks in CAR-T cell therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a perspective
    JiLi Xu, Lili Sui, Wenzhe Yang +2
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Multilineage lymphoid clonal hematopoiesis: a cross-sectional, correlative analysis of plasma cell dyscrasias and large granular lymphocytic leukemia
    Carlos Bravo-Perez, Carmelo Gurnari, Arda Durmaz +20
    LeukemiaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Hypofractionated Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation for Relapsed/Refractory Leukemia Using Helical Tomotherapy: Workflow and Dosimetric Analysis
    Wenjie Ni, Xiunan Wang, Hui Yang +5
    Yonsei Medical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyPMC
  4. Transcriptional rewiring of NF-κB by HBZ and Fra-2 drives inflammatory chemoresistance in Tax-negative adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
    J. Tram, L. Marty, c. Mourouvin +6
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  5. 179 Machine learning-based prediction of CAR-T cell therapy response in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients using single-cell multi-omics features
    Christopher Fisher
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{rosati2026transcriptional,
  title = {{TRANSCRIPTIONAL MEMORY AND DRUG RESISTANCE IN PEDIATRIC ACUTE LYMPHOID LEUKEMIA}},
  author = {Manuella Munuera ROSATI and Maria Luiza Silva PIRES and Juliana Ronchi CORRÊA and Amilcar Cardoso AZEVEDO and José Andrés YUNES},
  journal = {Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.htct.2026.107697},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.107697},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - TRANSCRIPTIONAL MEMORY AND DRUG RESISTANCE IN PEDIATRIC ACUTE LYMPHOID LEUKEMIA
AU  - Manuella Munuera ROSATI
AU  - Maria Luiza Silva PIRES
AU  - Juliana Ronchi CORRÊA
AU  - Amilcar Cardoso AZEVEDO
AU  - José Andrés YUNES
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
DO  - 10.1016/j.htct.2026.107697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.107697
AB  - Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer. Although cure rates have improved considerably, 20–30% of patients relapse due to chemotherapy resistance. Recent single-cell sequencing studies [1] demonstrated that resistant clones do not emerge through the selection of genetically distinct subclones but rather through transitions between transcriptional states that can become stabilized by epigenetic mechanisms after repeated stress exposure, generating a “transcriptional memory”. Based on this hypothesis, we aim to analyze the transcriptome of B-cell ALL (B-ALL) samples after serial passage and chemotherapy treatment in mice, simulating disease relapse. We will investigate transcriptional changes associated with chemotherapy exposure and correlate them with in vitro drug resistance and patients’ clinical responses, assessed by minimal residual disease on days 8, 15, 33 and 78/96. Methods: Relapse models will be generated using diagnostic samples from 10 pediatric B-ALL cases, including five good and five poor clinical responders. Leukemia-bearing mice will receive vincristine (V), dexamethasone (D), l-asparaginase (L) and daunorubicin (Da). Relapsed samples collected after treatment cycles will be evaluated for resistance to these four drugs. Samples showing increased resistance will also be tested against a panel of 61 antineoplastic agents. Transcriptomic profiles of relapsed leukemias will be compared with matched untreated controls and subsequently between good and poor responder groups. Results: In this initial phase, the induction protocol was standardized using vincristine (0.15 mg/kg, once weekly), dexamethasone (5 mg/kg, five times weekly), asparaginase (1,000 IU/kg, twice weekly) and daunorubicin (1.2 mg/kg, once weekly), with adequate toxicity control. Leukemia progression was monitored weekly by flow cytometric analysis of 50 μL of peripheral blood, quantifying human CD45+ or CD19+ cells relative to murine CD45+ cells. Three of the ten selected B-ALL samples (one good responder and two poor responders) have already completed the protocol until the generation of the proposed transcriptional memory, while the remaining seven are still undergoing induction treatment. Conclusion: The established murine model reproduced differences in treatment response observed in patients. Poor responders exhibited reduced sensitivity to induction therapy, whereas leukemias from good responders also relapsed after a treatment-free period. The next phase will determine whether transcriptional memory is established during relapse, whether it is more frequent in poor responders, and which transcriptomic alterations are associated with chemotherapy resistance.
SN  - 2531-1379
SN  - 2531-1387
ER  -