The influence of community engagement on stakeholder perspectives in cross-sector integrated care: an integrative review.
4 affiliations
- 1Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada. [email protected].
- 2Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. [email protected].
- 3Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
- 4Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Abstract
Background
Community engagement represents a highly relevant way to integrate care across sectors and address social and structural determinants of health with populations. Yet, advancement of integrated care remains a challenge, particularly across health and social service organizations. Situating social cognition as a key element of integrated care, this paper explores the act community engagement within cross-sector integrated care.Methods
An integrative review was conducted to determine what is known about the influence of community engagement on stakeholder perspectives in cross-sector integrated care, and to contribute to a more comprehensive evidence base for building and operationalizing equitable integrated care. In March 2022, four data bases were systematically searched, applying date limits 1990-2022, for English language articles that described community engagement in relation to integrated care and resulting stakeholder perspectives. Using matrices, numerous variables were extracted and synthesized using thematic analysis derived from the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care and a continuum of community engagement.Results
In total, 13 studies were included in this analysis. Two studies included the hospital as a partner, and the rest were a mix of public, private health, and social service sectors. Positive stakeholder perspectives (N = 6) were found in studies that were consultative or collaborative, and led with social capital, shared reciprocity, and trust. Moderate and negative perspectives (N = 7) were found in studies that led with a utilitarian stance and lacked collective leadership, governance, longitudinal planning, and joint evaluations.Conclusions
This review makes a singular contribution to cross-sector integrated care literature, utilizing perspectives from health and social service organizations to map what is known about the influence of community engagement on cross-sector integrative care. Perspectives from this review support calls for additional integrative care research exploring community-hospital relationships, and how power dynamics influence proximal and distal relationships, capabilities, motivations, and opportunities for collaboration.
Related
- From young aces to injury cases: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives on injury risk in junior to elite badminton
- Stakeholder perspectives on sustainable antenatal point-of-care ultrasound (APOCUS) implementation in rural Australia: a qualitative study of professional body submissions and clinician focus groups.
- Adaptive Governance and Community Agency in Crisis: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Engagement in Seke District, Zimbabwe
- Climate health action in Latin America and the Caribbean: Priorities identified through a multi-stakeholder engagement process
- ‘Navigating the ride’: stakeholder perspectives on public transportation challenges for children with autism in India
BibTeX
@article{wright2026influence,
title = {{The influence of community engagement on stakeholder perspectives in cross-sector integrated care: an integrative review.}},
author = {Vanessa Wright and Kelly Metcalfe and Whitney Berta},
journal = {BMC health services research},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12913-026-15156-z},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908031},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The influence of community engagement on stakeholder perspectives in cross-sector integrated care: an integrative review.
AU - Vanessa Wright
AU - Kelly Metcalfe
AU - Whitney Berta
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC health services research
DO - 10.1186/s12913-026-15156-z
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908031
AB - Background Community engagement represents a highly relevant way to integrate care across sectors and address social and structural determinants of health with populations. Yet, advancement of integrated care remains a challenge, particularly across health and social service organizations. Situating social cognition as a key element of integrated care, this paper explores the act community engagement within cross-sector integrated care.Methods An integrative review was conducted to determine what is known about the influence of community engagement on stakeholder perspectives in cross-sector integrated care, and to contribute to a more comprehensive evidence base for building and operationalizing equitable integrated care. In March 2022, four data bases were systematically searched, applying date limits 1990-2022, for English language articles that described community engagement in relation to integrated care and resulting stakeholder perspectives. Using matrices, numerous variables were extracted and synthesized using thematic analysis derived from the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care and a continuum of community engagement.Results In total, 13 studies were included in this analysis. Two studies included the hospital as a partner, and the rest were a mix of public, private health, and social service sectors. Positive stakeholder perspectives (N = 6) were found in studies that were consultative or collaborative, and led with social capital, shared reciprocity, and trust. Moderate and negative perspectives (N = 7) were found in studies that led with a utilitarian stance and lacked collective leadership, governance, longitudinal planning, and joint evaluations.Conclusions This review makes a singular contribution to cross-sector integrated care literature, utilizing perspectives from health and social service organizations to map what is known about the influence of community engagement on cross-sector integrative care. Perspectives from this review support calls for additional integrative care research exploring community-hospital relationships, and how power dynamics influence proximal and distal relationships, capabilities, motivations, and opportunities for collaboration.
SN - 1472-6963
ER -