Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,761 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYVideoGIE

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: technical tips for optimal outcomes

6 affiliations
  1. 1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  2. 2Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  3. 3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  4. 4Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center–Brighton, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  5. 5Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  6. 6Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Corresponding author: Hiroyuki Aihara, MD, PhD, Director of Tissue Resection Program, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) represents a minimally invasive therapeutic technique for selected gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs). However, procedural success is highly dependent on lesion characteristics and technical execution. We present a structured approach to gastric GISTs and a key technical consideration for successful STER by contrasting an unsuccessful case and a successful case. Methods: Two patients with gastric GISTs arising from the muscularis propria underwent attempted STER. Preprocedural EUS was performed to assess lesion size, depth, and growth pattern. Procedural steps, including tunnel strategy, scope orientation, and adjunctive maneuvers, were analyzed to identify factors influencing technical success. Results: In the first case, STER was performed with a long tunnel; however, because of the exophytic nature of the GIST, it failed to be visualized, leading to procedural abortion. In contrast, the second case demonstrated successful STER using a short tunnel approach, a horizontal mucosal incision to facilitate specimen extraction, careful scope reorientation to establish a tangential dissection plane, and snare-assisted confirmation of complete tumor mobilization. A mucosal tear occurred secondary to forward pressure during dissection and was managed with endoscopic suturing without adverse events. Conclusions: Successful STER for gastric GISTs can result from meticulous preprocedural EUS assessment, horizontal incision with short tunnel creation, and selective use of adjunctive techniques. Awareness of these technical principles may improve procedural success and safety.

Related

  1. Risk-based pathology reporting after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: international consensus standards
    Kareem Khalaf, Huaqi Li, Mai Iwaya +47
    GutPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  2. A preoperative scoring model to predict intraoperative high end-tidal carbon dioxide in endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors
    Fengcheng Zang, Qian Zhang, Yunfu Feng +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Biportal endoscopic foramen magnum decompression and C1 posterior arch resection for Chiari malformation type I: Technical note.
    Héctor Alonso Tirado-Ornelas, Silvia Loretto Tirado-Ornelas, Alejandro Esparza-Guinea +3
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Extended endoscopic endonasal resection of a transinfundibular craniopharyngioma with third ventricular extension associated with superficial siderosis: Operative technique and technical nuances.
    Tania Montserrat Jiménez Molina, Jorge Alejandro Rochin Mozqueda, Lilian Zavala Romero +5
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCPMC
  5. Endoscopic flexure straightening: a novel technique for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection at difficult flexures.
    Yuichi Hirano, Shunsuke Yoshii, Tomoki Michida +1
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{abdulrahmanqatomah2026submucosal,
  title = {{Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: technical tips for optimal outcomes}},
  author = {Abdulrahman Qatomah, MD and Daryl Ramai, MD, MSc, MPH and Talal Alenezi, MD and Dimo Dimitrov, MD and Mohammad Almesned, MD, MSc and Hiroyuki Aihara, MD, PhD},
  journal = {VideoGIE},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.vgie.2026.06.012},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2026.06.012},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: technical tips for optimal outcomes
AU  - Abdulrahman Qatomah, MD
AU  - Daryl Ramai, MD, MSc, MPH
AU  - Talal Alenezi, MD
AU  - Dimo Dimitrov, MD
AU  - Mohammad Almesned, MD, MSc
AU  - Hiroyuki Aihara, MD, PhD
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/08
JO  - VideoGIE
DO  - 10.1016/j.vgie.2026.06.012
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2026.06.012
AB  - Background and Aims: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) represents a minimally invasive therapeutic technique for selected gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs). However, procedural success is highly dependent on lesion characteristics and technical execution. We present a structured approach to gastric GISTs and a key technical consideration for successful STER by contrasting an unsuccessful case and a successful case. Methods: Two patients with gastric GISTs arising from the muscularis propria underwent attempted STER. Preprocedural EUS was performed to assess lesion size, depth, and growth pattern. Procedural steps, including tunnel strategy, scope orientation, and adjunctive maneuvers, were analyzed to identify factors influencing technical success. Results: In the first case, STER was performed with a long tunnel; however, because of the exophytic nature of the GIST, it failed to be visualized, leading to procedural abortion. In contrast, the second case demonstrated successful STER using a short tunnel approach, a horizontal mucosal incision to facilitate specimen extraction, careful scope reorientation to establish a tangential dissection plane, and snare-assisted confirmation of complete tumor mobilization. A mucosal tear occurred secondary to forward pressure during dissection and was managed with endoscopic suturing without adverse events. Conclusions: Successful STER for gastric GISTs can result from meticulous preprocedural EUS assessment, horizontal incision with short tunnel creation, and selective use of adjunctive techniques. Awareness of these technical principles may improve procedural success and safety.
SN  - 2468-4481
ER  -