Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The parity gap in crystal tensor prediction

Abstract

Crystal symmetry dictates whether a physical response tensor must vanish, establishing a direct test for machine learning predictions independent of property calculations. We derive the parity gap, a group-theoretic metric quantifying the piezoelectric tensor freedom permitted by a crystal's proper rotation subgroup SO(3) but eliminated by inversion symmetry in O(3). Across state-of-the-art equivariant neural network architectures, unconstrained SO(3) models systematically predict forbidden non-zero responses matching the parity gap of each centrosymmetric crystal class, while polar distortion paths dynamically map output responses to the loss of inversion symmetry. Regression controls confirm that enforcing full O(3) parity incurs no consistent accuracy cost across predictive tasks. Crucially, while training interventions using explicit zero labels reduce violation magnitudes, they leave residual forbidden outputs. Exact physical compliance instead requires structural enforcement through O(3) representation design or explicit output antisymmetrization. The parity gap thus provides a unified framework to distinguish empirical error reduction from exact structural compliance with physical law.

Related

  1. Inverse design of scalar-tensor EFT from odd-parity effective potentials
    Kazufumi Takahashi, Yuki Watanabe
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Many-body topology in parity-preserving tensor networks
    Maksimilian Usoltcev, Nguyen Hanh Dung, Carolin Wille +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Parity-violating scalar-tensor theory revisited: complete basis up to d=4 and Hamiltonian analysis
    Yun-Chuan Zhang, Yu-Min Hu, Xian Gao
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGravitation & general relativityHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Magnetic crystal generation with site-resolved magnetic moments via Gaussian-mixture retargeting and finite-budget yield prediction
    Wen-Chuang Shang, Chenyu Shen, Mikito Tsujimoto +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textComputational physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Crystal Structure Based Graph Neural Network And LLM Multi-Modal Approach for Material Magnetic Ordering Prediction
    Adam Zheng, April Zheng, Sheng Ran
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{polat2026parity,
  title = {{The parity gap in crystal tensor prediction}},
  author = {Can Polat and Mustafa Kurban and Erchin Serpedin and Hasan Kurban},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.18714},
  eprint = {2608.18714},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18714},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The parity gap in crystal tensor prediction
AU  - Can Polat
AU  - Mustafa Kurban
AU  - Erchin Serpedin
AU  - Hasan Kurban
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.18714
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18714
AB  - Crystal symmetry dictates whether a physical response tensor must vanish, establishing a direct test for machine learning predictions independent of property calculations. We derive the parity gap, a group-theoretic metric quantifying the piezoelectric tensor freedom permitted by a crystal's proper rotation subgroup SO(3) but eliminated by inversion symmetry in O(3). Across state-of-the-art equivariant neural network architectures, unconstrained SO(3) models systematically predict forbidden non-zero responses matching the parity gap of each centrosymmetric crystal class, while polar distortion paths dynamically map output responses to the loss of inversion symmetry. Regression controls confirm that enforcing full O(3) parity incurs no consistent accuracy cost across predictive tasks. Crucially, while training interventions using explicit zero labels reduce violation magnitudes, they leave residual forbidden outputs. Exact physical compliance instead requires structural enforcement through O(3) representation design or explicit output antisymmetrization. The parity gap thus provides a unified framework to distinguish empirical error reduction from exact structural compliance with physical law.
ER  -