Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,549 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Postprandial amino acid profiles and gastric behavior after consumption of milk and plant-based alternatives: a randomized cross-over study in healthy males

  1. 1Wageningen University

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing availability of plant-based alternatives for bovine milk. However, plant-based drinks differ e.g. in protein quantity, protein quality and carbohydrate composition. Knowledge on the impact this has on digestion-related outcomes such as postprandial amino acid (AA) availability and gastric behavior is still limited. Additionally, data on milk alternatives with higher overall protein concentration are lacking.

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the differences in postprandial AA profiles, glycemic response, and gastric behavior between bovine milk and plant-based drinks with or without added protein using representative commercial drinks.

Methods12 healthy males participated in a randomized crossover study with three treatments. After an overnight fast, participants drank 750 ml of semi-skimmed milk (Milk), a standard oat-based drink (OBD) or an oat-based drink enriched with pea protein (OBD+Pea). Blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma AA, glucose, insulin and FGF21 over 5 hours. Gastric content changes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging scans for Milk and OBD+Pea over 2 hours.

ResultsCompared with Milk, both oat-based drinks elicited lower 5-h total AA iAUC (OBD-169706; OBD+pea -139552 {micro}M{middle dot}min; both P<0.001) and EAA iAUC (OBD -91748; OBD+pea-78199; both P<0.001), with no differences between oat-based drinks. Gastric content volume was lower for OBD+Pea versus Milk from 60-120 min (range -48 - -84 ml, all P<0.001). Compared to Milk, OBD and OBD+Pea increased glucose more from 15-45 min (range 0.86-1.73 mmol/l, all P<0.001) and insulin from 30-60 min (1.84-2.14-fold, all P<0.001).

ConclusionsProtein enrichment in plant-based milk alternatives can be a valuable strategy to increase protein content and improve amino acid composition. However, such products still show faster gastric emptying, lower postprandial essential amino acid and higher glycemic and insulinemic responses compared to bovine milk because of their different carbohydrate and protein content and quality.

Related

  1. Effect of Timing of Apple Juice Consumption on Postprandial Glycemia: A Randomized Crossover Trial
    Jinru Ren, Yunchu Feng, Ruixin Zhu +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  2. Plant-based meat and dairy alternatives in Norway: consumption, nutritional quality and Nutri-Score based on data from the Norkost 4 survey.
    Anna Amberntsson, Dina Moxness Konglevoll, Annika Eliassen +4
    European journal of nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Commercial Goat Cheeses Show No Differences in Postprandial Satiety During Caloric Restriction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Diana A. Vela-Vásquez, Ivan Delgado-Enciso, Aram Y. Rubio-Reyes +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Effects of Breakfasts with Different Carbohydrate Contents and Glycemic Index Values on Postprandial Subjective Satiety and Plasma Gut Hormone Concentrations in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Secondary Analysis of an Acute Randomized Crossover Controlled-Feeding Study
    Qian Ma, Wenjing Liu, Mengmeng Zheng +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  5. Effects of Kinect-based mixed-reality exercise and deep-sea water consumption on metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Hyejung Shin, Nur Afiqah Binti Zulkifli, Byunggul Lim +1
    Physical activity and nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{leenders2026postprandial,
  title = {{Postprandial amino acid profiles and gastric behavior after consumption of milk and plant-based alternatives: a randomized cross-over study in healthy males}},
  author = {L. M. Leenders and S. Casagranda and M. G. J. Balvers and G. de Gier and T. T. Lambers and P. A. M. Smeets},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.23.26363226},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.23.26363226v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Postprandial amino acid profiles and gastric behavior after consumption of milk and plant-based alternatives: a randomized cross-over study in healthy males
AU  - L. M. Leenders
AU  - S. Casagranda
AU  - M. G. J. Balvers
AU  - G. de Gier
AU  - T. T. Lambers
AU  - P. A. M. Smeets
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.23.26363226
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.23.26363226v1
AB  - BackgroundThere is a growing availability of plant-based alternatives for bovine milk. However, plant-based drinks differ e.g. in protein quantity, protein quality and carbohydrate composition. Knowledge on the impact this has on digestion-related outcomes such as postprandial amino acid (AA) availability and gastric behavior is still limited. Additionally, data on milk alternatives with higher overall protein concentration are lacking.  ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the differences in postprandial AA profiles, glycemic response, and gastric behavior between bovine milk and plant-based drinks with or without added protein using representative commercial drinks.  Methods12 healthy males participated in a randomized crossover study with three treatments. After an overnight fast, participants drank 750 ml of semi-skimmed milk (Milk), a standard oat-based drink (OBD) or an oat-based drink enriched with pea protein (OBD+Pea). Blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma AA, glucose, insulin and FGF21 over 5 hours. Gastric content changes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging scans for Milk and OBD+Pea over 2 hours.  ResultsCompared with Milk, both oat-based drinks elicited lower 5-h total AA iAUC (OBD-169706; OBD+pea -139552 {micro}M{middle dot}min; both P<0.001) and EAA iAUC (OBD -91748; OBD+pea-78199; both P<0.001), with no differences between oat-based drinks. Gastric content volume was lower for OBD+Pea versus Milk from 60-120 min (range -48 - -84 ml, all P<0.001). Compared to Milk, OBD and OBD+Pea increased glucose more from 15-45 min (range 0.86-1.73 mmol/l, all P<0.001) and insulin from 30-60 min (1.84-2.14-fold, all P<0.001).  ConclusionsProtein enrichment in plant-based milk alternatives can be a valuable strategy to increase protein content and improve amino acid composition. However, such products still show faster gastric emptying, lower postprandial essential amino acid and higher glycemic and insulinemic responses compared to bovine milk because of their different carbohydrate and protein content and quality.
ER  -