Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

Evaluation of Awareness of the Need for Orthodontic Treatment Across Different Age Groups in Adolescents and Young Adults.

  1. 1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Harran University, 63000 Sanliurfa, Turkey.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the awareness levels of individuals presenting to an orthodontic clinic regarding their orthodontic treatment needs and to identify the various factors contributing to the development of this awareness, particularly the developmental period. Methods: A total of 160 participants were divided into four equal age groups (n = 40 each): early adolescence, middle adolescence, late adolescence, and young adults. Participants' subjective awareness of orthodontic treatment need was assessed using questionnaire items, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for self-perceived dental aesthetics, while normative treatment need was evaluated by an expert orthodontist using the IOTN, DAI, and ICON. The primary outcome was aesthetic agreement, classified as underestimation, exact concordance, or overestimation according to the participant-minus-researcher raw IOTN-AC score difference. Sensitivity analyses allowed a ±1-point tolerance and included a pooled analysis of the two youngest age groups. Results: Researcher IOTN-AC scores correlated strongly with IOTN-DHC (ρ = 0.861; 95% CI 0.804-0.904), DAI (ρ = 0.755; 95% CI 0.664-0.827), and ICON (ρ = 0.860; 95% CI 0.802-0.903; all Holm-adjusted p < 0.001, n = 160), confirming construct alignment with normative treatment need. Subjective perception of dental irregularity and skeletal discrepancy increased significantly with age (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001). In the exploratory pooled model, the odds of underestimation rather than exact concordance were lower at 19-21 years (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.04-0.35) and 22-30 years (OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.03-0.28) than at 12-18 years. The concordant perception group demonstrated higher self-referral and subjective awareness (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, these estimates remain susceptible to sparse-data bias. Conclusions: Personal awareness of morphological and skeletal discrepancies strengthens with age, with treatment-need underestimation diminishing significantly from age 19 onward in favor of concordant perception. However, conclusions specific to middle adolescence remain uncertain because exact concordance was sparse. While enhancing awareness at younger ages is hypothesized to facilitate timely intervention during active growth periods, longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term clinical consequences of early awareness deficits on skeletal growth patterns and subsequent surgical requirements.

Related

  1. A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes on Salivary pH in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Sruthi Jeevagan, Sathi Rami Reddy Mora, Mohamed Rahmankhan N +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A comparison and evaluation of the use of three orthodontic indices in assessing the treatment outcome.
    Rayed Aldausari, Maryam Al-Zayer, Marie Pegelow
    Acta odontologica ScandinavicaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  3. Comparison of Sleep Quality Across Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns in Orthodontic Patients
    Chanistha Sirichan, Narissaporn Chaiprakit, Siripatra Patchanee
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  4. Evaluation of Buccal Shelf Bone Dimensions and Bone Density in Adolescents and Adults With Different Mandibular Growth Patterns.
    Nungshinaro Tzudir, Soi Chakraborty, Adeel A Bajjad +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and preliminary evaluation of a group adaptation of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in adolescents (UP-A) in a Spanish public mental health center.
    Lucía Cortés, Julia García-Escalera, Irene Casanova +3
    BMC psychologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{polat2026evaluation,
  title = {{Evaluation of Awareness of the Need for Orthodontic Treatment Across Different Age Groups in Adolescents and Young Adults.}},
  author = {Mevlüde Yüce Polat and Mahmut Tankuş and Başak Akdağ},
  journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/healthcare14203501},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940546},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluation of Awareness of the Need for Orthodontic Treatment Across Different Age Groups in Adolescents and Young Adults.
AU  - Mevlüde Yüce Polat
AU  - Mahmut Tankuş
AU  - Başak Akdağ
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/18
JO  - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/healthcare14203501
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940546
AB  - Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the awareness levels of individuals presenting to an orthodontic clinic regarding their orthodontic treatment needs and to identify the various factors contributing to the development of this awareness, particularly the developmental period. Methods: A total of 160 participants were divided into four equal age groups (n = 40 each): early adolescence, middle adolescence, late adolescence, and young adults. Participants' subjective awareness of orthodontic treatment need was assessed using questionnaire items, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need-Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for self-perceived dental aesthetics, while normative treatment need was evaluated by an expert orthodontist using the IOTN, DAI, and ICON. The primary outcome was aesthetic agreement, classified as underestimation, exact concordance, or overestimation according to the participant-minus-researcher raw IOTN-AC score difference. Sensitivity analyses allowed a ±1-point tolerance and included a pooled analysis of the two youngest age groups. Results: Researcher IOTN-AC scores correlated strongly with IOTN-DHC (ρ = 0.861; 95% CI 0.804-0.904), DAI (ρ = 0.755; 95% CI 0.664-0.827), and ICON (ρ = 0.860; 95% CI 0.802-0.903; all Holm-adjusted p < 0.001, n = 160), confirming construct alignment with normative treatment need. Subjective perception of dental irregularity and skeletal discrepancy increased significantly with age (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001). In the exploratory pooled model, the odds of underestimation rather than exact concordance were lower at 19-21 years (OR = 0.11; 95% CI 0.04-0.35) and 22-30 years (OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.03-0.28) than at 12-18 years. The concordant perception group demonstrated higher self-referral and subjective awareness (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, these estimates remain susceptible to sparse-data bias. Conclusions: Personal awareness of morphological and skeletal discrepancies strengthens with age, with treatment-need underestimation diminishing significantly from age 19 onward in favor of concordant perception. However, conclusions specific to middle adolescence remain uncertain because exact concordance was sparse. While enhancing awareness at younger ages is hypothesized to facilitate timely intervention during active growth periods, longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term clinical consequences of early awareness deficits on skeletal growth patterns and subsequent surgical requirements.
SN  - 2227-9032
ER  -