Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEcological Indicators

When does rural population decline improve ecological quality? Evidence from population-density thresholds and spatial heterogeneity across Chinese counties

  1. 1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China; Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  2. 2Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China; Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract

While a reduction in rural population density is commonly believed to alleviate human-land pressure and enhance ecological quality, this relationship may be far more complex when nonlinear dynamics are taken into account. Focusing on rural China, this study examines, whether the ecological effects of declining population density vary across different population density levels by employing county-level data from 2000 to 2020. The results show that ecological quality has generally improved across rural China, while pressures persist in developed and densely populated areas. More importantly, a clear double-threshold in rural population density is identified: one is an “Effect Intensification Threshold”, below which the ecological benefits of rural depopulation accelerate markedly, and an “Effect Reversal Threshold”, beyond which continued population loss reverses these benefits and leads to ecological degradation. Furthermore, regional disparities are pronounced, with ecological carrying capacities corresponding to differentiated threshold points: the Eastern region exhibits higher threshold levels, whereas the central and western regions generally follow the national pattern. Overall, this study advances a dynamic framework for understanding human-land interactions in depopulating rural systems and provides critical evidence for designing spatially tailored ecological policies.

Related

  1. Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Landscape Patterns and Ecological Risk Under Changing Human Activity in the Qilian Mountains
    Shengji Jiang, Heng Ren, Hua Xu +1
    Ecology and evolutionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Hierarchical clustering for disentangling population vulnerability to asthma
    Environmental advancesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionEurope PMC
  3. Multistability in a two-patch population model with weak Allee effect
    Tewfik Sari, Roger Arditi
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionGeneral mathematicsHAL
  4. Evaporation of cloud particles: solutions to the population balance equation and formulation of memory based bulk schemes (MBBS, v1.0)
    Antonio Torregrosa Abellán, Hannah Bergner, Peter Spichtinger
    EGUspherePreprintCC BY 4.0General earth scienceEGUsphere
  5. Arabian hydroclimate and hominin population dynamics over the last 500,000 years
    Liang Zhou, Zhaoxia Jiang, Sanzhong Li +10
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{liu2026when,
  title = {{When does rural population decline improve ecological quality? Evidence from population-density thresholds and spatial heterogeneity across Chinese counties}},
  author = {Zhen Liu and Shujie Hou and Wei Qi},
  journal = {Ecological Indicators},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115710},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115710},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - When does rural population decline improve ecological quality? Evidence from population-density thresholds and spatial heterogeneity across Chinese counties
AU  - Zhen Liu
AU  - Shujie Hou
AU  - Wei Qi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Ecological Indicators
DO  - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115710
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115710
AB  - While a reduction in rural population density is commonly believed to alleviate human-land pressure and enhance ecological quality, this relationship may be far more complex when nonlinear dynamics are taken into account. Focusing on rural China, this study examines, whether the ecological effects of declining population density vary across different population density levels by employing county-level data from 2000 to 2020. The results show that ecological quality has generally improved across rural China, while pressures persist in developed and densely populated areas. More importantly, a clear double-threshold in rural population density is identified: one is an “Effect Intensification Threshold”, below which the ecological benefits of rural depopulation accelerate markedly, and an “Effect Reversal Threshold”, beyond which continued population loss reverses these benefits and leads to ecological degradation. Furthermore, regional disparities are pronounced, with ecological carrying capacities corresponding to differentiated threshold points: the Eastern region exhibits higher threshold levels, whereas the central and western regions generally follow the national pattern. Overall, this study advances a dynamic framework for understanding human-land interactions in depopulating rural systems and provides critical evidence for designing spatially tailored ecological policies.
SN  - 1470-160X
SN  - 1872-7034
ER  -