PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
Classical and Quantum Logics with Multiple Non-Equivalent and Non-Isomorphic Models
Abstract
Both quantum and classical logics have several mutually non-equivalent and non-isomorphic models as has repeatedly been proved in the literature. Yet, several authors have recently come with criticisms of this result. In this paper, we show that the criticisms are either unfounded or wrong.
Related
- Intuitionistic and Constructive Modal Logics for Classical Modal Logicians
- Information-Spectrum General Formulas for the Capacity Region of Classical-Quantum Multiple Access Channels
- Unlocking Exponential and Unbounded Robust Gains in Shannon Capacity of Classical Multiple Access Channels with Causal CSIT via Quantum Entanglement Assistance
- Simultaneous extensions of states on quantum logics
- Isomorphic classification of the coordinate algebras of the two-parameter braided quantum groups SL2.
BibTeX
@misc{pavicic2026classical,
title = {{Classical and Quantum Logics with Multiple Non-Equivalent and Non-Isomorphic Models}},
author = {Mladen Pavicic},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.02070},
eprint = {2611.02070},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02070},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Classical and Quantum Logics with Multiple Non-Equivalent and Non-Isomorphic Models
AU - Mladen Pavicic
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.02070
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02070
AB - Both quantum and classical logics have several mutually non-equivalent and non-isomorphic models as has repeatedly been proved in the literature. Yet, several authors have recently come with criticisms of this result. In this paper, we show that the criticisms are either unfounded or wrong.
ER -