Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJTCVS open

The interaction of age and time on durable left ventricular assist device and its effect on heart transplant outcomes.

  1. 1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
  3. 3Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to assess the interaction between age and left ventricular assist device duration on heart transplant outcomes in the modern era.Methods

All heart transplantation in adults with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device between October 2018 and June 2025 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Groups were stratified primarily by age less than 55 years and 55 years or more and secondarily by age less than 2 years and 2 years or more of left ventricular assist device support. The primary outcome was post-heart transplant survival.Results

A total of 1005 patients were aged less than 55 years, with 608 having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years and 397 having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more. There was no significant difference in post-heart transplant survival between left ventricular assist device duration groups at 90 days (95.3% vs 94.4%, P = .57), 1 year (93.7% vs 90.2%, P = .07), or 3 years (88.0% vs 83.9%, P = .061). A total of 1411 patients were aged 55 years or more, with 935 having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years and 476 having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more. Patients having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years exhibited improved survival at 90 days (92.4% vs 89.2%, P = .046), 1 year (87.8% vs 81.9%, P = .0051), and 3 years (81.4% vs 72.7%, P = .0011). Multivariable adjustment showed a significant impact of age 55 years or more on post-heart transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.34-2.86; P < .001); however, having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more showed no significant impact (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.91-2.36; P = .116). Formal testing revealed no significant interaction of age and left ventricular assist device duration (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.63-1.91; P = .735).Conclusions

Although there is a lower observed post-heart transplant survival in patients aged 55 years or more and supported by a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more, formal testing reveals no significant interaction of these variables on mortality.

Related

  1. Nationwide Evolution of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes Following Introduction of the HeartMate 3 and Destination Therapy in Japan ― The Third Official Report From J-MACS ―
    Teruhiko Imamura, Koichiro Kinugawa, Takashi Nishimura +15
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  2. Long-Term Outcomes of Contemporary Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Younger Patients: A EUROMACS Analysis
    Guglielmo Gallone, Kevin M Veen, Alexander M Bernhardt +21
    European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  3. Clinically Actionable Prevention and Management of Major Complications During Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: A Contemporary Narrative Review
    Wei Yong Sheng, Tian Sheng Tang, You Shi Wu +3
    Cardiology researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Predicting the right! Validation of right heart failure predictive risk models after primary durable ventricular assist device implantation
    Marjolijn Carolien Sales, Rachad Zayat, Nima Hatam +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedSystems & synthetic biologyCardiovascular medicinePLOS
  5. Non-Cardiac Surgery After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Perioperative Management and Outcomes from a Single Center
    Journal of cardiovascular development and diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{sollie2026interaction,
  title = {{The interaction of age and time on durable left ventricular assist device and its effect on heart transplant outcomes.}},
  author = {Zachary W Sollie and Jennie H Kwon and Caroline C Miller and Jingwen Zhang and Brett A Welch and Chakradhari Inampudi and Arman Kilic},
  journal = {JTCVS open},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1016/j.xjon.2026.102068},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948138},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The interaction of age and time on durable left ventricular assist device and its effect on heart transplant outcomes.
AU  - Zachary W Sollie
AU  - Jennie H Kwon
AU  - Caroline C Miller
AU  - Jingwen Zhang
AU  - Brett A Welch
AU  - Chakradhari Inampudi
AU  - Arman Kilic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/22
JO  - JTCVS open
DO  - 10.1016/j.xjon.2026.102068
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42948138
AB  - Objective  This study aims to assess the interaction between age and left ventricular assist device duration on heart transplant outcomes in the modern era.Methods  All heart transplantation in adults with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device between October 2018 and June 2025 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Groups were stratified primarily by age less than 55 years and 55 years or more and secondarily by age less than 2 years and 2 years or more of left ventricular assist device support. The primary outcome was post-heart transplant survival.Results  A total of 1005 patients were aged less than 55 years, with 608 having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years and 397 having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more. There was no significant difference in post-heart transplant survival between left ventricular assist device duration groups at 90 days (95.3% vs 94.4%, P = .57), 1 year (93.7% vs 90.2%, P = .07), or 3 years (88.0% vs 83.9%, P = .061). A total of 1411 patients were aged 55 years or more, with 935 having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years and 476 having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more. Patients having a left ventricular assist device for less than 2 years exhibited improved survival at 90 days (92.4% vs 89.2%, P = .046), 1 year (87.8% vs 81.9%, P = .0051), and 3 years (81.4% vs 72.7%, P = .0011). Multivariable adjustment showed a significant impact of age 55 years or more on post-heart transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.34-2.86; P < .001); however, having a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more showed no significant impact (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.91-2.36; P = .116). Formal testing revealed no significant interaction of age and left ventricular assist device duration (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.63-1.91; P = .735).Conclusions  Although there is a lower observed post-heart transplant survival in patients aged 55 years or more and supported by a left ventricular assist device for 2 years or more, formal testing reveals no significant interaction of these variables on mortality.
SN  - 2666-2736
ER  -